Prev: where we have a new understanding of what factorial means in 254! = 10^500 #648 Correcting Math
Next: JSH: To my Chinese fans--thanks!!!
From: Mark Murray on 12 Jul 2010 03:20 On 12/07/2010 03:36, JSH wrote: >> Not universally, I think you'll find. I don't pay enough attention to >> note the effects, but I have seen mild forms of support given without >> the lashing you claim happens all the time. > > Irrelevant. I've noted an odd benefit to the hostility anyway--people > are afraid to extend my research, at least in posts on Usenet. I have noted very many improvements to your postings. You are an apallingly bad listener, so I'm not surprised you haven't noticed this. M -- Mark "No Nickname" Murray Notable nebbish, extreme generalist.
From: JSH on 12 Jul 2010 09:54 On Jul 12, 12:20 am, Mark Murray <w.h.o...(a)example.com> wrote: > On 12/07/2010 03:36, JSH wrote: > > >> Not universally, I think you'll find. I don't pay enough attention to > >> note the effects, but I have seen mild forms of support given without > >> the lashing you claim happens all the time. > > > Irrelevant. I've noted an odd benefit to the hostility anyway--people > > are afraid to extend my research, at least in posts on Usenet. > > I have noted very many improvements to your postings. You are an > apallingly bad listener, so I'm not surprised you haven't noticed > this. See! An insult. Now you'll work indefinitely on various problems I present. I notice such things and know that you're still looking to work for me. Or do you deny that you were insulting there? I'm sure you'll claim you're only being factual. I don't care how you rationalize as long as when needed, you WORK for me, like before. ___JSH
From: tinytwo claws on 12 Jul 2010 13:50 "JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:25cb20c7-dae1-4e55-8060-7ab5b1ae5439(a)a14g2000pro.googlegroups.com... On Jul 12, 12:20 am, Mark Murray <w.h.o...(a)example.com> wrote: > On 12/07/2010 03:36, JSH wrote: > > >> Not universally, I think you'll find. I don't pay enough attention to >> >> note the effects, but I have seen mild forms of support given without >> >> the lashing you claim happens all the time. >> >> > Irrelevant. I've noted an odd benefit to the hostility anyway--people >> > are afraid to extend my research, at least in posts on Usenet. >> >> I have noted very many improvements to your postings. You are an >> apallingly bad listener, so I'm not surprised you haven't noticed >> this. >See! An insult. Now you'll work indefinitely on various problems I >present. > >I notice such things and know that you're still looking to work for >me. > >Or do you deny that you were insulting there? > >I'm sure you'll claim you're only being factual. > >I don't care how you rationalize as long as when needed, you WORK for >me, like before. > > >___JSH Now you are backsliding with this post, JSH, into your ugly insulting posting that you like to do. It is un-professional. A red herring, to detract attention from your failed math. Perhaps you do not see this, however, the rest of the world does, it is ugly. It is JSH hostility and meanness.
From: Tegiri Nenashi on 12 Jul 2010 15:33 On Jul 11, 2:38 pm, Mark Murray <w.h.o...(a)example.com> wrote: > JSH May be wrong most of the time, but at least he's interestingly so. I'd suggest his writing style is among the best. Consider this cumulative sentence: <quote>But I guess the reality is that Usenet is a way to communicate, and it's not about getting angry at the forum, or even the format which allows a free-for-all, nor does it appear to be useful to get angry with the hostiles who will work like mad demons to make your life miserable, like the ones who stalk my posts. </quote> Alas, this is wrong newsgroup to appreciate these subtleties.
From: MichaelW on 12 Jul 2010 17:10
On Jul 12, 11:54 pm, JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 12, 12:20 am, Mark Murray <w.h.o...(a)example.com> wrote: > > > On 12/07/2010 03:36, JSH wrote: > > > >> Not universally, I think you'll find. I don't pay enough attention to > > >> note the effects, but I have seen mild forms of support given without > > >> the lashing you claim happens all the time. > > > > Irrelevant. I've noted an odd benefit to the hostility anyway--people > > > are afraid to extend my research, at least in posts on Usenet. > > > I have noted very many improvements to your postings. You are an > > apallingly bad listener, so I'm not surprised you haven't noticed > > this. > > See! An insult. Now you'll work indefinitely on various problems I > present. > > I notice such things and know that you're still looking to work for > me. > > Or do you deny that you were insulting there? > > I'm sure you'll claim you're only being factual. > > I don't care how you rationalize as long as when needed, you WORK for > me, like before. > > ___JSH James, If this is how you feel then can I expect an apology for calling me a liar earlier in this thread? Or do you deny you were insulting there? It has been often said that you have one standard for yourself and another for everyone else. Here is your chance to prove it wrong. Michael W. |