From: Mark Murray on 29 Nov 2009 19:41 JSH wrote: > Well, pity me for daring to acknowledge error! You? Challenge error? HAH! http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/a2417f4c0d92865f/462c4f5a3329caf7?pli=1 JSH: "There is no point looking for errors there since there aren't any" (paraphrased). > And people wonder why it's so hard to do it? I Just wonder why its so hard for you to generalise the experience. You finally admitted that your TSP solution was an abject failure (never mind the "fact" that it was a proof). Now keep going. > Because nasty people will insult you for doing it, that's why. What about your own insults (the ones you haven't dealt with yet, even though your victims have been long vindicated). > These people simply hate. Making yourself vulnerable by acknowledging > error is an invitation to them to kick you while you are down. They > are dismal humans. Look in the mirror. >> this your 50th (or is it the 500th) unsuccessful attempt, one might be >> tempted to side with dear Uncle Al, who so poetically put it to you in > > You mean the robot? What makes you think his behavior is not > predictable? "The Robot" was right. You were wrong. Deal with it. > I've read it before. And you will do so again. And again &c, until you learn. M
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: Galois group of a quintic polynomial over Q Next: Help with a (hopefully famous) quote |