From: Howard Kaikow on
On 1/15/2010 07:49, Gordon Potter wrote:
> OnLine Quicken in a few weeks, Software 5 years max.
>
> I expect Quicken 2011 for Windows to be the last version - unless they
> choose to skip 2011 and make a 2012 version.
>
> I doubt there will be any new Mac versions.
>
> http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2010/tc2010018_451437.htm

Thanx for the posting. I guess that there's no point in buying Quicken.
I was about to run out today and purchase Quicken Home and Business
2010, as well as the Quicken Official Guide.

I have not been a Quicken user tho I did try the trial version of
Quicken Premier 2007.

I would never use the web based version of ANY software that required
access to my private info.
From: Andrew on
Second try to Robert Neville - trying to get facts to back up the claim
(which I personally do subscribe to, but a factoid that shows it's not just
MY or YOUR opinion would go well with my letter): " The arrogance comes from
believing that consumers want this kind of architecture and business model
when the evidence to date is pretty clear they don't."

--
-------------------------------------------------------------
Regards -

- Andrew


From: Howard Kaikow on
On 1/22/2010 17:12, John wrote:
> Howard Kaikow wrote:
>> On 1/15/2010 07:49, Gordon Potter wrote:
>>> OnLine Quicken in a few weeks, Software 5 years max.
>>>
>>> I expect Quicken 2011 for Windows to be the last version - unless they
>>> choose to skip 2011 and make a 2012 version.
>>>
>>> I doubt there will be any new Mac versions.
>>>
>>> http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2010/tc2010018_451437.htm
>>>
>>
>> Thanx for the posting. I guess that there's no point in buying Quicken.
>> I was about to run out today and purchase Quicken Home and Business
>> 2010, as well as the Quicken Official Guide.
>>
>> I have not been a Quicken user tho I did try the trial version of
>> Quicken Premier 2007.
>>
>> I would never use the web based version of ANY software that required
>> access to my private info.

Well, I decided to buy the Home and Business EDition 2010 anyway.

Why?

Because several years ago I realized that I could not justify paying for
Quicken to do the tasks I needed. I could do them all in Excel.
Not to mention I noticed at least the following problems with Quicken
Premier 2007 Trial:

1. Could not download more than most recent 90 days of data.
2. Transactions were not always reported correctly.

I also, realized that, as a programmer, I could easily write programs to
enhance my use of Excel in particular areas.

When I mentioned this to the reps at my broker, they encouraged me to
make the program available to others. I am in the process of finishing
up the supporting programs. I hope to finish up this year. I expect that
all but 1 of the programs will be free for others to use.

I purchased Quicken yesterday, so I could compare results with Excel and
the output options. Otherwise I have no need to use Quicken.
From: speedlever on
Ah Parsons Technology! Where are you when we need you? I really liked their
DOS product back in the day before Intuit bought them out.

Gordon Potter wrote in news:uro0l5pq4aaqnt8v4dq5li301898hnfart(a)4ax.com:

> OnLine Quicken in a few weeks, Software 5 years max.
>
> I expect Quicken 2011 for Windows to be the last version - unless they
> choose to skip 2011 and make a 2012 version.
>
> I doubt there will be any new Mac versions.
>
> http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2010/tc2010018_451437
> .htm
>
> -
> Email will be:
> 2Cybers at gmail-dot-com
>
> Gordon Potter
> Atlanta, GA
> USA

From: Jeff on
On 1/23/2010 1:31 AM, Howard Kaikow wrote:
> On 1/22/2010 17:12, John wrote:
>> Howard Kaikow wrote:
>>> On 1/15/2010 07:49, Gordon Potter wrote:
>>>> OnLine Quicken in a few weeks, Software 5 years max.
>>>>
>>>> I expect Quicken 2011 for Windows to be the last version - unless they
>>>> choose to skip 2011 and make a 2012 version.
>>>>
>>>> I doubt there will be any new Mac versions.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2010/tc2010018_451437.htm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanx for the posting. I guess that there's no point in buying Quicken.
>>> I was about to run out today and purchase Quicken Home and Business
>>> 2010, as well as the Quicken Official Guide.
>>>
>>> I have not been a Quicken user tho I did try the trial version of
>>> Quicken Premier 2007.
>>>
>>> I would never use the web based version of ANY software that required
>>> access to my private info.
>
> Well, I decided to buy the Home and Business EDition 2010 anyway.
>
> Why?
>
> Because several years ago I realized that I could not justify paying for
> Quicken to do the tasks I needed. I could do them all in Excel.
> Not to mention I noticed at least the following problems with Quicken
> Premier 2007 Trial:
>
> 1. Could not download more than most recent 90 days of data.
> 2. Transactions were not always reported correctly.
>
> I also, realized that, as a programmer, I could easily write programs to
> enhance my use of Excel in particular areas.
>
> When I mentioned this to the reps at my broker, they encouraged me to
> make the program available to others. I am in the process of finishing
> up the supporting programs. I hope to finish up this year. I expect that
> all but 1 of the programs will be free for others to use.
>
> I purchased Quicken yesterday, so I could compare results with Excel and
> the output options. Otherwise I have no need to use Quicken.

It does seem obvious that one "should" be able to do everything in
Excel, The problem is few of us are expert enough to duplicate how
Quicken does it including the downloading capability and easy interface.

If you know how to do everything pretty much in Excel you could either
make a fortune selling how you do it or share it with the rest of us who
do not know how. :-))

Jeff
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Prev: Quicken 2008 Annuity
Next: Crossed accounts