JSH: Maybe they're fakes?
in [Math]
|
Prev: JSH: Poll: Collected responses to JSH work in one place?
Next: Really Poor Wiki Article On Hard & Soft Science
From: Chip Eastham on 14 Jul 2010 10:51 On Jul 14, 10:07 am, Mark Murray <w.h.o...(a)example.com> wrote: > On 07/14/10 14:56, JSH wrote: > > > prime gap equation = resolution of Twin Primes Conjecture > > In your dreams. > > > Math people would presumably make that connection but some VERY > > obsessive posters, did not. > > I must be obsessive, then. > > M I thought I was doing pretty good, because I got the Highlander reference in the last thread. But frankly JSH blew me away with: > > prime gap equation = resolution of Twin Primes Conjecture [unless maybe, that _is_ the prime gap equation!] and I do not even understand whether he's saying the conjecture is proven or disproven. And you, Mark, have completely baffled me with this deduction that you must be obsessive. It will have me obsessing for days. regards, chip
From: David C. Ullrich on 14 Jul 2010 11:59 On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:37:47 -0400, "Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote: >JSH <jstevh(a)gmail.com> writes: > >> prime gap equation = resolution of Twin Primes Conjecture > >You keep saying this. You have the prime gap equation, so why not >resolve the conjecture? You expect him to do _all_ the work. Must be tough being him.
From: Mark Murray on 14 Jul 2010 12:14 On 07/14/10 16:59, David C. Ullrich wrote: >> You keep saying this. You have the prime gap equation, so why not >> resolve the conjecture? > > You expect him to do _all_ the work. Must be tough being him. By being allowed to insult him, you can be granted the honour of doing the mechanics of such trivial details for him. M
From: adamk on 14 Jul 2010 09:00 > > > Not YOU, you nincompoops as you apparently actually > know at least some > math. > > And NONE of you fell for the trap. > > I'm talking about the people who did. > > prime gap equation = resolution of Twin Primes > Conjecture > > Math people would presumably make that connection but > some VERY > obsessive posters, did not. > The sad reality is that 99% of the people read your posts for entertainment; to see you make an idiot of yourself, and, even more sadly, you never disappoint in this area. Why not get some self-respect and stop embarrassing yourself in front of every one; the cliche' applies here perfectly: people who read your posts are laughing _at you_, not with you. Get yourself some help. > > James Harris
From: sue sa on 14 Jul 2010 13:23
"JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:a7fe74f4-ef94-47c4-82c8-6957f003149b(a)z30g2000prg.googlegroups.com... On Jul 14, 4:38 am, Jos� Carlos Santos <jcsan...(a)fc.up.pt> wrote: > On 14-07-2010 12:08, David C. Ullrich wrote: > > >> I've wondered for years if maybe there are people who've been hired to > >> argue with me, who are trained in psychological operations and not > >> mathematics. > >> > Oh my god you've figured it out. >> >> > No, wait, what I meant to say was no, that's crazy. No, nobody >> > hired to argue with you, nobody at all. (The society's >> > secret password is "rutabaga", if anyone wants to join.) >> >> Oh! That's why I was unable to log in. I thought that it was "rutabuga". >> Thanks a lot! :-) >Not YOU, you nincompoops as you apparently actually know at least some >math. do nincompoops know math ? > >And NONE of you fell for the trap. your trap did not work, typical, try again. > >I'm talking about the people who did. who did what? > >prime gap equation = resolution of Twin Primes Conjecture Wrong again. Only a nincompoop would say that. > >Math people would presumably make that connection but some VERY >obsessive posters, did not. what is a "Math people" ? > > >James Harris |