From: RichA on 12 Jul 2010 17:37 The terrorist-under-ever-bed style kooks in Britain still hold sway. No wonder they won't let their citizens have guns, they'd be the first targets! Amateur Photographer A rail firm has been forced into an embarrassing climbdown - and to make an apology - after a passenger was told he faced arrest under anti-terror laws for taking pictures on a train. Nigel Roberts, 41, had taken photographs with his mobile phone on a Weymouth to London train to highlight what he saw as overcrowding and potential danger caused by heavy luggage in the aisles. Roberts claimed that, in an emergency, passengers would not have been able to get out of the train and he raised his concerns with a ticket inspector, showing him the pictures he had taken. However, the inspector said Roberts risked being arrested under anti- terrorism legislation and threatened to call police. The guard told Roberts that, under the Terrorism Act, he was not allowed to take pictures on any trains. 'But this is not the case,' a South West Trains spokeswoman told Amateur Photographer. 'This was clearly a misunderstanding. These pictures were not a threat to the public. As far as we are concerned, people can take pictures on our trains.' South West Trains admitted that the train had been crowded with people, who had been on a cruise, returning from Southampton. The spokeswoman said the train company has now issued a written apology to Roberts.
From: Paul Heslop on 12 Jul 2010 20:13 RichA wrote: > > The terrorist-under-ever-bed style kooks in Britain still hold sway. > No wonder they won't let their citizens have guns, they'd be the first > targets! > > Amateur Photographer > > A rail firm has been forced into an embarrassing climbdown - and to > make an apology - after a passenger was told he faced arrest under > anti-terror laws for taking pictures on a train. yer a bit late, I mentioned this on friday :O) -- Paul (we break easy) ------------------------------------------------------- Stop and Look http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/
From: Martin Brown on 13 Jul 2010 03:30 On 13/07/2010 01:13, Paul Heslop wrote: > RichA wrote: >> >> The terrorist-under-ever-bed style kooks in Britain still hold sway. Actually the UK police are pretty good about distinguishing between the sorts of architectural photographs likely to be of use to terrorists and random snaps. In the encounters I have had with them they have always been professional YMMV. OTOH jobsworth private security droids deployed with little or no training enjoy exercising their "power" over the public and are basically clueless thugs. These days the ubiquitous mobile phone has more than enough resolution to do reconnaissance photography without even being noticed. >> No wonder they won't let their citizens have guns, they'd be the first >> targets! It helps keep the murder rate an order of magnitude lower than in ill disciplined trigger happy gun toting places like the USA. I have only ever come under live fire once and that was in LA at a petrol station. >> >> Amateur Photographer >> >> A rail firm has been forced into an embarrassing climbdown - and to >> make an apology - after a passenger was told he faced arrest under >> anti-terror laws for taking pictures on a train. > > yer a bit late, I mentioned this on friday :O) There are moronic jobsworths everywhere. But the AP story may only be a part of the tale - if the guy was photographing parts of the train that would be a target for sabotage then the operator might have had a point. Remember that in the UK we have lived with the threat of US funded IRA terrorists blowing up our shopping centres and infrastructure for over four decades. Islamic terrorists are more willing to inflict gratuitous civilian casualties but large bombs in our cities are not new. BTW Yesterday was the peak of the rioting season in Northern Ireland. Regards, Martin Brown
From: Blue on 13 Jul 2010 03:41 RichA wrote: > The terrorist-under-ever-bed style kooks in Britain still hold sway. > No wonder they won't let their citizens have guns, they'd be the first > targets! see Harlow Street Scene Manager
From: sutartsorric on 13 Jul 2010 07:10 On 12 July, 22:37, RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > 'This was clearly a misunderstanding. These pictures were not a threat > to the public. As far as we are concerned, people can take pictures on > our trains.' > This was no misunderstanding. This is the "lets pretend we dont know the rules and impose our own" attitude that all the transport jobsworth use initially to prevent photography. It is only when (or if) the photographer actually challenges said jobsworth that the management has to come out of hiding and issue the misunderstanding statement, to head off any legal action. For the last 10 years there has been a creeping Stalinistic tendency from transport management to photographers at any location. They dont want any photos taken, except for their own "rose tinted" promotional ones.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Prev: tough to be a wedding photographer Next: Panasonic: Rasberry of the month award |