Light speed is constan "c". I am puzzled
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Quantum vacuum fluctuations - Zero point infinities
Next: Quantum Gravity 397.1: What Would Happen if We Could Shrink A Human Observer Indefinitely?
From: BURT on 27 May 2010 19:46 On May 27, 4:38 pm, Edward Green <spamspamsp...(a)netzero.com> wrote: > sci.physics.relativity has degenerated into a conversation mainly > between ineducable morons... > > just felt like throwing something cheery into the mix. You can have a slow C. It is the same constant of light but in slower time of gravity. You can have the same speed but it can be slower or faster when at a different time rates of gravity. This is slow motion. It is the same speed but in slower time. Mitch Raemsch
From: Uncle Al on 27 May 2010 20:44 Edward Green wrote: > > sci.physics.relativity has degenerated into a conversation mainly > between ineducable morons... > > just felt like throwing something cheery into the mix. It's about time to wipe, pull up our pants, and move on as privy weevils descend to their basemnet feast. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
From: hanson on 28 May 2010 02:33 U-boat commander "Edward Green" <spamspamspam3(a)netzero.com> wrote: > Uncle rect-Al Schwartz wrote: It's about time to wipe, pull up our pants, and move on as privy weevils descend to their basemnet feast. > U-boat commander Green wrote just felt like throwing something cheery into the mix. sci.physics.relativity has degenerated into a conversation mainly between ineducable morons... > hanson wrote: .... ahahahaha... but they are funny, Ed!. All these many theories, from the many hard thinking, private researchers, are just as useful as are the tripes promulgated by the Einstein Dingleberries who dangle on/from the hair of Albert's sphincter and worship there in the warm & cozy breeze of Einstein's farts. > So, as you can see, C'mander: It's all relative. Absolutely! Thanks for the laughs, dude... and don't crank yourself. Self-cranking is Uncle rect-Al's Purview and Prerogative, which he demonstrates here in his own basement... as seen on his own website. http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg Thanks for the laughs guys, ahahaha... ahahahanson
From: spudnik on 28 May 2010 17:58 interesting thread; is one cycle of the wave, to be considered the wavelength and quantum of "photon?" note that the OP immediately falls to the typical linearization of the "wave" (in space), as with de Broglie's "guidewave" for teh self- assumed particulate meaning of "photon" -- cause that's what Einstein, thought at the time -- is it in the 1905 paper? there is certainly one place where a lightwave of pure frequency, looks like a sine-wave: in an oscilloscopic trace of a wire, or other "spacetime" referent -- Death to the lightconeheads; long-live Minkowski! > >> Like absolute zero, Planck offered a minimum distance. Which is > >> therefore a minimum wavelength. has anyone figured out what the > >> resulting maximum frequency mite be? > > Correct about maximum temperature, although I have no idea how hot or > > cold photons get. > E = hí thusNso: time isn't reversible, just because you can draw a "worldline" on a piece of "1+1dimensional paper;" that is just a kind of phase-space, strictly a mathematical fromalism a la hamiltonians & lagrangians. yes, phase-spaces in electronics e.g. might be formally "reversible," but, so, What?... you mean, like the "space-time flipbook" of Lawd Rees? thusNso: "retrodiction" of Bode's law for atoms? hey, Kepler was far more correct than is allowed, even though he only had the seven planets of astrology -- and, he was Court Astrologer. there was an article in *Fusion*, that had a formularium that worked for all of the planets, and all of the moons of all of the plants, as I recall. (of course, they/we are a bunch of platonists, anyway .-) thusNso: as Tim LocquaciousHand implies, "composition" of two rotations, one after the other, is not commutative, as the demonstration also can be modeled with quaternion multiplications; in any case, two rotations resolve into one, about a different axis. the question is, if you try to do them simultaneously, what happens? and, please, see if you can show it with quaternions, instead of this interminable blabfest; thank *you*. thusNso: Dear woould-be replacer of Jerry "no oil, except from Texas etc." Brown: no change from Jerry Brown's '69 "platform," eh? it is intolerably strange, insofar as we do need "fossilized fuels TM (sik)," to not get our share from our own "reserves." really, though, it is merely biomass, and the techniques have progressed since '69. Dubya's bro's ban offshore of Florida (and Louisiana) seemed like a tactical maneuver to support the oilcos' scarcity programme in our state. (why O why O why do folks believe, that the oilcos did not support the Kyoto Protoccol, which was just another cap'n'trade "free trade" nostrum, that Dubya'd have undoubtdely signed, if he had been told?) British Petroleum, the balls-out advocate of cap'n'trade, "Beyond Petroleum," is also the biggest company in the Alaska North Slope -- doesn't any body wonder, why no-one asked Palin about her BP-employed hubbie, and his Seccesionist ideals? one must take into consideration, with all of the hype about it, that oil comes out of the ground underwater in "seeps," under pressure. so, how much would come out, if BP et al ad vomitorium were not pumping like crazy? Waxman's current cap'n'trade bill just mandatorizes the huge, voluntary cap'n'trade since 2003 -- tens of billions in hedging per annum. what the Liberal Media (Ownwd by consWervative) don't talk about, is that he brought the first cap'n'trade bill in '91, under HW (who worked with Gore on the Kyoto cap'n'trade). what it amounts to, as Waxman basically admitted to, when he was at UCLA, is "let the arbitrageurs raise the price of energy, as much as they can in the 'free market' -- free beer, freedom!" a small, adjustable carbon tax would achieve the same ends -- as I even read "in passing" in a guest editorial in the WSUrinal, as well as from an "expert" in a UCLA seminar, but who said that it was (some how) "politically impossible" -- without being the Last Bailout of Wall Street (an the City of London). thusNso: I never read a word about Palin's hubbie's Seccesh "movement" in the Liberal Media (Owned by consWervatives) and that is sort-of the issue in AZ. I'm all for kids whose parents managed to sneak across the border & give birth, but I was taken aback by the "sense of entitlement" that the older kids have, about college (the DREAM Act; I stated to a group of them, that crossing the border is essentially a Mexican "rite of passage," and it is certainly not very dangerous as a proper hike, if you check the FAQs and maps & so forth from the Mexican goment (and those advocacy/ haven groups in the USA; it may be difficult in the summer, though). well, it's either that or college *in* Mexico, or you'll probably be made to join a gang. La Raza d'Atzlan are openly racist, not just by their title; at least, that's the impression that I got, attending one of their meetings at UCLA, two or three years ago -- it's in their God-am constitution. of course, teh real problem is "free trade," and this is already here to roost; the little spill in the Gulf is being used by British Petroleum -- which is also the #1 driller in the Alaska North Slope, that Ted Palin works for -- to create an "outsourcing" mandate to solve the problem, because we can't do it with our post-industrial cargo cult. well, iscrew that! read LaRouche, if you want to know the history with Lincoln and his "Spot Resolutions;" Cinco de Mayo should be a pan-american holiday! --Light: A History! http://wlym.com
From: BURT on 28 May 2010 21:40
C is constant in the space frame. A light wave is dual sin waves at right angles to one another. Mitch Raemsch |