From: bill on
On Aug 5, 6:22 pm, Gerry Myerson <ge...(a)maths.mq.edi.ai.i2u4email>
wrote:
> In article
> <bf978706-879b-4062-80de-dcb8c13c2...(a)h40g2000pro.googlegroups.com>,
>
>  bill <b92...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > So I need to prove that Sqrt(I) cannot be a
> > repeating decimal.
>
> > Let Sqrt(I) = A/B
>
> > If A & B are integers, then (A^2)/(B^2) is an
> > integer iff (B^2) is a factor of (A^2).
> > Then B is a factor of A.
>
> Ah. How do you get from b^2 divides a^2 to b divides a?
> That's the crux of the matter - it's not hard, but it does
> require proof.
>
> > Then A/B is an integer.
>
> > Therefore,if Sqrt(I)is not an integer, it is not  rational.
>
> > I suppose that if I looked hard enough, I would
> > learn that this analysis has already been
> > accomplished?
>
> Really, you don't have to look very hard at all.
> Many many many intro number theory texts
> will tell you all about this.
>
> --
> Gerry Myerson (ge...(a)maths.mq.edi.ai) (i -> u for email)

Given If B^2/A^2 is an integer, then B/A is an
integer.

If B is prime, B^2 is divisible only 1, B or B^2.
Then A is 1, or B

If B is not prime, then B is the product of several
prime factors.

The prime factors of B^2 consist solely of the
prime factors of B.

If B^2 is divisible by A^2, then all of the prime factors of A^2 are
prime factors of B^2.

The prime factors of B^2 are prime factors of B.

The prime factors of A^2 are prime factors of A.

Then, the prime factors of A are prime factors of B.

Therefore, A is a factor of B.
From: bill on
On Aug 6, 11:15 am, Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybrea...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Aug 5, 5:55 pm, bill <b92...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "A regular number, also called a finite decimal (Havil 2003, p. 25),
> > is a positive number that has a finite decimal  expansion."
>
> > I don't know what "....." means. If it means
> > "expand infinitely", then 3.99999..... is not
> > a finite decimal.
>
> Sigh.  From your quote above, I extract the words:
>
> "has a finite decimal  expansion"
>
> Note the quantifier,  "a".  The integer 4 has a finite decimal
> expansion.  It fact, it has infinitely many different finite
> decimal expansions.  4.0,  4.00,  4.000, .....
>
> It also has an infinite decimal expansion:  3.999999999........
>
> Note that the text you quoted did NOT say "a UNIQUE finite decimal
> expansion".

You should take this up with the editors of
MathWorld.
From: Gerry on
On Aug 7, 8:02 am, bill <b92...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Aug 5, 6:22 pm, Gerry Myerson <ge...(a)maths.mq.edi.ai.i2u4email>
> wrote:

> > Ah. How do you get from b^2 divides a^2 to b divides a?
> > That's the crux of the matter - it's not hard, but it does
> > require proof.

> Given If B^2/A^2 is an integer, then B/A is an
> integer.
>
> If B is prime, B^2 is divisible only 1, B or B^2.
> Then A is 1, or B
>
> If B is not prime, then B is the product of several
> prime factors.
>
> The prime factors of B^2 consist solely of the
> prime factors of B.
>
> If B^2 is divisible by A^2, then all of the prime factors of A^2 are
> prime factors of B^2.
>
> The prime factors of B^2 are prime factors of B.
>
> The prime factors of A^2 are prime factors of A.
>
> Then, the prime factors of A are prime factors of B.
>
> Therefore, A is a factor of B.

You had me until that last line.

The prime factors of 18 are prime factors of 12.
Therefore, 18 is a factor of 12.

Back to the drawing board, Bill.
--
GM
From: Bart Goddard on
bill <b92057(a)yahoo.com> wrote in news:565a678d-2104-41db-bc33-
5f470e07c56b(a)m35g2000prn.googlegroups.com:

> On Aug 6, 11:15�am, Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybrea...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>> On Aug 5, 5:55�pm, bill <b92...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > "A regular number, also called a finite decimal (Havil 2003, p. 25),
>> > is a positive number that has a finite decimal �expansion."
>>
>> > I don't know what "....." means. If it means
>> > "expand infinitely", then 3.99999..... is not
>> > a finite decimal.
>>
>> Sigh. �From your quote above, I extract the words:
>>
>> "has a finite decimal �expansion"
>>
>> Note the quantifier, �"a". �The integer 4 has a finite decimal
>> expansion. �It fact, it has infinitely many different finite
>> decimal expansions. �4.0, �4.00, �4.000, .....
>>
>> It also has an infinite decimal expansion: �3.999999999........
>>
>> Note that the text you quoted did NOT say "a UNIQUE finite decimal
>> expansion".
>
> You should take this up with the editors of
> MathWorld.
>

No, MathWorld has it right. You have it wrong. By the
MathWorld definition, 3.9999..... is a finite decimal. You
said you were using this defintion, yet declared that 3.9999....
is NOT a finite decimal. This shows that you're using it
incorrectly. If your definitions are munged, then there's
no way your proof can be correct.


--
Cheerfully resisting change since 1959.
From: Virgil on
In article
<38d15a0a-0045-419e-bb28-3c5bafb41373(a)o7g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
bill <b92057(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Aug 5, 6:22�pm, Gerry Myerson <ge...(a)maths.mq.edi.ai.i2u4email>
> wrote:
> > In article
> > <bf978706-879b-4062-80de-dcb8c13c2...(a)h40g2000pro.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> > �bill <b92...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > So I need to prove that Sqrt(I) cannot be a
> > > repeating decimal.
> >
> > > Let Sqrt(I) = A/B
> >
> > > If A & B are integers, then (A^2)/(B^2) is an
> > > integer iff (B^2) is a factor of (A^2).
> > > Then B is a factor of A.
> >
> > Ah. How do you get from b^2 divides a^2 to b divides a?
> > That's the crux of the matter - it's not hard, but it does
> > require proof.
> >
> > > Then A/B is an integer.
> >
> > > Therefore,if Sqrt(I)is not an integer, it is not �rational.
> >
> > > I suppose that if I looked hard enough, I would
> > > learn that this analysis has already been
> > > accomplished?
> >
> > Really, you don't have to look very hard at all.
> > Many many many intro number theory texts
> > will tell you all about this.
> >
> > --
> > Gerry Myerson (ge...(a)maths.mq.edi.ai) (i -> u for email)
>
> Given If B^2/A^2 is an integer, then B/A is an
> integer.
>
> If B is prime, B^2 is divisible only 1, B or B^2.
> Then A is 1, or B
>
> If B is not prime, then B is the product of several
> prime factors.
>
> The prime factors of B^2 consist solely of the
> prime factors of B.
>
> If B^2 is divisible by A^2, then all of the prime factors of A^2 are
> prime factors of B^2.
>
> The prime factors of B^2 are prime factors of B.

>
> The prime factors of A^2 are prime factors of A.
>
> Then, the prime factors of A are prime factors of B.
>
> Therefore, A is a factor of B.

Suppose A = 12 and B = 6.

The prime factors of 12 are all prime factors of 6 but 12 is not a
factor of 6.

Oops.