Is MBAM is a 100% safe application?
in [Viruses]
|
From: Max Wachtel on 14 May 2010 21:58 On Fri, 14 May 2010 21:27:56 -0400, Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk(a)earthling.net> wrote: > Max Wachtel wrote: >> The point is that the mod thought the image was in violation and >> his opinion is all that matters. BD was warned by the mod that >> the pic was unacceptable and that is that. He was banned. End of >> story. > > This is an exceptionally complex concept--one too involved for her tiny > little brain to comprehend. > I'll try to use small words. -- This post was created using Opera: http://www.opera.com Virus Removal Instructions http://sites.google.com/site/keepingwindowsclean/home Max's Favorite Freeware http://sites.google.com/site/keepingwindowsclean/freeware I am Max Wachtel and I approve this message.
From: David H. Lipman on 14 May 2010 23:21 From: "Max Wachtel" <maxpro4u(a)hotmail.com> | The point is that the mod thought the image was in violation and his | opinion is all that matters. BD was warned by the mod that the pic was | unacceptable and that is that. He was banned. End of story. No, he received no warning. After the 1st post with the attached graphic, the post was removed. After the 2cnd post, he was subsequently banned. -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
From: ~BD~ on 15 May 2010 03:12 ----- Original Message ----- From: "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> Newsgroups: alt.privacy.spyware,alt.comp.anti-virus,alt.comp.virus,microsoft.public.security.virus Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 4:21 AM Subject: Re: Is MBAM a 100% safe application? > From: "Max Wachtel" <maxpro4u(a)hotmail.com> > > | The point is that the mod thought the image was in violation and his > | opinion is all that matters. BD was warned by the mod that the pic > was > | unacceptable and that is that. He was banned. End of story. > > > No, he received no warning. Ah! The truth at last! :) I received NO warning. > After the 1st post with the attached graphic, the post was > removed. When I checked to make sure it was there - it wasn't. I know full well that things go awry when computing, so I simply re-posted the image NOT intending to cause offense - it was meant to be a bit of fun! > After the 2cnd post, he was subsequently banned. Indeed I was. A silly fit of pique in my opinion - unless there is more to this incident than meets the eye. A question for David Lipman - please advise - just *how* do you know that this is an accurate picture of what happened? Dustin Cook ( a Malwarebytes employee?) said a while ago, incorrectly, that a warning *was* issued! Folk reading here need to know whose word they can trust! -- Dave BD
From: Bullwinkle on 15 May 2010 07:03 So call off your fatass pig nose lap dog troll. "~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)nospam~@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:hslhqe$muv$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... -- Dave BD
From: David H. Lipman on 15 May 2010 07:28
From: "~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)nospam~@hotmail.co.uk> | ----- Original Message ----- | From: "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> | Newsgroups: | alt.privacy.spyware,alt.comp.anti-virus,alt.comp.virus,microsoft.public.security.virus | Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 4:21 AM | Subject: Re: Is MBAM a 100% safe application? >> From: "Max Wachtel" <maxpro4u(a)hotmail.com> >> | The point is that the mod thought the image was in violation and his >> | opinion is all that matters. BD was warned by the mod that the pic >> was >> | unacceptable and that is that. He was banned. End of story. >> No, he received no warning. | Ah! The truth at last! :) I received NO warning. >> After the 1st post with the attached graphic, the post was >> removed. | When I checked to make sure it was there - it wasn't. I know full well | that | things go awry when computing, so I simply re-posted the image NOT | intending | to cause offense - it was meant to be a bit of fun! >> After the 2cnd post, he was subsequently banned. | Indeed I was. A silly fit of pique in my opinion - unless there is more | to | this incident than meets the eye. | A question for David Lipman - please advise - just *how* do you know | that | this is an accurate picture of what happened? Dustin Cook ( a | Malwarebytes | employee?) said a while ago, incorrectly, that a warning *was* issued! | Folk | reading here need to know whose word they can trust! People know they can't trust YOU !~ It doesn't matter the content of the picture and it doesn't matter that you didn't receive a warning. Both are moot points just READ the AUP/ToS that YOU agreed to. Nothing in there states about and form of warning. All that matters is that you violated the AUP/ToS you agreed to and thus you were ToS'd. End of Story ! -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp |