LHC Math gives a Doomsday.
in [Relativity]
|
From: PD on 31 Dec 2009 10:56 On Dec 30, 10:04 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 30, 6:34 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 29, 11:40 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > How do you know that a LHC salesman is lying? His lips are moving. > > > > They tell the blind Aunty-Als, relax sweety it's done before through > > > cosmic rays. > > > > Then further discretely away say NEVER before since the Big Bang. > > > > And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays which like LHC's > > > Alice generate kinetic Energy, LHC's Atlas will be converting it to > > > 100% potential energy. > > > What? No. Where did you read such nonsense? > > > > And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays, Alice will be > > > generating heat 100,000 times greater then the Sun's core. > > > So do cosmic rays, at the point of collision. > > > > And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays, cosmic rays > > > don't generate the Big Bang's quarks soup (quark-gluon plasma state) > > > where as Alice and Aunty-Al will. > > > Cosmic rays do the same thing. > > > > How many lies until Aunty-Al & others stop trusting LHC? > > False, LHC repeats how Earth's been bombarded by cosmic rays billions > of times, never specifying this is the very ***1st time*** at such > high concentration. What high concentration? At LHC, each of the collisions is distinct, and the products dissipate into the detector long before the next collision occurs. > Critical mass and sufficient solar mass produces > detonations. > > Anything less, simply fizzles away.
From: PD on 31 Dec 2009 10:56 On Dec 30, 10:26 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 30, 6:34 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 29, 11:40 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > How do you know that a LHC salesman is lying? His lips are moving. > > > > They tell the blind Aunty-Als, relax sweety it's done before through > > > cosmic rays. > > > > Then further discretely away say NEVER before since the Big Bang. > > > > And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays which like LHC's > > > Alice generate kinetic Energy, LHC's Atlas will be converting it to > > > 100% potential energy. > > > What? No. Where did you read such nonsense? > > You do even know the difference between Alice and Atlas experiments, > get educated. Yes, I do. Where did you read such nonsense? > > Oh and I know your answer, "Alice is a static collision". > > > > > > > > And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays, Alice will be > > > generating heat 100,000 times greater then the Sun's core. > > > So do cosmic rays, at the point of collision. > > > > And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays, cosmic rays > > > don't generate the Big Bang's quarks soup (quark-gluon plasma state) > > > where as Alice and Aunty-Al will. > > > Cosmic rays do the same thing. > > > > How many lies until Aunty-Al & others stop trusting LHC?
From: guskz on 1 Jan 2010 14:40 On Dec 31 2009, 10:56 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 30, 10:04 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 30, 6:34 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 29, 11:40 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > How do you know that a LHC salesman is lying? His lips are moving. > > > > > They tell the blind Aunty-Als, relax sweety it's done before through > > > > cosmic rays. > > > > > Then further discretely away say NEVER before since the Big Bang. > > > > > And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays which like LHC's > > > > Alice generate kinetic Energy, LHC's Atlas will be converting it to > > > > 100% potential energy. > > > > What? No. Where did you read such nonsense? > > > > > And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays, Alice will be > > > > generating heat 100,000 times greater then the Sun's core. > > > > So do cosmic rays, at the point of collision. > > > > > And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays, cosmic rays > > > > don't generate the Big Bang's quarks soup (quark-gluon plasma state) > > > > where as Alice and Aunty-Al will. > > > > Cosmic rays do the same thing. > > > > > How many lies until Aunty-Al & others stop trusting LHC? > > > False, LHC repeats how Earth's been bombarded by cosmic rays billions > > of times, never specifying this is the very ***1st time*** at such > > high concentration. > > What high concentration? Get educated, perhaps you'll know why LHC says never before since the big bang. Otherwise you'll want to correct them. > > > Critical mass and sufficient solar mass produces > > detonations. > > > Anything less, simply fizzles away. > >
From: guskz on 1 Jan 2010 14:48 On Dec 31 2009, 10:56 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 30, 10:26 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 30, 6:34 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 29, 11:40 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > How do you know that a LHC salesman is lying? His lips are moving. > > > > > They tell the blind Aunty-Als, relax sweety it's done before through > > > > cosmic rays. > > > > > Then further discretely away say NEVER before since the Big Bang. > > > > > And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays which like LHC's > > > > Alice generate kinetic Energy, LHC's Atlas will be converting it to > > > > 100% potential energy. > > > > What? No. Where did you read such nonsense? > > > You do even know the difference between Alice and Atlas experiments, > > get educated. > > Yes, I do. Where did you read such nonsense? > The only nonsense is your education. Get educated about the difference when total collision momentum = zero and when it is not. > > > > Oh and I know your answer, "Alice is a static collision". > > > > > And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays, Alice will be > > > > generating heat 100,000 times greater then the Sun's core. > > > > So do cosmic rays, at the point of collision. > > > > > And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays, cosmic rays > > > > don't generate the Big Bang's quarks soup (quark-gluon plasma state) > > > > where as Alice and Aunty-Al will. > > > > Cosmic rays do the same thing. > > > > > How many lies until Aunty-Al & others stop trusting LHC? > >
From: PD on 2 Jan 2010 13:22 On Jan 1, 1:40 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 31 2009, 10:56 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 30, 10:04 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 30, 6:34 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 29, 11:40 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > How do you know that a LHC salesman is lying? His lips are moving.. > > > > > > They tell the blind Aunty-Als, relax sweety it's done before through > > > > > cosmic rays. > > > > > > Then further discretely away say NEVER before since the Big Bang. > > > > > > And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays which like LHC's > > > > > Alice generate kinetic Energy, LHC's Atlas will be converting it to > > > > > 100% potential energy. > > > > > What? No. Where did you read such nonsense? > > > > > > And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays, Alice will be > > > > > generating heat 100,000 times greater then the Sun's core. > > > > > So do cosmic rays, at the point of collision. > > > > > > And even further discretely, no not like cosmic rays, cosmic rays > > > > > don't generate the Big Bang's quarks soup (quark-gluon plasma state) > > > > > where as Alice and Aunty-Al will. > > > > > Cosmic rays do the same thing. > > > > > > How many lies until Aunty-Al & others stop trusting LHC? > > > > False, LHC repeats how Earth's been bombarded by cosmic rays billions > > > of times, never specifying this is the very ***1st time*** at such > > > high concentration. > > > What high concentration? > > Get educated, perhaps you'll know why LHC says never before since the > big bang. > > Otherwise you'll want to correct them. You mean correct their little press blurbs designed to excite the lay public? Is this what you're worried about? > > > > > > Critical mass and sufficient solar mass produces > > > detonations. > > > > Anything less, simply fizzles away. > >
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: A simple Q. but not a simple A,, Next: LHC marries Aunt-Al |