LHC's Black Hole due to charge
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Chapt19; Superdeterminism #224 Atom Totality theory
Next: Quantum Gravity 350.8: P(A-->B) = P(B-->A) and P(A<-->B) = 0 Occurs iff P(A-->B) = 1/2 Re-Examined in view of 350.7
From: Lee on 28 Dec 2009 09:07 On Dec 28, 2:44 pm, 7 <website_has_em...(a)www.enemygadgets.com> wrote: .... > One collision of a 10^20 eV particle creates a massive shower of particles. you sounds mental "a particle creates particles, a massive shower" indeed, tell more
From: Sam Wormley on 28 Dec 2009 11:24 WILL THE LHC DESTROY EARTH? http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/vstenger/Briefs/LHC.pdf
From: guskz on 28 Dec 2009 12:39
On Dec 28, 7:38 am, 7 <website_has_em...(a)www.enemygadgets.com> wrote: > gu...(a)hotmail.com wrote: > > The previous equation dealt with the proton and it's mass, this > > doesn't seem to matter.... > > > .....since even LHC uses the charge of proton (which is much bigger) > > to determine the 7 TeV generated from the collision. > > > In the same way they say a Black Hole can feed from the CMBR (cosmic- > > microwave-background-radiation) in space , likewise a tiny black hole > > can feed from both the force of charge and magnets in the LHC > > experiment. > > > If so the End of Earth would still be imminent. > > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_radiation > > 1TeV = 10^12 eV > > Cosmic radiation energies = 10^20 eV > idiot, I already said cosmic rays are surrounded by neutral charge where as the beams are not. > > This situation is not the same with cosmic rays since they collide > > with hydrogen atoms where the charge is mostly neutral (and/or far > > apart) due to hydrogen's electrons. > > > -------------------------- > > Outside this topic, since they say the "thermal radiation" of the CMBR > > can feed a black hole (absorbs more radiation than it emits), then why > > don't cosmic rays colliding with the sun's gas particles generate tiny > > black holes that then feed off of the sun's huge thermal radiation? > > |