Prev: Is (or not) all the E.M. energy of a mass "m", that "m" multiplied by the E.M. Unitary Energy?
Next: Quantum Gravity 404.5: 2 Paradoxes: Portugal's Theory of Curvature-Bending Spacecraft (Gravitation), and Exobiology's Power-Crazy Hedonism
From: Helmut Wabnig hwabnig on 29 Jul 2010 07:25
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:04:15 -0700 (PDT), Romano Amodeo
<ra.amodeo(a)libero.it> wrote:

>Please, open:
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fkfy1LSVXXI
>
>It is clear that all the ENERGY of a E.M. mass "m", is obtained by:
>"m" times the UNITARY E.M. Energy.
>It is possible to get it by valuations.
>
>10 dm = 1 m, and the unitary SPACE is formed by 10 dm^3 put in
>sequence, whose lenght is 1 m and whose section is 1 dm^2.
>
>Now THE ABSOLUTE, of dm^3 10 is given by dm^3 10^10 = m^3 10^7.
>It is the UNITARY PRESENCE of 1 m^3.
>When this m^3 10^7 of PRESENCE exists in 10 times of presence, we have
>that 10 times 10^7 m^3 are 10^8 m^3... in the unit of the time of 1 s.
>
>So 10^8 m^3 s^-1 are also THE SAME 10^8 m s^-1 in line, since the
>section of 1 m^2 having that speed.
>So the speed of 1 m^2 is of 10^8 m s^-1 in each of the 3 dimensions
>xyz of the space, referring the VOLUME of this m^3.
>Therefore, in all these 3 directions, the speed of 1 m^2 is 3 times
>10^8 m s^-1.
>
>This C (THEORETICAL) speed (of 3 times 10^8 m s^-1) is as electric, as
>magnetic.
>The ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY is the product between the C and the equal
>C... so it is C^2.
>
>It is the simultaneous advancement Electric and Magnetic of the
>UNITARY MASS contained in 1 m^3 of Electromagnetism.
>Now, the C (REAL) isn't the speed of 1 m^2, but of 1,0006922855 m^2
>containing 1 m^2 as SPACE-UNIT and +0,0006922855 as TIME-UNIT... the
>precise unitary time equal to m^2 1444,4905513100^-1, getting m^2
>0,0006922855 (since m 10^-10 dimension, that is the unit Angstrom, of
>the atomic space).
>
>Romano Amodeo EXPLAINS IT IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE only in this shape on
>youtube:
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fkfy1LSVXXI
>
>It is of the MOST IMPORTANCE, because it corrects even a mistaken of
>EINSTEIN... and excuse me if it is so insignificant !!!
>
>Amoram

Your English is good enough, but your thinking is rotten.
That video is the most stupid thing I ever have seen.
Why are you making a fool of yourself?

w.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Is (or not) all the E.M. energy of a mass "m", that "m" multiplied by the E.M. Unitary Energy?
Next: Quantum Gravity 404.5: 2 Paradoxes: Portugal's Theory of Curvature-Bending Spacecraft (Gravitation), and Exobiology's Power-Crazy Hedonism