Jitter generation compare to dithering
in [DSP]
|
From: Randy Yates on 9 Nov 2009 16:57 Eric Jacobsen <eric.jacobsen(a)ieee.org> writes: > On 11/8/2009 5:53 PM, Randy Yates wrote: >> Eric Jacobsen<eric.jacobsen(a)ieee.org> writes: >>> [...] >>> This place is going to get really tiresome if every response to a >>> question has to include every possible nuance in the answer. >> >> To make a statement that is not true in general but only in certain >> special cases and not point out that it's only true in those special >> cases is not a "nuance," in my opinion. > > I don't think I did that. Perhaps you did, but it likely doesn't matter. If it doesn't matter, then let's say you did. -- Randy Yates % "Though you ride on the wheels of tomorrow, Digital Signal Labs % you still wander the fields of your mailto://yates(a)ieee.org % sorrow." http://www.digitalsignallabs.com % '21st Century Man', *Time*, ELO
From: Eric Jacobsen on 9 Nov 2009 18:03
On 11/9/2009 2:57 PM, Randy Yates wrote: > Eric Jacobsen<eric.jacobsen(a)ieee.org> writes: > >> On 11/8/2009 5:53 PM, Randy Yates wrote: >>> Eric Jacobsen<eric.jacobsen(a)ieee.org> writes: >>>> [...] >>>> This place is going to get really tiresome if every response to a >>>> question has to include every possible nuance in the answer. >>> To make a statement that is not true in general but only in certain >>> special cases and not point out that it's only true in those special >>> cases is not a "nuance," in my opinion. >> I don't think I did that. Perhaps you did, but it likely doesn't matter. > > If it doesn't matter, then let's say you did. lol ... okay. ;) -- Eric Jacobsen Minister of Algorithms Abineau Communications http://www.abineau.com |