LOGICAL PECULIARITIES OF LIFE AFTER DEATH
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Fast Lorentz transforms: was Why is the square of the universal speed limit the amount of energy?
Next: -*MARK*- meet George Re: LOGICAL PECULIARITIES OF LIFE AFTER DEATH
From: George Hammond on 2 May 2010 17:01 LOGICAL PECULIARITIES OF LIFE AFTER DEATH Copyright George Hammond 2010 Note: "LAD" = "Life After Death" Note: Please point out any logical inconsistencies It occurs to me that there must be certain structural rules as to what can or cannot occur in life after death (LAD). If we assume that LAD is basically a revisitation of Earthly life, then the first thing we deduce is that it cannot be possible for you to return to Earth at a date later your date of death. The reason for this is simple; it would be possible for you to meet someone who had attended your funeral or read your obituary and knew that you were already dead. This would present an illogical paradox which cannot be allowed in our scientific view of LAD. So the first structural rule must be that you can never observe a calendar day which postdates the date of your death. Likewise, you apparently cannot meet people who are already dead in Heaven at a date later than the date of their death either, because other people still alive would likewise notice them also! This it would appear is not a great problem. In the first place we expect that LAD will largely be a biographical life review, in other words most of it will take place in the past. Visions from your childhood your adolescence, middle-age etc. etc. etc. All of this occurred long before your death. So I assume in the first place that it is not true that the only people you see in Heaven are people who are already dead- in fact just the opposite is true... you only see dead people by returning to an earlier date when both you and they, were both alive! Most of the people you see in Heaven will probably still be alive on Earth, however, you will not see them after the date of your death. Now arises the question of Beatification. One assumes that the first principle or essential-reason for life after death is the Beatification of the body and obtaining the Beatific Vision. So the question is; will you be walking around in the world with a Beatified body and looking like God himself? Obviously this would present a problem, indeed you would obviously start a riot if you ever appeared in public in such a form. Okay then, I presume then that the Beatification must be mental rather than physical at least during the period of life review. In other words you will revisit old situations and old scenes but you will see them with "new eyes" and perhaps with a new body sensorially speaking but not a new body appearance wise. In other words you will be transformed or beatified psychologically and spiritually but your appearance will not change. This of course is getting complicated and it appears to be the beginning of complications for the theory. For instance if you revisit an old scene and with your newfound powers act differently, this would alter the entire history of your life.... so what would become of the rest of the life review? We simply can't believe that you live life all over again in a completely altered form and totally new course of events. That is simply too complicated. No, if there is LAD, I think you must simply revisit the old scenes but see them with new eyes... and this ever-increasing Beatific perception of your past life builds finally to a level of complete Beatific Vision at the end of your life history. In other words you revisit your entire past life with an "invisible" transformed spirit but wearing your old body appearancewise in the various scenarios. Apparently, you don't do anything differently that would alter the recorded biography of your life. On the other hand there may be additional scenarios that are not part of a conventional biographical life review in which you may take different actions and do or accomplish additional things without logically upsetting your world history. Naturally if you have a Beatified body you would certainly want to run and jump and water-ski and drive a sports car at 150 miles an hour and experience all the pleasures of a perfect body. There is certainly no reason why you couldn't do this without altering the course of world history or your own recorded biography. Consider for a moment how complex an ordinary nocturnal dream is, and yet while you're experiencing the dream nothing seems logically impossible. We must assume that the same power is at work in LAD if it exists. Meanwhile I am still trying to develop an overall opinion as to the probability of the existence of LAD. In the first place, I now believe if it exists that it is, or must be, a revisit with full bodily senses of our everyday worldly environment.... but of course this environment is actually what we call a "virtual reality".... even though it looks exactly like the Earth we just left! If this is true, what it means is that we must have a DOUBLE BODY! The neuronal system of the brain is the first body and the microtubule system of the brain constitutes a SECOND BODY! Hence if we have two bodies we experience two lives before we finally expire permanently. In the Microtubule-Body we achieve the Beatific vision which by definition is a condition of "eternal life" because it has ZERO TIME DILATION . So the previous paragraph brings us around to the question of the scientific explanation of the SOUL . The microtubule system in the brain must in fact be the physical embodiment of the SOUL ! So it turns out the Greeks were correct, the Soul is IMMORTAL, and now we know WHY! George Hammond, M.S. Physics Reference: The Scientific Proof of God: http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/Hammond5s1.html ======================================== GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE Primary site http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond Mirror site http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 =======================================
From: raven1 on 2 May 2010 17:31 On Sun, 02 May 2010 17:14:23 -0400, George Hammond <Nowhere1(a)notspam.com> wrote: >Note: Please point out any logical inconsistencies For a start, you're assuming your conclusion that there's life after death in the first place.
From: madge on 2 May 2010 17:42 On Sun, 02 May 2010 22:31:01 +0100, raven1 <quoththeraven(a)nevermore.com> wrote: > On Sun, 02 May 2010 17:14:23 -0400, George Hammond > <Nowhere1(a)notspam.com> wrote: > >> Note: Please point out any logical inconsistencies > > For a start, you're assuming your conclusion that there's life after > death in the first place. May I mention Conan O'Brien at this point! -- http://www.madgetwits.tk Madges Links http://home2.btconnect.com/kibo/PhotoAlbums/madgesphoto/
From: George Hammond on 2 May 2010 17:45 On Sun, 02 May 2010 17:31:01 -0400, raven1 <quoththeraven(a)nevermore.com> wrote: >On Sun, 02 May 2010 17:14:23 -0400, George Hammond ><Nowhere1(a)notspam.com> wrote: > >>Note: Please point out any logical inconsistencies > >For a start, you're assuming your conclusion that there's life after >death in the first place. > [Hammond] That is not a logical inconsistency. I never said LAD is proven, I'm just saying it's possible and even scientifically plausible. IOW there is noknown logical inconsistency in my scientific theory of LAD. QED ======================================== GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE Primary site http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond Mirror site http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 =======================================
From: Darrell Stec on 2 May 2010 17:56
George Hammond wrote: > LOGICAL PECULIARITIES OF LIFE AFTER DEATH > > Copyright George Hammond 2010 > > > Note: "LAD" = "Life After Death" > > Note: Please point out any logical inconsistencies > > > It occurs to me that there must be certain structural > rules as to what can or cannot occur in life after death > (LAD). I > George Hammond, M.S. Physics > You are right. There are rules. The first of which is "there is no life after death." -- Later, Darrell |