From: Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries on 15 May 2010 10:29 David H. Lipman wrote: > From: "Max Wachtel" <maxpro4u(a)hotmail.com> > >> The point is that the mod thought the image was in violation and >> his opinion is all that matters. BD was warned by the mod that >> the pic was unacceptable and that is that. He was banned. End of >> story. > > > No, he received no warning. After the 1st post with the attached > graphic, the post was removed. For a normally intelligent person, the removal of the post would be warning enough. > After the 2cnd post, he was subsequently banned. He's not the sharpest knife in the drawer. -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously. Hubert H. Humphrey
From: David H. Lipman on 15 May 2010 10:50 From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk(a)earthling.net> | David H. Lipman wrote: >> From: "Max Wachtel" <maxpro4u(a)hotmail.com> >>> The point is that the mod thought the image was in violation and >>> his opinion is all that matters. BD was warned by the mod that >>> the pic was unacceptable and that is that. He was banned. End of >>> story. >> No, he received no warning. After the 1st post with the attached >> graphic, the post was removed. | For a normally intelligent person, the removal of the post would be warning | enough. >> After the 2cnd post, he was subsequently banned. | He's not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Not even an 'edge'. -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
From: Dustin Cook on 15 May 2010 14:17 "~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)nospam~@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in news:hslhqe$muv$1(a)news.eternal-september.org: >> No, he received no warning. > > Ah! The truth at last! :) I received NO warning. I mistakenly assumed that you would understand the picture being deleted was a warning not to do it again. My bad. I will try to be much more specific in exactly what I intend to say to you from here on out. > A question for David Lipman - please advise - just *how* do you know > that > this is an accurate picture of what happened? Dustin Cook ( a > Malwarebytes employee?) said a while ago, incorrectly, that a warning > *was* issued! Folk reading here need to know whose word they can > trust! Please read the comments I have already written above, slowly. Folk should also understand that Malwarebytes has nothing whatsoever to do with my posts here; and that I am a former employee, I have nothing whatsoever to do with Malwarebytes other than being a happy end user like the rest of you. BD clearly tries to make out more to a story than what is actually true. Thanks for your time, I know it's a total waste having to muddle thru this BS. -- "Hrrngh! Someday I'm going to hurl this...er...roll this...hrrngh.. nudge this boulder right down a cliff." - Goblin Warrior
From: Jenn on 16 May 2010 00:07 Dustin Cook wrote: > "~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)nospam~@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in > news:hslhqe$muv$1(a)news.eternal-september.org: > >>> No, he received no warning. >> >> Ah! The truth at last! :) I received NO warning. > > I mistakenly assumed that you would understand the picture being > deleted was a warning not to do it again. My bad. I will try to be > much more specific in exactly what I intend to say to you from here > on out. It's about time you let everyone know that Dave was telling the truth about not getting a warning. -- Jenn (from Oklahoma)
From: Peter Foldes on 16 May 2010 01:37
Jenn That is a warning. And he received it 2 times. I don't understand why he and yourself are the 2 only ones that do not understand that. Most all others and including myself know this. Instead of being in a chat group and if you would be participating in help groups then you would know this. Aside from this BD knows this quite well since it is not the first time around with similar deletions and explanations . He just played coy so as he can have sympathy and backup. Typical BD. Looks more and more that you are the dumb one. -- Peter Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged. http://www.microsoft.com/protect "Jenn" <nope(a)noway.atnohow.anyday> wrote in message news:hsnr1q$tnt$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > Dustin Cook wrote: >> "~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)nospam~@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in >> news:hslhqe$muv$1(a)news.eternal-september.org: >> >>>> No, he received no warning. >>> >>> Ah! The truth at last! :) I received NO warning. >> >> I mistakenly assumed that you would understand the picture being >> deleted was a warning not to do it again. My bad. I will try to be >> much more specific in exactly what I intend to say to you from here >> on out. > > It's about time you let everyone know that Dave was telling the truth about not > getting a warning. > > > -- > Jenn (from Oklahoma) > |