Light Can Produce Non-Relativistic Observations.
in [Relativity]
|
From: guskz on 29 May 2010 14:46 A basic understanding of radio information signals & wave amplification is required. ------- The Relativistic Condition of Simultaneity: Light & fluid waves moving at the same low frequency can be observed to depart & arrive simultaneously at the same locations. Conclusion: #1. Light (EM-waves), moving or shifting to, lower frequencies will proportionally experience less Relativistic effects and provide less Relativistically affected observations such as length contraction and time dilation. #2. And logically, light's speed (meaning light waves traveling or shifting to lower frequencies) will no longer be constant.
From: eon on 29 May 2010 14:59 On May 29, 8:46 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > A basic understanding of radio information signals & wave > amplification is required. not for you seemingly > ------- > > The Relativistic Condition of Simultaneity: > > Light & fluid waves moving at the same low frequency can be observed > to depart & arrive simultaneously at the same locations. what fluid waves !? what LF ? > > Conclusion: > > #1. Light (EM-waves), moving or shifting to, lower frequencies will > proportionally experience less Relativistic effects and provide less > Relativistically affected observations such as length contraction and > time dilation. how LF would you go? tiil the wave stay still, then yes you are right > > #2. And logically, light's speed (meaning light waves traveling or no, the crests of the waves only > shifting to lower frequencies) will no longer be constant. what is the speed of standing wave light?
From: BURT on 29 May 2010 15:11 On May 29, 11:59 am, eon <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote: > On May 29, 8:46 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > A basic understanding of radio information signals & wave > > amplification is required. > > not for you seemingly > > > ------- > > > The Relativistic Condition of Simultaneity: > > > Light & fluid waves moving at the same low frequency can be observed > > to depart & arrive simultaneously at the same locations. > > what fluid waves !? > > what LF ? > > > > > Conclusion: > > > #1. Light (EM-waves), moving or shifting to, lower frequencies will > > proportionally experience less Relativistic effects and provide less > > Relativistically affected observations such as length contraction and > > time dilation. > > how LF would you go? > > tiil the wave stay still, then yes you are right > > > > > #2. And logically, light's speed (meaning light waves traveling or > > no, the crests of the waves only > > > shifting to lower frequencies) will no longer be constant. > > what is the speed of standing wave light? Light moves through the space frame at C. Mitch Raemsch
From: eon on 29 May 2010 15:19 On May 29, 9:11 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 29, 11:59 am, eon <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 29, 8:46 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > A basic understanding of radio information signals & wave > > > amplification is required. > > > not for you seemingly > > > > ------- > > > > The Relativistic Condition of Simultaneity: > > > > Light & fluid waves moving at the same low frequency can be observed > > > to depart & arrive simultaneously at the same locations. > > > what fluid waves !? > > > what LF ? > > > > Conclusion: > > > > #1. Light (EM-waves), moving or shifting to, lower frequencies will > > > proportionally experience less Relativistic effects and provide less > > > Relativistically affected observations such as length contraction and > > > time dilation. > > > how LF would you go? > > > tiil the wave stay still, then yes you are right > > > > #2. And logically, light's speed (meaning light waves traveling or > > > no, the crests of the waves only > > > > shifting to lower frequencies) will no longer be constant. > > > what is the speed of standing wave light? > > Light moves through the space frame at C. > > Mitch Raemsch no, light itself does not moves until you move, then you may put a speed c to it
From: BURT on 29 May 2010 15:24
On May 29, 12:19 pm, eon <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote: > On May 29, 9:11 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 29, 11:59 am, eon <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 29, 8:46 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > A basic understanding of radio information signals & wave > > > > amplification is required. > > > > not for you seemingly > > > > > ------- > > > > > The Relativistic Condition of Simultaneity: > > > > > Light & fluid waves moving at the same low frequency can be observed > > > > to depart & arrive simultaneously at the same locations. > > > > what fluid waves !? > > > > what LF ? > > > > > Conclusion: > > > > > #1. Light (EM-waves), moving or shifting to, lower frequencies will > > > > proportionally experience less Relativistic effects and provide less > > > > Relativistically affected observations such as length contraction and > > > > time dilation. > > > > how LF would you go? > > > > tiil the wave stay still, then yes you are right > > > > > #2. And logically, light's speed (meaning light waves traveling or > > > > no, the crests of the waves only > > > > > shifting to lower frequencies) will no longer be constant. > > > > what is the speed of standing wave light? > > > Light moves through the space frame at C. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > no, light itself does not moves until > you move, > > then you may put a speed c to it- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - No. You can move behind light while it inches ahead. You can get ahead of light and leave it behind in a motion black hole In either case your speed and light's is nearly the same and light appears to move only by inches more than you through space. Mitch Raemsch Mitch Raemsch |