Is Free Fall Inertial or Not?
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Points and Solid. Electron vs Earth.
Next: Thanks, Peter Webb...Re: To "paparios"....was: Re: Experts doubtEinstein..... but Einstein Dingleberries still worship him
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 17 Jun 2010 17:37 I hate to resurrect an old problem but relativists seem divided and quite mystified by this question. Can an object whose dh/dt is not zero be classed as being in an inertial state? Henry Wilson... ........Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
From: BURT on 17 Jun 2010 18:20 On Jun 17, 2:37 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > I hate to resurrect an old problem but relativists seem divided and quite > mystified by this question. > > Can an object whose dh/dt is not zero be classed as being in an inertial state? > > Henry Wilson... > > .......Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space. When falling matter's energy is becoming kinetic. Mass becomes motion toward center of gravity when in freefall. So energy of motion keeps the total mass conserved. When stopping and becomming still in gravity motion energy is transfered in momentum and takes its mass with it. Therefore mass is lowered in gravity when mass stops falling and turns into heat by conservation. Einstein says the object settles down with lesser than fundamental mass. He sees time as doing it. Crossing vector with killing vector I maintain it is the strength of gravity itself. It is a push principle. Mitch Raemsch
From: Inertial on 17 Jun 2010 19:15 "Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message news:b35l1691poleeun5qagvoc7dj3k3i3kp6k(a)4ax.com... > I hate to resurrect an old problem Its your problem .. not that of phsyics. You just haven't learn anything since lasttime > but relativists seem divided and quite > mystified by this question. No > Can an object whose dh/dt is not zero be classed as being in an inertial > state? in GR, An object in free fall can be considered the same as an inertial system for local experiments only. Look up the Principle of Equivalence.
From: BURT on 17 Jun 2010 19:40
On Jun 17, 4:15 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in messagenews:b35l1691poleeun5qagvoc7dj3k3i3kp6k(a)4ax.com... > > > I hate to resurrect an old problem > > Its your problem .. not that of phsyics. You just haven't learn anything > since lasttime > > > but relativists seem divided and quite > > mystified by this question. > > No > > > Can an object whose dh/dt is not zero be classed as being in an inertial > > state? > > in GR, An object in free fall can be considered the same as an inertial > system for local experiments only. > > Look up the Principle of Equivalence. If the equivalance principle is right then the strength of gravity should correspond to a quantity of acceleration. And both it and acceleration have a limit. Gravity has a push limit in fall and also in weight. Mitch Raemsch |