Prev: Reference frames.....Re: Experts doubt Einstein..... but EinsteinDingleberries still worship him
Next: Is Free Fall Inertial or Not?
From: Sanny on 17 Jun 2010 16:15 We say Electrons are point particle. As they are too small to find the radius. Say in astronomy. Earth is Quite Big. For Planets like earth an Human is a point particle. If one plots Earth and a Human being on a same scale. Humans will look like a point particle. Simmilarly, If we take our whole Galaxy, Earth will look like a point particle. So, Electron is revolving arround nucleus same was as earth revolves arround Sun. Due to large scale we live in we are unable to detect Electrons radius. We use light waves to measure distances in small areas. Since we cannot produce lightwaves smaller than the size of electron we are unable to get accurate radius of Electron. Once we get some new way to magnify the Nucleus and Electrons with new Technology Lens. We will be able to see the real radius of Electron. Wait 10-20 yrs and you will know the Exact radius of Electron. As some new way of magnifying lenses will be created in near future. Bye Sanny Earn money Solving Physics Questions: http://www.getclub.com/Problems.php?cat=Physics Lots of interesting problems to Solve.
From: bert on 17 Jun 2010 16:40 On Jun 17, 4:15 pm, Sanny <softtank...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > We say Electrons are point particle. As they are too small to find the > radius. > > Say in astronomy. Earth is Quite Big. For Planets like earth an Human > is a point particle. If one plots Earth and a Human being on a same > scale. > > Humans will look like a point particle. > > Simmilarly, If we take our whole Galaxy, Earth will look like a point > particle. > > So, Electron is revolving arround nucleus same was as earth revolves > arround Sun. Due to large scale we live in we are unable to detect > Electrons radius. > > We use light waves to measure distances in small areas. Since we > cannot produce lightwaves smaller than the size of electron we are > unable to get accurate radius of Electron. > > Once we get some new way to magnify the Nucleus and Electrons with new > Technology Lens. We will be able to see the real radius of Electron. > > Wait 10-20 yrs and you will know the Exact radius of Electron. As some > new way of magnifying lenses will be created in near future. > > Bye > Sanny > > Earn money Solving Physics Questions: > > http://www.getclub.com/Problems.php?cat=Physics > > Lots of interesting problems to Solve. Electron now is a cloud. To say it rotates around protons like the Earth rotates around the Sun is blurry. Using macro physics in the micro realm is like comparing apples with bananas TheBert
From: Brad Guth on 17 Jun 2010 17:39 On Jun 17, 1:15 pm, Sanny <softtank...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > We say Electrons are point particle. As they are too small to find the > radius. > > Say in astronomy. Earth is Quite Big. For Planets like earth an Human > is a point particle. If one plots Earth and a Human being on a same > scale. > > Humans will look like a point particle. > > Simmilarly, If we take our whole Galaxy, Earth will look like a point > particle. > > So, Electron is revolving arround nucleus same was as earth revolves > arround Sun. Due to large scale we live in we are unable to detect > Electrons radius. > > We use light waves to measure distances in small areas. Since we > cannot produce lightwaves smaller than the size of electron we are > unable to get accurate radius of Electron. > > Once we get some new way to magnify the Nucleus and Electrons with new > Technology Lens. We will be able to see the real radius of Electron. > > Wait 10-20 yrs and you will know the Exact radius of Electron. As some > new way of magnifying lenses will be created in near future. > > Bye > Sanny > > Earn money Solving Physics Questions: > > http://www.getclub.com/Problems.php?cat=Physics > > Lots of interesting problems to Solve. Think of the electron(s) as the Oort could of the proton, and perhaps using gamma or shorter Planck wavelengths will eventually get that job of measuring the electron done. ~ BG
From: Double-A on 17 Jun 2010 18:55 On Jun 17, 2:39 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 17, 1:15 pm, Sanny <softtank...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > We say Electrons are point particle. As they are too small to find the > > radius. > > > Say in astronomy. Earth is Quite Big. For Planets like earth an Human > > is a point particle. If one plots Earth and a Human being on a same > > scale. > > > Humans will look like a point particle. > > > Simmilarly, If we take our whole Galaxy, Earth will look like a point > > particle. > > > So, Electron is revolving arround nucleus same was as earth revolves > > arround Sun. Due to large scale we live in we are unable to detect > > Electrons radius. > > > We use light waves to measure distances in small areas. Since we > > cannot produce lightwaves smaller than the size of electron we are > > unable to get accurate radius of Electron. > > > Once we get some new way to magnify the Nucleus and Electrons with new > > Technology Lens. We will be able to see the real radius of Electron. > > > Wait 10-20 yrs and you will know the Exact radius of Electron. As some > > new way of magnifying lenses will be created in near future. > > > Bye > > Sanny > > > Earn money Solving Physics Questions: > > >http://www.getclub.com/Problems.php?cat=Physics > > > Lots of interesting problems to Solve. > > Think of the electron(s) as the Oort could of the proton, and perhaps > using gamma or shorter Planck wavelengths will eventually get that job > of measuring the electron done. > > ~ BG Planck wavelength EM waves would be black holes and could tell you nothing. Double-A
From: Painius on 17 Jun 2010 19:17
"Double-A" <double-a3(a)hush.com> wrote in message... news:54ca18f2-f853-4c5c-b757-143283eea049(a)y4g2000yqy.googlegroups.com... On Jun 17, 2:39 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Think of the electron(s) as the Oort could of the proton, and perhaps > using gamma or shorter Planck wavelengths will eventually get that job > of measuring the electron done. > > ~ BG Planck wavelength EM waves would be black holes . . . Double-A P I T A P I T A P I T A P I T A P I T A P I T A P I T A What brings you to this conclusion? happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Indelibly yours, Paine Ellsworth P.S.: "Only I can change my life. No one can do it for me." > Carol Burnett P.P.S.: http://www.painellsworth.net http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Paine_Ellsworth |