JSH: Prime gap equation, 3 years grace
in [Math]
|
Prev: DECLARED ASSERTION TO THE BEST MATHEMATICIAN OF CURRENT MATHEMATICS-- DR EDGAR ESCULTURA PHD, U.W MADISON ,1 and 0.999 a final resolution
Next: JSH: We must move on
From: JSH on 22 Jul 2010 22:08 Posters like to attack my prime residue axiom by picking on a single prime, like claiming that p mod 3 does show some kind of regularity, like today I saw a post saying 1 follows 2 or 2 follows 1 as a residue or something of that nature, when the full axiom covers ALL EVEN PRIME GAPS which leads to the prime gap equation. And I've noted there is only one. So the prime gap equation can be programmed, and used against all prime gaps out to millions upon millions of primes. That test I'm sure will end all rational debate. It is a test I have said I would not do for at least three years and I think I said that about a year ago, so there are around two years grace left for the mathematical and physics community as my results have implications for group theory as well. To end the grace period some dumbass would have to claim a twin primes conjecture proof and get credited for it, or claim a Goldbach's conjecture proof and get credit, and then I've said I could just go ahead and kill that noise by doing the above. So the math committees won't do it, I'm sure. So it's like you're wasting your time to try. No matter what "proof" you may think you have, you'll get shot down faster than Goldstone did (of course he was shot down before I ever said I wouldn't allow it). (The math error allows a "proof" of just about anything. So there may be people who have to be blocked by the math committee when they put forward an argument correct by the established mathematical ideas.) Which raises the question, if I can end the debate, why not just do it immediately? Well, if I do it, I'm certain there would still be a lot of arguing, and a lot more ignoring. It'd be an uphill climb with lots of denial, where I'd be pushing people against a wall. That's not safe for ME to do. Some of you may notice that I put things out there for others to do, as I think there's safety in numbers. And it's weird to me that there is the prime gap equation hanging out there. Which means there are these people going about their lives with this thing hanging over their heads. And it's curious that they would do so, but hey, you do what you feel like you have to do... Real world is a nasty place. It's competitive, and it's not some fictional story. People clash and fight over all kinds of things and it can get REALLY nasty. To most of you none of that matters as you're not important enough for it to matter. What you say on Usenet is as worthless as what you do in your daily lives. You CAN say anything. Few people, if any, actually care. But I'm one guy. I push math people just so far. And then I back down. Which has been going on for years, as I know that when it gets too nasty then people can get physical. So there is a three year grace which could be extended. Years can go by, and I've noted I'm getting comfortable with 2030 as I ponder this situation and see a math community that is settled into error at such a depth that more than likely, yes, things would get physically violent if I pushed too hard. That the human species will allow itself to be paused for that long could be about destiny. Truth can be too expensive you see. And at the end of the day, ignorance is the natural human condition for most. And it doesn't seem to keep them from doing the most important thing they do: reproduce. As long as people keep making babies, it doesn't matter much if their math is wrong. James Harris
From: MichaelW on 22 Jul 2010 22:23 On Jul 23, 12:08 pm, JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Posters like to attack my prime residue axiom by picking on a single > prime, like claiming that p mod 3 does show some kind of regularity, > like today I saw a post saying 1 follows 2 or 2 follows 1 as a residue > or something of that nature, when the full axiom covers ALL EVEN PRIME > GAPS which leads to the prime gap equation. And I've noted there is > only one. > > So the prime gap equation can be programmed, and used against all > prime gaps out to millions upon millions of primes. > > That test I'm sure will end all rational debate. I ran the test and published the results on sci.math back in Feb this year. For example listed below are the results for a gap of 8. So for example (reading the first line) the 10^5th prime is 1,299,709. Up to this prime there are 10,336 twins with a gap of 8. The prime gap equation predicts that there would be 11,457 which has a ratio to the real number of about 1.108 (that is, it is over by 10.8%). This ratio slowly increases to around 1.123.. which is 2*e^-g where g is Euler's constant. This ratio is predicted by modern number theory. 100000th prime is 1299709. Twin count is 10336. Prediction is 11457. Ratio is 1.108. Current prob is 0.105 200000th prime is 2750159. Twin count is 19482. Prediction is 21652. Ratio is 1.111. Current prob is 0.1 300000th prime is 4256233. Twin count is 28126. Prediction is 31468. Ratio is 1.119. Current prob is 0.097 400000th prime is 5800079. Twin count is 36623. Prediction is 41056. Ratio is 1.121. Current prob is 0.095 500000th prime is 7368787. Twin count is 45046. Prediction is 50481. Ratio is 1.121. Current prob is 0.093 600000th prime is 8960453. Twin count is 53330. Prediction is 59772. Ratio is 1.121. Current prob is 0.092 700000th prime is 10570841. Twin count is 61559. Prediction is 68968. Ratio is 1.12. Current prob is 0.092 800000th prime is 12195257. Twin count is 69707. Prediction is 78080. Ratio is 1.12. Current prob is 0.091 900000th prime is 13834103. Twin count is 77799. Prediction is 87114. Ratio is 1.12. Current prob is 0.09 1000000th prime is 15485863. Twin count is 85866. Prediction is 96082. Ratio is 1.119. Current prob is 0.089 1100000th prime is 17144489. Twin count is 93732. Prediction is 104991. Ratio is 1.12. Current prob is 0.089 1200000th prime is 18815231. Twin count is 101636. Prediction is 113849. Ratio is 1.12. Current prob is 0.088 1300000th prime is 20495843. Twin count is 109481. Prediction is 122662. Ratio is 1.12. Current prob is 0.088 1400000th prime is 22182343. Twin count is 117368. Prediction is 131433. Ratio is 1.12. Current prob is 0.088 1500000th prime is 23879519. Twin count is 125248. Prediction is 140166. Ratio is 1.119. Current prob is 0.087 1600000th prime is 25582153. Twin count is 132979. Prediction is 148863. Ratio is 1.119. Current prob is 0.087 1700000th prime is 27290279. Twin count is 140700. Prediction is 157525. Ratio is 1.12. Current prob is 0.086 1800000th prime is 29005541. Twin count is 148360. Prediction is 166159. Ratio is 1.12. Current prob is 0.086 1900000th prime is 30723761. Twin count is 156071. Prediction is 174763. Ratio is 1.12. Current prob is 0.086 2000000th prime is 32452843. Twin count is 163730. Prediction is 183337. Ratio is 1.12. Current prob is 0.086 2100000th prime is 34186049. Twin count is 171220. Prediction is 191885. Ratio is 1.121. Current prob is 0.085 2200000th prime is 35926307. Twin count is 178677. Prediction is 200404. Ratio is 1.122. Current prob is 0.085 2300000th prime is 37667659. Twin count is 186154. Prediction is 208905. Ratio is 1.122. Current prob is 0.085 2400000th prime is 39410867. Twin count is 193731. Prediction is 217382. Ratio is 1.122. Current prob is 0.085 2500000th prime is 41161739. Twin count is 201294. Prediction is 225834. Ratio is 1.122. Current prob is 0.084 2600000th prime is 42920191. Twin count is 208871. Prediction is 234267. Ratio is 1.122. Current prob is 0.084 2700000th prime is 44680319. Twin count is 216333. Prediction is 242683. Ratio is 1.122. Current prob is 0.084 2800000th prime is 46441207. Twin count is 223855. Prediction is 251080. Ratio is 1.122. Current prob is 0.084 2900000th prime is 48210713. Twin count is 231184. Prediction is 259457. Ratio is 1.122. Current prob is 0.084 3000000th prime is 49979687. Twin count is 238675. Prediction is 267816. Ratio is 1.122. Current prob is 0.083 > > It is a test I have said I would not do for at least three years and I > think I said that about a year ago, so there are around two years > grace left for the mathematical and physics community as my results > have implications for group theory as well. > > To end the grace period some dumbass would have to claim a twin primes > conjecture proof and get credited for it, or claim a Goldbach's > conjecture proof and get credit, and then I've said I could just go > ahead and kill that noise by doing the above. > Glad to help. Let me know if you want tests for alternate gaps; the code is flexible. > So the math committees won't do it, I'm sure. So it's like you're > wasting your time to try. No matter what "proof" you may think you > have, you'll get shot down faster than Goldstone did (of course he was > shot down before I ever said I wouldn't allow it). > > (The math error allows a "proof" of just about anything. So there may > be people who have to be blocked by the math committee when they put > forward an argument correct by the established mathematical ideas.) > > Which raises the question, if I can end the debate, why not just do it > immediately? > > Well, if I do it, I'm certain there would still be a lot of arguing, > and a lot more ignoring. It'd be an uphill climb with lots of denial, > where I'd be pushing people against a wall. That's not safe for ME to > do. Some of you may notice that I put things out there for others to > do, as I think there's safety in numbers. Speaking of denial, do you deny your equation produces a result that is incorrect by about 12%? > > And it's weird to me that there is the prime gap equation hanging out > there. Which means there are these people going about their lives > with this thing hanging over their heads. And it's curious that they > would do so, but hey, you do what you feel like you have to do... > > Real world is a nasty place. It's competitive, and it's not some > fictional story. People clash and fight over all kinds of things and > it can get REALLY nasty. To most of you none of that matters as > you're not important enough for it to matter. What you say on Usenet > is as worthless as what you do in your daily lives. You CAN say > anything. Few people, if any, actually care. > > But I'm one guy. I push math people just so far. And then I back > down. Which has been going on for years, as I know that when it gets > too nasty then people can get physical. So there is a three year > grace which could be extended. Years can go by, and I've noted I'm > getting comfortable with 2030 as I ponder this situation and see a > math community that is settled into error at such a depth that more > than likely, yes, things would get physically violent if I pushed too > hard. > You will pleased to know that any physical danger will now fall on me. > That the human species will allow itself to be paused for that long > could be about destiny. > > Truth can be too expensive you see. And at the end of the day, > ignorance is the natural human condition for most. And it doesn't > seem to keep them from doing the most important thing they do: > reproduce. > > As long as people keep making babies, it doesn't matter much if their > math is wrong. > > James Harris
From: MichaelW on 23 Jul 2010 00:01 On Jul 23, 1:33 pm, JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > It is my choice. > Only if you actually have an example of your equation producing the correct result, which you don't. Since you don't you choice is an illusion.
From: Owen Jacobson on 23 Jul 2010 00:10 On 2010-07-22 23:33:14 -0400, JSH said: > Your pathetic taunts mean nothing to me. I am the one who can move an > entire world. Put up or shut up. -o
From: JSH on 23 Jul 2010 00:35
On Jul 22, 9:10 pm, Owen Jacobson <angrybald...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 2010-07-22 23:33:14 -0400, JSH said: > > > Your pathetic taunts mean nothing to me. I am the one who can move an > > entire world. > > Put up or shut up. > > -o Childish morons. It's not kid's games here. I'm allowing mathematicians millions of dollars in grant money. Millions. You think you have that kind of juice? To shift the world with a simple post? You dumbasses are deluded. Your posts mean nothing. Mine do. James Harris |