Is photography going downhill with digital?
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Lens question
Next: Photo in the night
From: Savageduck on 4 Nov 2009 10:01 On 2009-11-04 06:24:05 -0800, Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> said: > In message <jdr2f5lm8n2hf9trp4ojpvh4g2sl5t8vc8(a)4ax.com>, Data Point > <datapoint(a)someisp.org> writes >> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 08:56:43 +0000, Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote: >> >>> <-------------------------------------Le >>> Snip------------------------------------------------> > So you say > >> Contrary to your misguided, misinformed, and inexperienced >> opinion. > > > But Datapoint(a)someisp.org has no experience so any experience I have is > greater. If you have the experience you claim you will have no problem > identifying yourself. He is never going to truly identify himself since it is our P&S pal of many names. -- Regards, Savageduck
From: Chris H on 4 Nov 2009 11:40 In message <2009110407011050073-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom>, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> writes >On 2009-11-04 06:24:05 -0800, Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> said: > >> In message <jdr2f5lm8n2hf9trp4ojpvh4g2sl5t8vc8(a)4ax.com>, Data Point >> <datapoint(a)someisp.org> writes >>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 08:56:43 +0000, Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote: >>> >>>> <-------------------------------------Le Snip--------------------- >>>>---------------------------> > > > >> So you say >> >>> Contrary to your misguided, misinformed, and inexperienced >>> opinion. >> But Datapoint(a)someisp.org has no experience so any experience I >>have is >> greater. If you have the experience you claim you will have no problem >> identifying yourself. > >He is never going to truly identify himself since it is our P&S pal of >many names. I suspected as much. If he has done half as much as he claims he would be able to point us to a web site full of his work. -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
From: Data Point on 4 Nov 2009 17:32 On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:24:03 +0100, van dark <van.dark(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >Hallo Data point, >please, say me which camera is exactly perfectly right >for your job. My job is similar one. >Thanks. For that particular extended wilderness trek back then (there's been many more months-long treks since, and newer cameras bought since then), I used a Sony F717 with the VCL-HQD1758 tel-extender. The best in any cameras and optics that I could find that year. They had no equals for durability, dependability, image quality, and the widest range of capabilities with its included macro, IR imaging, and higher EVF resolution than many present-day cameras. As well as the unique and extremely handy swiveling body that allows you to also use the EVF, not just the LCD, in awkward framing situations. I wish they'd make cameras like that again. Few cameras even today can beat the images from that model. Newer is not always better. 5-megapixels is more than anyone needs for 11"x14" prints (and larger, subject dependent) if the optics and sensor are good. 3 megapixels was already shown to compete with the finest-grain 35mm films many years ago.
From: Outing Trolls is FUN! on 4 Nov 2009 17:34 On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:01:10 -0800, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >On 2009-11-04 06:24:05 -0800, Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> said: > >> In message <jdr2f5lm8n2hf9trp4ojpvh4g2sl5t8vc8(a)4ax.com>, Data Point >> <datapoint(a)someisp.org> writes >>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 08:56:43 +0000, Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote: >>> >>>> <-------------------------------------Le >>>> Snip------------------------------------------------> > > > >> So you say >> >>> Contrary to your misguided, misinformed, and inexperienced >>> opinion. >> >> >> But Datapoint(a)someisp.org has no experience so any experience I have is >> greater. If you have the experience you claim you will have no problem >> identifying yourself. > >He is never going to truly identify himself since it is our P&S pal of >many names. And you're just a useless poorly snapshooting DSLR-Troll of one name(?) this year. LOL!
From: Data Point on 4 Nov 2009 17:40
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:40:35 +0000, Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote: >In message <2009110407011050073-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom>, Savageduck ><savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> writes >>On 2009-11-04 06:24:05 -0800, Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> said: >> >>> In message <jdr2f5lm8n2hf9trp4ojpvh4g2sl5t8vc8(a)4ax.com>, Data Point >>> <datapoint(a)someisp.org> writes >>>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 08:56:43 +0000, Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> <-------------------------------------Le Snip--------------------- >>>>>---------------------------> >> >> >> >>> So you say >>> >>>> Contrary to your misguided, misinformed, and inexperienced >>>> opinion. >>> But Datapoint(a)someisp.org has no experience so any experience I >>>have is >>> greater. If you have the experience you claim you will have no problem >>> identifying yourself. >> >>He is never going to truly identify himself since it is our P&S pal of >>many names. > >I suspected as much. If he has done half as much as he claims he would >be able to point us to a web site full of his work. Totally removed from the net about 4 years ago because useless trolls like you were stealing them. One of the 8 or so websites had over 500 images posted from only one of my yearly wilderness-treks. All gone, thanks to useless DSLR trolls like you. Boo hoo. Too bad. As if any self-respecting person on earth would ever want to enrich your basement-living trolls' life for free. LOL! |