Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: MassiveProng on 15 Mar 2007 20:15 On 16 Mar 2007 01:12:46 +0200, Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> Gave us: >krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> writes: >> In article <874pomikjk.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org>, >> thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk says... >> > krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> writes: >> > > In article <3j0hv21dmsbm446in4auk2106k1m71rvqk(a)4ax.com>, >> > > MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org says... >> > > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:12:12 -0400, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> Gave us: >> > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > >Don't want no steenkin' Apples, now that they're x86. (Disclosure: I >> > > > >worked on the later G4 and G5 processors ;-) >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > That would be "worked with" Not "on", dipshit. >> > > >> > > MassivelyWrong once again, Dimbulb. I was a member of the Apple CPU >> > > development team (Nintendo PPC750 processor variants as well) until >> > > Apple switched to x86. >> > >> > Hmmm, why were Apple buying G4s from us at Freescale if they >> > made their own? >> >> Apple made none, idiot. > >Why were apply buying G4s from us at Freescale if they designed >their own? > >If you have more than 1/4 of a brain you might be able to predict >that I will probably narrow down the work you did "on" the G4 to >be "filled in forms and bought them from Freescale". > >Phil His version of "custom" is having carried them across a carpeted room in hand, in a 10% RH environment, wearing polyester clothing.
From: nonsense on 15 Mar 2007 23:43 Phil Carmody wrote: > krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> writes: > >>In article <874pomikjk.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org>, >>thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk says... >> >>>krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> writes: >>> >>>>In article <3j0hv21dmsbm446in4auk2106k1m71rvqk(a)4ax.com>, >>>>MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org says... >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:12:12 -0400, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> Gave us: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Don't want no steenkin' Apples, now that they're x86. (Disclosure: I >>>>>>worked on the later G4 and G5 processors ;-) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That would be "worked with" Not "on", dipshit. >>>> >>>>MassivelyWrong once again, Dimbulb. I was a member of the Apple CPU >>>>development team (Nintendo PPC750 processor variants as well) until >>>>Apple switched to x86. >>> >>>Hmmm, why were Apple buying G4s from us at Freescale if they >>>made their own? >> >>Apple made none, idiot. > > > Why were apply buying G4s from us at Freescale if they designed > their own? > > If you have more than 1/4 of a brain you might be able to predict > that I will probably narrow down the work you did "on" the G4 to > be "filled in forms and bought them from Freescale". People with real lives don't have time for that sort of nonsense, but we can easily understand why you do.
From: nonsense on 15 Mar 2007 23:45 krw wrote: > In article <vpijv2tpmnucjtvlaikpnda7fbsnu79tsm(a)4ax.com>, > MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org says... > >>On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:04:44 -0400, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> Gave us: >> >> >>>MassivelyWrong once again, Dimbulb. I was a member of the Apple CPU >>>development team (Nintendo PPC750 processor variants as well) until >>>Apple switched to x86. >> >> >> Neither of which is the G4 or G5. > > > G5 is the PPC970 (and 970MP), designed specifically for Apple, > Dimmie. I never said any different. The PPC750 was designed for > Apple (aka the G3) and modified specifically for Nintendo (then back > to Apple). > > G4 was a tupo (should have been G3), though we did work on the G4 for > a short time. > > >>Try again, lying asswipe. > > > No lies, Dimbulb. I leave the lies for you. You need something to > boost your ego. s/something/an awful lot/ >> Good to know that ther root of your stupidity is the fact that you >>are a MacTard too. I knew there was something stupid about your from >>the start, and that is a great part of it. > > > Dumb Dimmie, I've never so much as logged into a Mac so you're once > again MassivelyWrong. You couldn't get more wrong if you really, > really, really. tried. ...and you really, really, really are trying. >
From: nonsense on 15 Mar 2007 23:46 krw wrote: > In article <87ps7agky9.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org>, > thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk says... > >>krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> writes: >> >>>In article <874pomikjk.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org>, >>>thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk says... >>> >>>>krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> writes: >>>> >>>>>In article <3j0hv21dmsbm446in4auk2106k1m71rvqk(a)4ax.com>, >>>>>MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org says... >>>>> >>>>>>On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:12:12 -0400, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> Gave us: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>Don't want no steenkin' Apples, now that they're x86. (Disclosure: I >>>>>>>worked on the later G4 and G5 processors ;-) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> That would be "worked with" Not "on", dipshit. >>>>> >>>>>MassivelyWrong once again, Dimbulb. I was a member of the Apple CPU >>>>>development team (Nintendo PPC750 processor variants as well) until >>>>>Apple switched to x86. >>>> >>>>Hmmm, why were Apple buying G4s from us at Freescale if they >>>>made their own? >>> >>>Apple made none, idiot. >> >>Why were apply buying G4s from us at Freescale if they designed >>their own? > > > Try reading, idiot. > >>If you have more than 1/4 of a brain you might be able to predict >>that I will probably narrow down the work you did "on" the G4 to >>be "filled in forms and bought them from Freescale". > > > No, if you had *THAT* much brain, you would have figured out that I > would have pegged you for an idiot, like Dimmie. No go, all ego.
From: Ken Smith on 15 Mar 2007 22:55
In article <878xdyikn8.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org>, Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) writes: >> >I decided not to chip in and tell her about the IOCCC entry from >> >a few years back which implemented exactly the scheme you're >> >talking about - I thought that would prompt even more confusion >> >from the senile one. >> >> Did they go with the two copies of the checksum or the "please ignore >> this". > >The please ignore this method. See for yourself ;-) It's omoikane from >http://www.ioccc.org/2004/ I can see problems with porting this code. It uses a 32 bit constant but doesn't force the size of the variable it is used with. This is not a good idea in any program. It is doubly bad in one like this where the result needs to be 100% trustworthy. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge |