JAMES RANDI 5 QUESTION TEST
in [Math]
|
From: |-|ercules on 6 May 2010 07:40 "Terrys" <merryterrys(a)gmail.com> wrote .. > >> 4,000 words, don't publically accuse me of anything ever until you've digested > > Still making demands Cooper? You demand that you will set the rules > regarding other peoples money, you demand that some poor girl whose > either never heard of you, or wishes she hadn't, acceed to your > pathetic masturbation fantasies, and you demand that people who refuse > to accept your bizzare and deranged view of reality waste bandwidth > watching some pathetic portly red-neck wank on about his `mysterious > powers'. > Normally I'd have sympathy, but I interact daily with people who face > real challenges and problems with stoicicsm, humour and a detestation > of `pity', `sympathy' or patronising platitudes. The joke is I get > paid for it, whereas they have to put up with me for free. You, OTOH, > are a whining Legend in his own lunchbox who cannot seem to accept the > fact that he _doesn't_ make rules for anyone else, and the rules he > makes for himself invariably cause decent reasonable people concern. > > I don't accuse you, I report who you are. > > http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200203/s499777.htm > > Reflect on the fact that your entire defence seems to be `It was > pathetic'. > > Says it all, really. Another contender for www.MartinTheMonkey.com !!!! You obviously didn't read the australianpolice site if you're still quoting the news articles which I clearly demonstrate as false. Take a look fool, the actual extortion letter is published on the site. The topic of the letter was "by name by nature" and it was to Skeptics(a)KASM.com Join the capitals and you get S(a)KASM! By name by nature, such a simple concept, but too mysterious for a skeptic to even test the hypothesis. Herc |