Logic
in [Science]
|
Give me ONE digit position of any real that isn't computable up to that digit position! Transfer Principle <lwalke3(a)lausd.net> writes: I agree with Knox, somewhat. I'm grateful that she at least acknowledges the existence of theories other than standard/classical ZFC. But, at least according to Herc, Knox still won't acknowledge Herc's own theory (or should I say, _theories_, since Cooper... 15 Jun 2010 17:39
Give me ONE digit position of any real that isn't computable up to that digit position! On 6/06/2010 2:53 AM, Olivier wrote: Sylvia Else a �crit : [...] A computer is a finite state machine, so although it may continue to compute forever, its outputs must start to repeat. So so so very false -- Maybe you should have a look at van der Waerden's Theorem to get to understand how wro... 5 Jun 2010 22:23
Give me ONE digit position of any real that isn't computable up to that digit position! "Olivier" <Olve(a)nowhere.wd> wrote ... Sylvia Else a �crit : [...] A computer is a finite state machine, so although it may continue to compute forever, its outputs must start to repeat. So so so very false -- Maybe you should have a look at van der Waerden's Theorem to get to understand how wrong ... 5 Jun 2010 21:18
uncountable infinity without Cantor's diagonal proof This will be old hat for many of you. I'm working in ZFC. The natural numbers 0,1,2... can be put into one-one correspondence with all ordered pairs of natural numbers. The reals can be put into one-one correspondence with all subsets of natural numbers. Now let N be the set of the natural numbers and consid... 6 Jun 2010 22:46
Give me ONE digit position of any real that isn't computable up to that digit position! Sylvia Else a �crit : [...] A computer is a finite state machine, so although it may continue to compute forever, its outputs must start to repeat. So so so very false -- Maybe you should have a look at van der Waerden's Theorem to get to understand how wrong is your argument. Anyway, the set of automa... 5 Jun 2010 13:36
All laws in science are based upon explanations of observations. All explanations are theoretical. Therefore laws are theories. On Jun 4, 9:57 pm, Charlie-Boo <shymath...(a)gmail.com> wrote: When people try to define some branch of science, typically what they describe applies to all of science. The above goes one better: It applies to any cognative process. Why is it particular to physics? If you read the definition, would y... 14 Jun 2010 18:30
BP OIL SPILL PREDICTIONS WAS Re: THE HOLY GRAIL "Ostap Bender" <ostap_bender_1900(a)hotmail.com> wrote Ask anything you want-to-know [...] Ok. About the Gulf of Mexico B.P. related oil spill: - Will Florida be affected by the end of 2010? 2001 (close!) - Will the Chairman or CEO resign this year? Man Of The House (mill... 5 Jun 2010 08:08
LAPTOP RECOVERY LAPTOP RECOVERY ****** http://sites.google.com/site/payperclickaffiliatesearn/ *** http://sites.google.com/site/medicalmalpracticelawmichigan/ *** http://sites.google.com/site/onlineinsurancequotesapply/ *** http://sites.google.com/site/laptopdatarecoverysoftware/ *** http://sites.google.com/site/benchmarklen... 5 Jun 2010 05:59
Give me ONE digit position of any real that isn't computableup to that digit position! On 5/06/2010 7:55 AM, |-|ercules wrote: According to sci.math, the number line consists mostly of "dark numbers". You see, 99.999999.... nearly % of real numbers are not computable, there is no program that represents them. A computer can calculate ANY digit sequence up to INFINITE length. Sc... 12 Jun 2010 12:40 |