Prev: Understanding Relativity Requires Effort !?
Next: An Understanding of Gravity
From: BURT on 27 Apr 2010 22:53
On Apr 27, 11:47 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 26, 6:09 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "buenno" <ue38...(a)techemail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:4b5f145c-e4af-4127-8a36-04947cb15a89(a)c20g2000prb.googlegroups.com....
>
> > > here we go, the candy factory of relativity makes
> > > huge errors, they hope we cant observe
>
> > Nope
>
> > > length expansion not existent, only length contraction
>
> > Yeup .. if you are referring to a relativistic expansion similar but
> > opposite to length contraction.  Length of things can, of course, expand for
> > other reasons
>
> > > because they cant speed slower than staying still
>
> > That's right
>
> > > enough reason do discard their beloved theory!!!
>
> > Nope .. why on earth would that be a reason?
>
> > > universe expansion just prove that length expansion _do exists_
>
> > No
>
> > > relativity proved wrong by own theory
>
> > Nope
>
> > > good bye
>
> > Unlikely that a troll like you is actually going anywhere
>
> There are no flat atoms.
>
> Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Since when could atoms get fatter? or go flat?

Mitch Raemsch
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Understanding Relativity Requires Effort !?
Next: An Understanding of Gravity