From: jmfbahciv on 30 Mar 2007 07:10 In article <87hcs4b3ba.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org>, Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >"MooseFET" <kensmith(a)rahul.net> writes: >> On Mar 28, 11:21 am, Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demun...(a)yahoo.co.uk> >> wrote: >> [.....] >> > Back in January she was unable to read posts longer than about >> > 100 lines. >> [.....] >> > The only reasonable conclusion is that, as always it seems, >> > BAH was spewing lies. >> >> She may not know. >> >> Given that she operates largely on superstitions on such subjects, >> this theory also fits the facts. > >Ah - she's fixed her cooker's dodgy connection now, >and her newsreader now works. Makes perfect BAHsense! No. Your facts are wrong. Reexamine your assumptions. /BAH
From: T Wake on 30 Mar 2007 13:06
<jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:euir71$8ss_002(a)s976.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <87hcs4b3ba.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org>, > Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> >>Ah - she's fixed her cooker's dodgy connection now, >>and her newsreader now works. Makes perfect BAHsense! > > No. Your facts are wrong. Reexamine your assumptions. How ironic. |