From: MassiveProng on 16 Feb 2007 19:10 On Fri, 16 Feb 07 12:25:03 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >Of course it does. However, no Unix is "PC-user friendly". That depends on the user, dipshit. > I'm >trying to work on this problem but I've been getting side-tracked. Bwuahahahahaha... the problem is all yours.
From: MassiveProng on 16 Feb 2007 19:14 On Fri, 16 Feb 07 12:25:03 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >> Right now I also have LTSpice running on another >>desktop. I'm typing this while if figures. > >My point is that you should not have to have another computer _system_ >to do any other task. He said on another desktop. If you had any modern brains, you would know that that IS the SAME computer, that has multiple "desktops". A feature of Linux GUIs. Th glaring error I see is that LTSpice doesn't take long enough to run that it needs to do it in the background on another desktop. By the time he switched to a clean desktop, and back, it should be done. PCB layout routings (autoroute) DOES take a long time. A ray tracer takes a long time, but a SPICE simulation? Jeez.
From: MassiveProng on 16 Feb 2007 19:15 On Fri, 16 Feb 07 12:25:03 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > It is possible to have all tasks done for >you on that one system without any of them interfering with the other. No!... REALLY!??? Jeez, girl. You are years behind the rest of us. That is such OLD knowledge that it has almost been retired as long as you have. With you, it shows, however.
From: MassiveProng on 16 Feb 2007 19:19 On Fri, 16 Feb 07 12:36:30 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >Hardware is not my area of expertise. We couldn't tell... NOT! Bwuahahahahahaha! Neither is software. We can tell.
From: MassiveProng on 16 Feb 2007 19:20
On Fri, 16 Feb 07 12:36:30 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > However, >the fad was distributed processing at the time and that was one >way to distribute it. Was? Years behind, you are. |