Lester J Hendershot - The Hendershot Fuel Less Generator
in [Design]
|
From: jimp on 18 Sep 2009 14:30 In sci.physics Michael A. Terrell <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > > jimp(a)specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> In sci.physics Michael A. Terrell <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >> > >> > Cwatters wrote: >> >> >> >> "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message >> >> news:h6qdnVg0r6EtUy_XnZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d(a)earthlink.com... >> >> > >> >> > Cwatters wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> "gabydewilde" <gdewilde(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> news:9f535101-7a2a-47bd-81b7-ea35bf54d8e4(a)h30g2000vbr.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> On Sep 14, 7:38 pm, John Larkin wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> It's interesting how many free energy devices have been invented over >> >> >> >> the years, and how I'm still paying 30 cents per KWH. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >This is not surprising in any way. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Take democracy, this suggests the country belongs to the people. But >> >> >> >if we look at that what is charged for housing we can only conclude >> >> >> >slavery has been endorsed some how. You see, if the land belongs to >> >> >> >the people (you) then paying exorbitant heaps of cash for this land >> >> >> >doesn't seem to add up. >> >> >> >> >> >> I've yet to meet anyone who had sold their house for less than they were >> >> >> offered for it. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > I have. I bought one that needed some repairs to meet VA >> >> > requirements not long after I got out of the Army. The owner didn't have >> >> > the $8,000 to have the work done, so she knocked it off the asking >> >> > price. >> >> > Ii did the repairs for under $2,000 and that saved me over >> >> > $6,000 which was about 25% of the total price. >> >> > >> >> >> >> Knocking something off the price because of a defect is not the same thing >> >> at all, or are you saying you offered to pay the full price regardless of if >> >> she fixed the defect? >> > >> > >> > She was told that no loan was available without the repairs. She >> > couldn't afford to so them. If she had done them, the price of the >> > house would have gone up at least 50% since it was zoned for business, >> > and on a busy highway.. You do the math. >> >> If that is true, she is stupid. >> >> She could have obtained a short term loan to do the repairs and paid it >> back with part of that added 50% on the sales price. >> >> But in any case, "ifs" don't count when determining the sales price of >> something. >> >> A thing is worth what it is worth in the condition it is in at the time of >> the sale. > > > You think so? > > I was the only one who was interested in the property. It had been > on the market for almost six months. The woman had no credit, and was > living on welfare. She had three teenage kids. The realtor didn't even > want to show it to me, because of its condition, inside. If I hadn't > made the offer and bought it, she would have ended up in subsidized > housing. This was 35 years ago, before they gave away money to people > who couldn't pay it back. The realtor wasn't going to re-list the > property. The woman's husband had died two years earlier, and she > hadn't bothered to get it through probate. The house was over 100 years > old and had a lot of broken windows. She showed me one of her utility > bills for over $400. the highest I ever had was under $75, after the > repairs. that included the electricity used by my repair business. > > I offered what it was worth to me, but if I had know it was going to > take over six months for the probate, I would have kept looking and > bought something else. Yeah, OK, so she probably couldn't have gotten a fixup loan. That still has nothing to do with the fact that a thing is worth what it is worth in the condition it is in at the time of the sale. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply.
From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax on 18 Sep 2009 14:54 Benj wrote: > On Sep 12, 9:21 pm, "Don Kelly" <d...(a)shawcross.ca> wrote: > >>>> If it works, why aren't we all using them by now? >>> Because the CIA (or whatever they had back then), funded by the coal >>> companies, arrived in the dark of night, in black biplanes, and >>> sabotaged the machines and brainwashed everyone involved. >>> Next question? >> How come all this material "brutally" suppressed nearly 90 years ago, is >> somehow all over the net these days? > > You've been listening to Doug's lies again. Who says it's "all over > the net"? Yes the STORY of Hendershot is all over the net but the > essence of his invention is not. The essence of ANY of the suppressed > inventors is not. You think the people who were rich then are any less > rich now? Book burnings, attempted murders, actual murders, > mysterious lab burnings, mysterious break-ins with theft of papers, > nah. it's all imaginary. There is no CFR, there are no Trilaterals > these are all "conspiracy theories". There are no rich people in > control of stuff. It's all in your kooky imagination. > > The real question is are people really so Stooopid and dumbed down as > to believe any lies spewed on the internet by people who usually have > no names let alone credibility, because these clowns won't "like you" > if you point out they have nothing to back up what they say except > some vaguely plausible "theories". > > HEY YOU DUMMIES! THIS STUFF IS ON THE NET as well as in libraries. > You can research these stories for accuracy. To form an opinion > without doing so is unscientific and moronic. Notice that I am not > suggesting researching if their inventions actually work, I'm > suggesting that you research the FACTS of the opposition to these > inventions and the ACTS perpetrated against the inventors. THERE is > where the conspiracy lies. The looniest belief has to be chemtrails. -- Dirk http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK http://www.theconsensus.org/ - A UK political party http://www.onetribe.me.uk/wordpress/?cat=5 - Our podcasts on weird stuff
From: doug on 18 Sep 2009 16:06 Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: > Benj wrote: > >> On Sep 12, 9:21 pm, "Don Kelly" <d...(a)shawcross.ca> wrote: >> >>>>> If it works, why aren't we all using them by now? >>>> >>>> Because the CIA (or whatever they had back then), funded by the coal >>>> companies, arrived in the dark of night, in black biplanes, and >>>> sabotaged the machines and brainwashed everyone involved. >>>> Next question? >>> >>> How come all this material "brutally" suppressed nearly 90 years ago, is >>> somehow all over the net these days? >> >> >> You've been listening to Doug's lies again. Who says it's "all over >> the net"? Yes the STORY of Hendershot is all over the net but the >> essence of his invention is not. The essence of ANY of the suppressed >> inventors is not. This is one of Benj's usual lies. Take for example Meyer and his fraud. It is all there. He was even found guilty of fraud in a court. You think the people who were rich then are any less >> rich now? Book burnings, attempted murders, actual murders, >> mysterious lab burnings, mysterious break-ins with theft of papers, >> nah. it's all imaginary. There is no CFR, there are no Trilaterals >> these are all "conspiracy theories". There are no rich people in >> control of stuff. It's all in your kooky imagination. Such massive paranoia is not good for your health. >> >> The real question is are people really so Stooopid and dumbed down as >> to believe any lies spewed on the internet by people who usually have >> no names let alone credibility, because these clowns won't "like you" >> if you point out they have nothing to back up what they say except >> some vaguely plausible "theories". >> >> HEY YOU DUMMIES! THIS STUFF IS ON THE NET as well as in libraries. >> You can research these stories for accuracy. To form an opinion >> without doing so is unscientific and moronic. Notice that I am not >> suggesting researching if their inventions actually work, They do not work. If they worked, people would jump on them and get rich. Your stupidity is blinding you. I'm >> suggesting that you research the FACTS of the opposition to these >> inventions and the ACTS perpetrated against the inventors. THERE is >> where the conspiracy lies. Science is what is against the frauds. None of these things work since they violate the laws of physics. The frauds are designed to get money from gullible people like you. > > > The looniest belief has to be chemtrails. >
From: Androcles on 18 Sep 2009 16:34 "Dirk Bruere at NeoPax" <dirk.bruere(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:7hi3b2F2rhf09U2(a)mid.individual.net... > Benj wrote: >> On Sep 12, 9:21 pm, "Don Kelly" <d...(a)shawcross.ca> wrote: >> >>>>> If it works, why aren't we all using them by now? >>>> Because the CIA (or whatever they had back then), funded by the coal >>>> companies, arrived in the dark of night, in black biplanes, and >>>> sabotaged the machines and brainwashed everyone involved. >>>> Next question? >>> How come all this material "brutally" suppressed nearly 90 years ago, is >>> somehow all over the net these days? >> >> You've been listening to Doug's lies again. Who says it's "all over >> the net"? Yes the STORY of Hendershot is all over the net but the >> essence of his invention is not. The essence of ANY of the suppressed >> inventors is not. You think the people who were rich then are any less >> rich now? Book burnings, attempted murders, actual murders, >> mysterious lab burnings, mysterious break-ins with theft of papers, >> nah. it's all imaginary. There is no CFR, there are no Trilaterals >> these are all "conspiracy theories". There are no rich people in >> control of stuff. It's all in your kooky imagination. >> >> The real question is are people really so Stooopid and dumbed down as >> to believe any lies spewed on the internet by people who usually have >> no names let alone credibility, because these clowns won't "like you" >> if you point out they have nothing to back up what they say except >> some vaguely plausible "theories". >> >> HEY YOU DUMMIES! THIS STUFF IS ON THE NET as well as in libraries. >> You can research these stories for accuracy. To form an opinion >> without doing so is unscientific and moronic. Notice that I am not >> suggesting researching if their inventions actually work, I'm >> suggesting that you research the FACTS of the opposition to these >> inventions and the ACTS perpetrated against the inventors. THERE is >> where the conspiracy lies. > > The looniest belief has to be chemtrails. > Nah, the looniest belief is onetribe, the chief loon being Dork Bruehahahahahahahahah... "http://www.onetribe.me.uk/wordpress/?cat=5 - Our podcasts on weird stuff"
From: gabydewilde on 18 Sep 2009 19:01
On Sep 18, 5:30 am, "Don Kelly" <d...(a)shawcross.ca> wrote: > "Martin Brown" <|||newspam...(a)nezumi.demon.co.uk> wrote in message > > news:ROlsm.52732$4t6.22415(a)newsfe06.iad...> Benj wrote: > >> On Sep 12, 9:21 pm, "Don Kelly" <d...(a)shawcross.ca> wrote: > > >>>>> If it works, why aren't we all using them by now? > >>>> Because the CIA (or whatever they had back then), funded by the coal > >>>> companies, arrived in the dark of night, in black biplanes, and > >>>> sabotaged the machines and brainwashed everyone involved. > >>>> Next question? > >>> How come all this material "brutally" suppressed nearly 90 years ago, is > >>> somehow all over the net these days? > > ----------------- > > Please don't associate me with Benj or Gaby' s ideas. Benj, I can take up to > a point and have respect for some of his views. Gaby is directly out of > Keelynet which is a source of pipe dreams (what is in the pipe is another > story). I agree wth your response to Benj who has enough background to > actually think beyond some negative reaction to "the authorities" He does > have a persecution complex which gets in the way of his thinking. > -- > Don Kelly > d...(a)shawcross.ca > remove the x to reply-- > > P.S. I haven't been listening to Doug More folk psychology. Hey didn't mama learn you not to talk in the 3rd person donkey boy? |