From: jmfbahciv on
In article <87hcs4b3ba.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org>,
Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>"MooseFET" <kensmith(a)rahul.net> writes:
>> On Mar 28, 11:21 am, Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demun...(a)yahoo.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>> [.....]
>> > Back in January she was unable to read posts longer than about
>> > 100 lines.
>> [.....]
>> > The only reasonable conclusion is that, as always it seems,
>> > BAH was spewing lies.
>>
>> She may not know.
>>
>> Given that she operates largely on superstitions on such subjects,
>> this theory also fits the facts.
>
>Ah - she's fixed her cooker's dodgy connection now,
>and her newsreader now works. Makes perfect BAHsense!

No. Your facts are wrong. Reexamine your assumptions.

/BAH
From: T Wake on

<jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:euir71$8ss_002(a)s976.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
> In article <87hcs4b3ba.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org>,
> Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

>>
>>Ah - she's fixed her cooker's dodgy connection now,
>>and her newsreader now works. Makes perfect BAHsense!
>
> No. Your facts are wrong. Reexamine your assumptions.

How ironic.