Prev: Novel Transistor Design Reemerges After 85 Years
Next: Republicans don't know a word, republic -- BP's cap&trade is before Senate!
From: Benj on 20 Jul 2010 15:50
On Jul 20, 2:21 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN MAGAZINE: Look Ma, No Junctions! Novel Transistor
> Design Reemerges After 85 Years
> A radically simpler design avoids the standard  p-n  semiconductor junctionshttp://links.email.scientificamerican.com/ctt?kn=15&m=35615357&r=NTM5...

Remember "Sam Wormley" He's the guy who thinks the sky is falling...
or at least warming enough to threaten us all with death! Forget the
destruction of the food chain in the gulf, the real danger is plants
sucking in too much CO2 and growing too fast!

And Remember Scientific American? That so-called "scientific" journal
that has tried to replace science with politics? You know, the guys
sponsoring the censorship of discussions in Physics Forums?

Well, you need no further evidence of the "quality" of the "science"
from both these clown sources than this article. Probably one of the
worst pieces of scientific writing ever, and showing absolutely ZERO
understanding of the field by anyone involved except the numerous
persons who emailed SA to comment on how stooopid they were!

So THIS is the "quality science" that "moderation" is attempting to
maintain. Not much different than going on twitter and spewing
brainless pointless remarks. So I guess it fits the "modern" world.
Has modern "science" sunk as low as this article seems to imply?

That's right Linda, the BLUE ROOM!

I haven't seen a breakthrough this big since MIT discovered energy
transmission right through the air using electromagnetic induction!

From: spudnik on 20 Jul 2010 21:30
<deletives impleted>

well, fairly interesting, or would be wihtout the usual zero-level of
math in SA;
more interesting to me is that it admitted that it was "owned by
Nature Publishing."

how long has that been going on, and does it explain the decidely
status-quo nature
of the God-am magazine?

--BP's cap&trade bill is before the Senate, and it is no-different
than Waxman's '91 cap&trade bill -- except that the WSUrinal calls it,
inexplicably, Captain Tax!
http://tarpley.net/online-books/against-oligarchy/

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Novel Transistor Design Reemerges After 85 Years
Next: Republicans don't know a word, republic -- BP's cap&trade is before Senate!