Integer factorization, etc.
in [Math]
|
From: Matthew T. Russotto on 18 Apr 2008 20:20 naked she finally tells me: she is Kurt Russel's little sister. > Of course I thought she was pulling my leg, but she pulls a photo book > out and sure enough, she is Kurt Russel's little sister! I got her phone > number, but boy she is a big LOSER. This email didn't contain his age, yet I knew it and many other things about him simply from collecting them over time. I had no special need to do so, but found it could add important detail to a security incident report. As previously shown, for an incident report on someone working on their own job within the firm I compared the capabilities of the code he sent out to his own job description which he transmitted in his resume many months prior. Why waste information that's just flying by for the taking? Care for a fun conspiracy theory? If I were pro-ECHELON, I would monitor all the Senators and ALL their staff AND all their families. That's just to start. I would also monitor ALL up-and-coming politicians. You never know when you're going to need to squeeze some support out of them. Has Bill Clinton been compromised by NSA ECHELON monitoring? * "The Secret War Against the Jews", Authors: John Loftus and Mark Aarons * * A large number of American candidates for public office have been placed * under electronic surveillance by British intelligence officers sitting *
From: fortune.bruce on 18 Apr 2008 21:17 > * Name : openGeneratedFile > * Name : StartUp > * Name : ReconTool.cc > * Name : ReconTool::ReconTool() > * Name : loadConfig > * Name : getData > * Name : getMultiData > * Name : LogError > * Name : readTableNames > * Name : constructSqlStatement > * Name : processQuery > * Name : storeColumnData - gets various column attributes > * Name : lookupInTableB > * Name : printReportRow > * Name : printEndOfReport > * Name : clearDownRows > * Name : openReportFile > * Name : StartUp > > > Redhot #2) > > : ********************************* > : Filename: May_22_96/dfAA16598 Size: 11786, Dated: May 22 16:07 > : Sender: someone(a)sbixxx (someone someone) > : Recipient: someone(a)bfm.com > : Subject: prepay.c > : ********************************* > > > static char *rcsid="$Id: prepay.c,v 1.29 1996/03/26 13:42:30 kautilya"; > /* Copyright M-) 1995 by Salomon Brothers Inc. All rights reserved. > ** Unpublished. > ** This software is proprietary and confidential to Salomon Brothers Inc > ** and may not be duplicated, disclosed to third parties, or used for > ** any purpose not expressly authorized by Salomon Brothers Inc. > ** Any unauthorized use, duplication, or disclosure is prohibited by law > ** and will result in prosecution. */ > > About 500 lines of C source outbound. Full source is enclosed. > > > > Last line in this email is marked as such, there are no attachments. > Thanks, > ---guy > > [snip] > > Roger, > > Let me know if this is what you want, other
From: Nick Wedd on 18 Apr 2008 19:28 -narcotics budget from $4.3 billion in 1988 to $11.9 billion * in 1992. * * The results were disappointing. * * After four years there was more cocaine on the streets than ever. * Naturally, it was also cheaper than ever. * * The overall crime rate was unchanged too. * * Inside Main Justice, such numbers are depressing. To those outside the law * enforcement community, it might have seemed an ironic, even heretical * notion, but to many of the career lawyers and prosecutors inside Main * Justice it was an article of faith that solving the nation's drug problem * could not be accomplished by prosecution and jail sentences alone. These * career people feel the answer is self-evident: Education, rehabilitation * and improving the grim lot of most of those prone to drug addiction ought * to become national priorities. * * Said David Margolis, who had supervised the Criminal Division's anti- * narcotics efforts in the early 1990s: "Anyone who thinks that drug * enforcement is primarily a law enforcement issue, they're smoking wacky * tabacky." Tell all the damn manipulative politicians. Jail's not even cost effective. * RAND Study Finds Mandatory Minimums Cost-Ineffective * ---------------------------------------------------- * * Excerpt from RAND Press Release: * * Washington, DC, May 12, 1997 -- If cutting drug consumption and * drug-related crime are the nation's prime drug control * objectives, then the mandatory minimum drug sentencing laws * in force at the federal level and in most states are not the * way to get there. * * This is the key finding of "Mandatory Minimum Drug * Sentences: Throwing Away the Key or the Taxpayer's Money?", *
From: Risto Lankinen on 18 Apr 2008 20:31 of Ross Perot, especially Perot's exaggerated [beat the drum * of fear] warnings that the nation's savings and loan institutions * were about to collapse. As a reult of mounting anxiety generated by * the Texas businessman, Alvarez decided to move the nest egg from his * savings and loan. * * He placed some of the money in a regular bank and hid the balance in * small caches around the house. * * When the sky did not fall, when Ross Perot's predictions did not come * true, Alvarez began slowly moving the cash in his house back into a * bank. Partly because of his fear of a possible robbery, he chose to * redeposit his money in relatively small amounts, $5000 or so at a time. * * While Alvarez had come to know Perot's gloomy predictions were off the * mark, he did not know that the federal international government, in its * hysteria about drugs, had persuaded Congress to greatly expand the * government's civil and criminal powers to seize assets of individuals * it felt might be up to some illicit business. The government's concern * was so overwhelming that in 1986 Congress was prevailed upon to add a * provision to the seizure law forbidding any "structuring" of financial * transactions in a way so as to evade and existing requirement that cash * transfers of more than $10,000 had to be reported to the government. [ The New York Times, April 13, 1997 U.
From: Tim Smith on 18 Apr 2008 19:19
Secret Service: Harassment of 2600 o Secret Service: Vile Persecution of Ed Cummings o Secret Service: Harassment of Steve Jackson Games * The New York Times, CyberTimes, June 20, 1997 * * Panel Chief Says Computer Attacks Are Sure to Come * * By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS * * WASHINGTON -- It is "only a matter of time" before critical U.S. computer * systems face major attack, the head of a White House panel on the nation's * infrastructure systems warned. * * Robert Marsh is the head of the President's Commission on Critical * Infrastructure Protection. Whatever should we do about those nasty hackers? ****************************************************************************** Secret Service: Harassment of 2600 ------ ------- ---------- -- ---- A group of above-ground hackers associated with 2600 were having a lawful peaceful public meeting at the Pentagon City Mall on November 6, 1992. The meeting was busted up by mall police for no apparent reason. Identification was demanded from everyone. Bags were searched. It's the 1990s now. The harassment was publicized by 2600, and a reporter talked to the head of the mall's security: he let slip that the Secret Service ordered them to harass 2600's lawful peaceful public meeting. That was definitely news. The mall security manager then denied what he said about Secret Service ordering the harassment: luckily the reporter recorded his conversation. CPSR [Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility] and Marc Rotenberg of EPIC [Electronic Privacy Information Center] began FOIA [U.S. Freedom of Information Act] proceedings to find out about this incident. The case raises significant issues of freedom of speech and assembly, privacy and government accountability. In response to an FOIA asking why this happened, the Secret Service responded: "We are sure no one knows why we had the m |