Prev: No matching device was found. Driver will be installed when plugged in.
Next: about READ_PORT_ULONG
From: Norman Diamond on 25 Dec 2005 21:01
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/driver/wdf/wdf-arch.mspx
has a "Download" section containing words "wdf-arch.doc"
which are a link to
http://download.microsoft.com/download/5/D/6/5D6EAF2B-7DDF-476B-93DC-7CF0072878E6/wdf-arch.doc

http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/driver/wdf/KMDF-arch.mspx
has a "Download" section containing words "KMDF-arch.doc"
which are a link to
http://download.microsoft.com/download/5/D/6/5D6EAF2B-7DDF-476B-93DC-7CF0072878E6/wdf-arch.doc

Two different descriptions of the same download link, and two different
asserted sizes for the downloadable document.

A few weeks ago I e-mailed Microsoft, pointing out the above and asking if
the link in that second page should link to a KMDF document instead of the
WDF document. At least Microsoft didn't blame me and didn't say I should
read the instructions, so Microsoft has improved somewhat over the years.
But still... does anyone think that maybe the link in that second page
should link to a KMDF document? Should it be fixed?

From: Doron Holan [MS] on 26 Dec 2005 00:11
i sent this to the folks who maintain the website

thx for the feedback
d

--
Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. this alias is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.


"Norman Diamond" <ndiamond(a)community.nospam> wrote in message
news:eTRKCBcCGHA.628(a)TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/driver/wdf/wdf-arch.mspx
> has a "Download" section containing words "wdf-arch.doc"
> which are a link to
> http://download.microsoft.com/download/5/D/6/5D6EAF2B-7DDF-476B-93DC-7CF0072878E6/wdf-arch.doc
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/driver/wdf/KMDF-arch.mspx
> has a "Download" section containing words "KMDF-arch.doc"
> which are a link to
> http://download.microsoft.com/download/5/D/6/5D6EAF2B-7DDF-476B-93DC-7CF0072878E6/wdf-arch.doc
>
> Two different descriptions of the same download link, and two different
> asserted sizes for the downloadable document.
>
> A few weeks ago I e-mailed Microsoft, pointing out the above and asking if
> the link in that second page should link to a KMDF document instead of the
> WDF document. At least Microsoft didn't blame me and didn't say I should
> read the instructions, so Microsoft has improved somewhat over the years.
> But still... does anyone think that maybe the link in that second page
> should link to a KMDF document? Should it be fixed?


From: Norman Diamond on 26 Dec 2005 00:19
Thank you. I interpret that as partly a yes answer, so hopefully the
missing link will appear some day. Thank you.

"Doron Holan [MS]" <doronh(a)nospam.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:%231ezIrdCGHA.1028(a)TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>i sent this to the folks who maintain the website
>
> thx for the feedback
> d
>
> --
> Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. this alias is for
> newsgroup purposes only.
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
>
>
> "Norman Diamond" <ndiamond(a)community.nospam> wrote in message
> news:eTRKCBcCGHA.628(a)TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>> http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/driver/wdf/wdf-arch.mspx
>> has a "Download" section containing words "wdf-arch.doc"
>> which are a link to
>> http://download.microsoft.com/download/5/D/6/5D6EAF2B-7DDF-476B-93DC-7CF0072878E6/wdf-arch.doc
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/driver/wdf/KMDF-arch.mspx
>> has a "Download" section containing words "KMDF-arch.doc"
>> which are a link to
>> http://download.microsoft.com/download/5/D/6/5D6EAF2B-7DDF-476B-93DC-7CF0072878E6/wdf-arch.doc
>>
>> Two different descriptions of the same download link, and two different
>> asserted sizes for the downloadable document.
>>
>> A few weeks ago I e-mailed Microsoft, pointing out the above and asking
>> if the link in that second page should link to a KMDF document instead of
>> the WDF document. At least Microsoft didn't blame me and didn't say I
>> should read the instructions, so Microsoft has improved somewhat over the
>> years. But still... does anyone think that maybe the link in that second
>> page should link to a KMDF document? Should it be fixed?
>
>

From: Doron Holan [MS] on 29 Dec 2005 02:20
the folks who own the content on the website say that it has been fixed.
thx for reporting the issue.

d

--
Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. this alias is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.


"Norman Diamond" <ndiamond(a)community.nospam> wrote in message
news:eMZ0nvdCGHA.2920(a)tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Thank you. I interpret that as partly a yes answer, so hopefully the
> missing link will appear some day. Thank you.
>
> "Doron Holan [MS]" <doronh(a)nospam.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:%231ezIrdCGHA.1028(a)TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>>i sent this to the folks who maintain the website
>>
>> thx for the feedback
>> d
>>
>> --
>> Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. this alias is for
>> newsgroup purposes only.
>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
>> rights.
>>
>>
>> "Norman Diamond" <ndiamond(a)community.nospam> wrote in message
>> news:eTRKCBcCGHA.628(a)TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/driver/wdf/wdf-arch.mspx
>>> has a "Download" section containing words "wdf-arch.doc"
>>> which are a link to
>>> http://download.microsoft.com/download/5/D/6/5D6EAF2B-7DDF-476B-93DC-7CF0072878E6/wdf-arch.doc
>>>
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/driver/wdf/KMDF-arch.mspx
>>> has a "Download" section containing words "KMDF-arch.doc"
>>> which are a link to
>>> http://download.microsoft.com/download/5/D/6/5D6EAF2B-7DDF-476B-93DC-7CF0072878E6/wdf-arch.doc
>>>
>>> Two different descriptions of the same download link, and two different
>>> asserted sizes for the downloadable document.
>>>
>>> A few weeks ago I e-mailed Microsoft, pointing out the above and asking
>>> if the link in that second page should link to a KMDF document instead
>>> of the WDF document. At least Microsoft didn't blame me and didn't say
>>> I should read the instructions, so Microsoft has improved somewhat over
>>> the years. But still... does anyone think that maybe the link in that
>>> second page should link to a KMDF document? Should it be fixed?
>>
>>
>


 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: No matching device was found. Driver will be installed when plugged in.
Next: about READ_PORT_ULONG