JSH: Understanding prime gaps issue
in [Math]
|
Prev: statistical test question
Next: setting up a Math Induction template Re: Proof of the Infinitude of Perfect Numbers and infinitude of Mersenne primes #673 Correcting Math
From: Tim Little on 16 Jul 2010 04:21 On 2010-07-15, Jesse F. Hughes <jesse(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote: > Anyway, let's see how it goes. As far as I can see, no one has used the > phrase "natural numbers non-coalgebraic axiom" before this post. Wow, it has *EXPLODED* in Google search rankings. Your brilliant new idea now occupies the top two positions for "non-coalgebraic axiom" out of "About 112,000,000 results"! BOTH of the top two out of more than 112 MILLION pages! You are a genius! - Tim
From: Tim Little on 16 Jul 2010 04:24 On 2010-07-15, JSH <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote: > So you're not using Google? I do that search and my math blog comes > up #6. I am using Google. Were you not aware that Google directs queries from IP addresses based in different geographical areas to different servers with different settings, and frequently gives different search results? It also gives different results based on whether you are logged in to a Google account, as well of dozens of other known variables and probably millions of unknown variables. - Tim
From: Jesse F. Hughes on 16 Jul 2010 09:17 Tim Little <tim(a)little-possums.net> writes: > On 2010-07-15, Jesse F. Hughes <jesse(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote: >> Anyway, let's see how it goes. As far as I can see, no one has used the >> phrase "natural numbers non-coalgebraic axiom" before this post. > > Wow, it has *EXPLODED* in Google search rankings. Your brilliant new > idea now occupies the top two positions for "non-coalgebraic axiom" > out of "About 112,000,000 results"! BOTH of the top two out of more > than 112 MILLION pages! > > You are a genius! Obviously, I'm not as successful as JSH. The third hit (http://www.graveyardofthegods.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=10053) is a reference to my axiom by some third party. This means that my work is not as deep as JSH's, since importance is inversely proportional to number of people discussing it. If my axiom were *really* good, it would be suppressed. -- Jesse F. Hughes "I think the problem for some of you is that you think you are very smart. I AM very smart. I am smarter on a scale you cannot really comprehend and there is the problem." -- James S. Harris
From: Mark Murray on 17 Jul 2010 04:32 On 17/07/2010 01:14, MichaelW wrote: > Having typed all of this I have had some interest in the wiki but only > a two votes on the poll thread so I am considering the idea stillborn > at this point. You are counting my vote right? 1) Wiki 2) Blog(spot) M -- Mark "No Nickname" Murray Notable nebbish, extreme generalist.
From: Aatu Koskensilta on 17 Jul 2010 09:05
Mark Murray <w.h.oami(a)example.com> writes: > Axioms are definitions. How is e.g. For every two sets A and B there is a set having exactly A and B as elements. a definition? What does it define? -- Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta(a)uta.fi) "Wovon man nicht sprechan kann, dar�ber muss man schweigen" - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus |