Prev: FAQ Topic - Why does 1+1 equal 11? or How do I convert a string to a number? (2010-05-30)
Next: ANNC: qooxlisp 0.1: Driving Miss qooxdoo (from Common Lisp)
From: Joe Nine on 30 May 2010 06:04 VK wrote: > From my side I do reserve my rights to: > 1) to send to hell any attempts to enforce the "right" term ECMAScript > instead of "wrong" term JavaScript. You'll be busy countering Thomas pointedears daily claims that there is no javascript :)
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn on 30 May 2010 08:32 Joe Nine wrote: > VK wrote: >> From my side I do reserve my rights to: >> 1) to send to hell any attempts to enforce the "right" term ECMAScript >> instead of "wrong" term JavaScript. > > You'll be busy countering Thomas pointedears daily claims that there is > no javascript :) "javascript" !== "JavaScript" HTH & HAND PointedEars -- Anyone who slaps a 'this page is best viewed with Browser X' label on a Web page appears to be yearning for the bad old days, before the Web, when you had very little chance of reading a document written on another computer, another word processor, or another network. -- Tim Berners-Lee
From: Stefan Weiss on 30 May 2010 08:49 On 30/05/10 10:15, VK wrote: > So the medieval Ius primae noctis goes into use: if you cannot > eliminate your enemies then try to absorb them so soon they will be > just a part of yours. That's an interesting interpretation of the ius primae noctis. -- stefan
From: RobG on 30 May 2010 09:29 On May 30, 10:32 pm, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedE...(a)web.de> wrote: > Joe Nine wrote: > > VK wrote: > >> From my side I do reserve my rights to: > >> 1) to send to hell any attempts to enforce the "right" term ECMAScript > >> instead of "wrong" term JavaScript. > > > You'll be busy countering Thomas pointedears daily claims that there is > > no javascript :) > > "javascript" !== "JavaScript" In the realm of trademarks, I think you'll find that the two are identical. Capitalisation is irrelevant. -- Rob
From: VK on 30 May 2010 09:41
On May 30, 4:32 pm, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedE...(a)web.de> wrote: > "javascript" !== "JavaScript" Possibly is in some countries. I am not a trademark adviser, I am (now) a trends calculator. Whatever I know is coming from our time- share copyright specialists. As much as the US law is concerned: 'javascript' == 'JavaScript' == 'JAVASCRIPT'; |