Prev: Hitman Pro 3 3.5.6.106
Next: Anti-virus mechanisms
From: Bill on 23 Jul 2010 00:42 On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:20:43 +0000 (UTC), Steve Pope wrote: > Any advice? Thanks. I'm a different "Bill" than the fellow that responded earlier in this thread. During the installation of KAV 2010 (AV, not the "suite") on my machines, IIRC, KAV detected that I had Spybot S&D installed, and it reported the two would conflict; and to uninstall Spybot S&D before proceeding. This was ~ 5-6 months ago, and the details are pretty hazy. -- Email address is a Spam trap.
From: Steve Pope on 23 Jul 2010 02:05 Bill <2k7508(a)gmail.com> wrote: >During the installation of KAV 2010 (AV, not the "suite") on my >machines, IIRC, KAV detected that I had Spybot S&D installed, and it >reported the two would conflict; and to uninstall Spybot S&D before >proceeding. This was ~ 5-6 months ago, and the details are pretty hazy. Thanks. I have heard this will happen, but it did not happen to me. I did however turn off Spybot's real-time protection during the KAV 2010 install, and turned it back on afterwards. So far, no conflict. I've now proceeded to my second KAV 2010 install, on a lower-configuration netbook. For that one, I deleted Spybot and installed Malwarebytes instead on advice from a colleague. That one seems stable but it does bog down seriously during a KAV scan. Steve
From: Roy on 24 Jul 2010 16:17
On Jul 22, 4:50 am, spop...(a)speedymail.org (Steve Pope) wrote: > Roy <royba...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >As far as Kaspersky 2010 products are concerned whether its the AV or > >the KIS they have the peculiarity that if your PC had a RAM of just > >256mb, the scanning will take 100% of the CPU resources, the same > >thing I experienced with the latest AVGs that the PC seems to hang for > >quite a time. > >I tried increasing the RAM to 512mb and the scanning time takes about > >half of the CPU resources and seems to improve the situation meaning > >it has something to do with the RAM capacity. > >I had complained this peculiarity to the kaspersky forum and all the > >experts there suggested to the same direction that the latest version > >of kaspersky is best if the memory is higher than 256mb....... > >and in fact with a PC that has a RAM of 1 Gb the performance was a lot > >better.... > > Thanks. > > The machine I installed it on have 2 gigs of RAM; the other two > I hope to install it on each have one gig. > > Steve I think there are more issues that you need to consider and that needs more ideas ..... if you visit on kaspersky forum and register you can freely ask every question related to kaspesk products |