JAMES RANDI 5 QUESTION TEST
in [Math]
|
From: |-|ercules on 3 May 2010 21:02 "george" <gblack(a)hnpl.net> wrote ... > On May 3, 8:18 pm, "|-|ercules" <milliondollarfr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> NO CALCULATORS NO COMPUTERS > > > What a great idea. No more herc the burke demented posts. George did you see the psychic channel video I did about your snarly posts? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FW6RzA5UAm0 Herc
From: Sylvia Else on 3 May 2010 22:37 On 4/05/2010 1:48 AM, |-|ercules wrote: > "i|||| | | || ||| || |||| 2.0" <i| || ||| ||||| |||||| 2.0> wrote > >> "Sylvia Else" <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote in message >> news:4bdede8b$0$32083$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... >> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Pythagoras knew about prime numbers 2500 years ago and worked out a >>>> formula >>>> for determining them. He didn't need calculators nor computers. >>>> Thymaridas >>>> and Euclid knew about them too. Why are you so hell bound to >>>> demonstrate >>>> your ignorance? >>> >>> I suspect that herc has latched onto the difficulty of factoring >>> large composite numbers. It is indeed diffcult, and I certainly >>> wouldn't be able to find a factor of the second one by hand. >> >> herc says these channels cannot be used to test them >> if they can't be used they aren't useful >> the channels don't even realise herc is fooling them by using videos >> as proof > > > NO, merely that trivial pursuit questions will not work. > > So you can't run a biology exam style test, you have to have a blind > umpire and controls to overcome the subjectiveness of the answers. > > I have one rule, you MUST be interested in the answer. JR already knows > what color his cat is. If he was blind and nobody ever told him his > cat's color then sure it would work. If the 'answers' were saying anything relevant, then the rule would be significant. But as it is, it makes no difference, because you're not getting answers, right or wrong. You just getting what is gibberish in context, and then supplying your own answer. Sylvia.
From: |-|ercules on 3 May 2010 22:59 "Sylvia Else" <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote > On 4/05/2010 1:48 AM, |-|ercules wrote: >> "i|||| | | || ||| || |||| 2.0" <i| || ||| ||||| |||||| 2.0> wrote > >>> "Sylvia Else" <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote in message >>> news:4bdede8b$0$32083$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... >>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Pythagoras knew about prime numbers 2500 years ago and worked out a >>>>> formula >>>>> for determining them. He didn't need calculators nor computers. >>>>> Thymaridas >>>>> and Euclid knew about them too. Why are you so hell bound to >>>>> demonstrate >>>>> your ignorance? >>>> >>>> I suspect that herc has latched onto the difficulty of factoring >>>> large composite numbers. It is indeed diffcult, and I certainly >>>> wouldn't be able to find a factor of the second one by hand. >>> >>> herc says these channels cannot be used to test them >>> if they can't be used they aren't useful >>> the channels don't even realise herc is fooling them by using videos >>> as proof >> >> >> NO, merely that trivial pursuit questions will not work. >> >> So you can't run a biology exam style test, you have to have a blind >> umpire and controls to overcome the subjectiveness of the answers. >> >> I have one rule, you MUST be interested in the answer. JR already knows >> what color his cat is. If he was blind and nobody ever told him his >> cat's color then sure it would work. > > If the 'answers' were saying anything relevant, then the rule would be > significant. But as it is, it makes no difference, because you're not > getting answers, right or wrong. You just getting what is gibberish in > context, and then supplying your own answer. > > Sylvia. You haven't even looked at the videos! The answers are PRECISE!!! 7 VIDEOS www.GENESISPROOF.com NOW No more general skeptics Occam's Razor, give me EXAMPLES Herc
From: |-|ercules on 3 May 2010 23:03 "george" <gblack(a)hnpl.net> wrote > On May 4, 1:02 pm, "|-|ercules" <milliondollarfr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> "george" <gbl...(a)hnpl.net> wrote ... >> >> > On May 3, 8:18 pm, "|-|ercules" <milliondollarfr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> NO CALCULATORS NO COMPUTERS >> >> > What a great idea. No more herc the burke demented posts. >> >> George did you see the psychic channel video I did about your snarly posts?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FW6RzA5UAm0 > > No. > Do you actually think that any-one is interested in your insanity ? > Have I got news for you ! > Kook groups deleted Take a lOOk fOOl The only people still mocking me are the ones who don't check the videos. vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv >>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FW6RzA5UAm0 <<<<<<<<<< ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Herc
From: Terrys on 3 May 2010 23:10
On May 4, 11:59 am, "|-|ercules" <milliondollarfr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > You haven't even looked at the videos! The answers are PRECISE!!! There are indeed. You must have been very smart at school Herc! It's clear that you were in the `academic', not the `technical' stream, back in the days when an ability with polysyllabilic nominatives was granted greater `status' than the ability to actually do anything. Your answers are very `precise'. Utterly useless, but precise. Ignore the books, find a second week trades apprentice if you have difficulty parsing this. |