Java 64-bit for IEx64 is here!
in [64 Bits Windows]
|
From: Carlos on 5 Feb 2009 11:12 Long live the character based interface! Let's go back to pure 80x25 and get rid of all the nonesense. :) Carlos "Bobby Johnson" wrote: > I have to agree with Steve 100%. The only thing these > plugins and addons do is bog down the whole internet. Lets > go back to the days when there were none of this garbage. > And don't forget popups and all this trash advertising, > cookies to track your use, and a multitude of other > bandwidth hogs no one requested - at least I didn't! > > > Steve Foster [SBS MVP] wrote: > > Bogey Man wrote: > > > >> <miso(a)sushi.com> wrote in message > >> news:85b49398-0390-4bd8-9142-9fcb9bb4e264(a)r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com... > >>> On Feb 2, 3:34 pm, Carlos <Car...(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > >>>> Praised be the Lord! > >>>> :) > >>>> We have a final release of Java compatible with IE > >>>> 64-bithttps://cds.sun.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/CDS-CDS_Developer-S... > >>>> > >>>> A mere 16 megs download. > >>>> Fire up your IE64 and test it > >>>> here:http://www.upshot.com/login/javatest/logo/javavmtest.html > >>>> If you can see the spinning triangle, welcome to the world of 64-bit > >>>> IE. > >>>> Carlos > >>> > >>> Can you speak to the folks at Adobe about Flash? ;-) > >> > >> I sure hope that Adobe gets its act together and get a 64bit version > >> of Flash out. They are sure taking their sweet bloody time with it. It > >> makes me wonder how they are with their other products that have to be > >> paid for. > > > > Where I have to use IE, I prefer to use 64-bit IE (over 32-bit IE) > > precisely because neither Java nor Flash worked... > > > > I've yet to see a website where the use of Flash actually helped. > > >
From: Mark H on 5 Feb 2009 12:51 Unfortunately, there are more folk who prefer flashy buttons with no purpose, than geeks who simply need functionality. "Carlos" <Carlos(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:9366F68D-FD1B-494B-81AD-8E2340404D9C(a)microsoft.com... > Long live the character based interface! > Let's go back to pure 80x25 and get rid of all the nonesense. > :) > Carlos > > "Bobby Johnson" wrote: > > > I have to agree with Steve 100%. The only thing these > > plugins and addons do is bog down the whole internet. Lets > > go back to the days when there were none of this garbage. > > And don't forget popups and all this trash advertising, > > cookies to track your use, and a multitude of other > > bandwidth hogs no one requested - at least I didn't! > > > > > > Steve Foster [SBS MVP] wrote: > > > Bogey Man wrote: > > > > > >> <miso(a)sushi.com> wrote in message > > >> news:85b49398-0390-4bd8-9142-9fcb9bb4e264(a)r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com... > > >>> On Feb 2, 3:34 pm, Carlos <Car...(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > > >>>> Praised be the Lord! > > >>>> :) > > >>>> We have a final release of Java compatible with IE > > >>>> 64-bithttps://cds.sun.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/CDS-CDS_Developer-S. ... > > >>>> > > >>>> A mere 16 megs download. > > >>>> Fire up your IE64 and test it > > >>>> here:http://www.upshot.com/login/javatest/logo/javavmtest.html > > >>>> If you can see the spinning triangle, welcome to the world of 64-bit > > >>>> IE. > > >>>> Carlos > > >>> > > >>> Can you speak to the folks at Adobe about Flash? ;-) > > >> > > >> I sure hope that Adobe gets its act together and get a 64bit version > > >> of Flash out. They are sure taking their sweet bloody time with it. It > > >> makes me wonder how they are with their other products that have to be > > >> paid for. > > > > > > Where I have to use IE, I prefer to use 64-bit IE (over 32-bit IE) > > > precisely because neither Java nor Flash worked... > > > > > > I've yet to see a website where the use of Flash actually helped. > > > > >
From: Bartok on 5 Feb 2009 14:13 Heh... i'd like to go back to DOS ... I just got good at tweaking it and 'poof' .. nobody is using it. "Mark H" <jmhonzell(a)nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message news:eVgkvp7hJHA.1172(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > Unfortunately, there are more folk who prefer flashy buttons with no > purpose, than geeks who simply need functionality. > > > "Carlos" <Carlos(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:9366F68D-FD1B-494B-81AD-8E2340404D9C(a)microsoft.com... >> Long live the character based interface! >> Let's go back to pure 80x25 and get rid of all the nonesense. >> :) >> Carlos >> >> "Bobby Johnson" wrote: >> >> > I have to agree with Steve 100%. The only thing these >> > plugins and addons do is bog down the whole internet. Lets >> > go back to the days when there were none of this garbage. >> > And don't forget popups and all this trash advertising, >> > cookies to track your use, and a multitude of other >> > bandwidth hogs no one requested - at least I didn't! >> > >> > >> > Steve Foster [SBS MVP] wrote: >> > > Bogey Man wrote: >> > > >> > >> <miso(a)sushi.com> wrote in message >> > >> > news:85b49398-0390-4bd8-9142-9fcb9bb4e264(a)r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com... >> > >>> On Feb 2, 3:34 pm, Carlos <Car...(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >> > >>>> Praised be the Lord! >> > >>>> :) >> > >>>> We have a final release of Java compatible with IE >> > >>>> > 64-bithttps://cds.sun.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/CDS-CDS_Developer-S. > .. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> A mere 16 megs download. >> > >>>> Fire up your IE64 and test it >> > >>>> here:http://www.upshot.com/login/javatest/logo/javavmtest.html >> > >>>> If you can see the spinning triangle, welcome to the world of > 64-bit >> > >>>> IE. >> > >>>> Carlos >> > >>> >> > >>> Can you speak to the folks at Adobe about Flash? ;-) >> > >> >> > >> I sure hope that Adobe gets its act together and get a 64bit version >> > >> of Flash out. They are sure taking their sweet bloody time with it. > It >> > >> makes me wonder how they are with their other products that have to > be >> > >> paid for. >> > > >> > > Where I have to use IE, I prefer to use 64-bit IE (over 32-bit IE) >> > > precisely because neither Java nor Flash worked... >> > > >> > > I've yet to see a website where the use of Flash actually helped. >> > > >> > > >
From: miso on 6 Feb 2009 18:51 On Feb 5, 11:13 am, "Bartok" <Bar...(a)taskforceable.com> wrote: > Heh... i'd like to go back to DOS ... I just got good at tweaking it and > 'poof' .. nobody is using it. > > "Mark H" <jmhonz...(a)nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message > > news:eVgkvp7hJHA.1172(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > > Unfortunately, there are more folk who prefer flashy buttons with no > > purpose, than geeks who simply need functionality. > > > "Carlos" <Car...(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >news:9366F68D-FD1B-494B-81AD-8E2340404D9C(a)microsoft.com... > >> Long live the character based interface! > >> Let's go back to pure 80x25 and get rid of all the nonesense. > >> :) > >> Carlos > > >> "Bobby Johnson" wrote: > > >> > I have to agree with Steve 100%. The only thing these > >> > plugins and addons do is bog down the whole internet. Lets > >> > go back to the days when there were none of this garbage. > >> > And don't forget popups and all this trash advertising, > >> > cookies to track your use, and a multitude of other > >> > bandwidth hogs no one requested - at least I didn't! > > >> > Steve Foster [SBS MVP] wrote: > >> > > Bogey Man wrote: > > >> > >> <m...(a)sushi.com> wrote in message > > >news:85b49398-0390-4bd8-9142-9fcb9bb4e264(a)r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com.... > >> > >>> On Feb 2, 3:34 pm, Carlos <Car...(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > >> > >>>> Praised be the Lord! > >> > >>>> :) > >> > >>>> We have a final release of Java compatible with IE > > > 64-bithttps://cds.sun.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/CDS-CDS_Developer-S. > > .. > > >> > >>>> A mere 16 megs download. > >> > >>>> Fire up your IE64 and test it > >> > >>>> here:http://www.upshot.com/login/javatest/logo/javavmtest.html > >> > >>>> If you can see the spinning triangle, welcome to the world of > > 64-bit > >> > >>>> IE. > >> > >>>> Carlos > > >> > >>> Can you speak to the folks at Adobe about Flash? ;-) > > >> > >> I sure hope that Adobe gets its act together and get a 64bit version > >> > >> of Flash out. They are sure taking their sweet bloody time with it. > > It > >> > >> makes me wonder how they are with their other products that have to > > be > >> > >> paid for. > > >> > > Where I have to use IE, I prefer to use 64-bit IE (over 32-bit IE) > >> > > precisely because neither Java nor Flash worked... > > >> > > I've yet to see a website where the use of Flash actually helped. I run OpenDOS for one app. http://www.freedos.org/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDOS
From: Chucky Chease on 8 Feb 2009 16:13 Thanks for letting us know. Now, if I could get Flash to work in 64bit, I'd have it made "Carlos" <Carlos(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:5E3F8A67-51AE-4D66-BA0A-E0505B139156(a)microsoft.com... > Praised be the Lord! > :) > We have a final release of Java compatible with IE 64-bit > https://cds.sun.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/CDS-CDS_Developer-Site/en_US/-/USD/ViewProductDetail-Start?ProductRef=jre-6u12-oth-JPR(a)CDS-CDS_Developer > A mere 16 megs download. > Fire up your IE64 and test it here: > http://www.upshot.com/login/javatest/logo/javavmtest.html > If you can see the spinning triangle, welcome to the world of 64-bit IE. > Carlos
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Multimedia software on WinXP Pro 64-bit edition? Next: ActiveX Porting Issues |