Logic
in [Science]
|
I request of NANA to expunge all Hughes posts where my name is at the bottom Re: An Ultrafinite Set Theory In article <00537029-ea1e-4c83-a597-998c26607676(a)o30g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, Transfer Principle <lwalke3(a)lausd.net> wrote: [SNIP] And so this gives us another generalization about the difference between standard theorists and "cranks" (which maight be viewed as a "lie"): standard theorists believe th... 11 Jun 2010 00:33
What's the Holdup With 3-D Monitors? Stereo vision should be easy with LCD monitors. Just polarize every other pixel one way and the remaining half 90 degrees. If the orientation of each pixel could be changed back and forth quickly enough then both images could come from the same set of pixels. It should also be easy to make stereo compatible w... 16 Jun 2010 01:17
Simple hack to get $500 to your home Simple hack to get $500 to your home at http://ukfullenjoy.co.cc Due to high security risks,i have hidden the cheque link in an image. in that website on left side below search box, click on image and enter your name and address where you want to receive your cheque.please dont tell to anyone. ... 10 Jun 2010 10:00
Give me ONE digit position of any real that isn't computableup to that digit position! Transfer Principle wrote: I want to see a thread which starts with a poster discussing a theory other than ZF(C), Sure. I started a thread call "A more restrictive set theory" (Oct. 10, 2009) but there didn't seem much discussion. The main idea there is placing a restriction as to what sets would exist... 12 Jun 2010 14:53
Give me ONE digit position of any real that isn't computable up Transfer Principle says... In short, I want to see a counterexample to Little's statement that: "The vast majority of posts arguing against ZFC or its theorems in sci.math are actually from incompetent cranks." Thus, I want to see a post arguing against ZFC that's from a competent poster. You'r... 16 Jun 2010 23:13
"NO BOX CONTAINS THE BOX NUMBERS THAT DON'T CONTAIN THEIR OWN BOX NUMBER" ~ XEN WM <mueckenh(a)rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes: There is a list that contains every real number that can be contained in a list: 0 1 00 01 10 11 000 ... Some people claim that further real numbers could be defined by infinite words (sequences). But that is wrong. It is true that a... 10 Jun 2010 01:18
Can N be constructed? If this question is denied, then it is impossible to construct a Cantor list and it is impossible to count beyond any finite number. If N can be constructed, then the elements n can be constructed in the unary system as an infinite sequence of finite sequences of 1's (i.e. as a list of finite sequences) 1 11 ... 14 Jun 2010 21:50
"NO BOX CONTAINS THE BOX NUMBERS THAT DON'T CONTAIN THEIR OWN BOX NUMBER" ~ XEN (from the "Xenides dies" thread) For *all* N, the sequence differs from the Nth entry in the list at the Nth digit (and possibly other positions as well). It is new because for *every* sequence in the list, the question "is it the same as this sequence" is answered "no". So you think the antidiago... 12 Jun 2010 02:52
Discarded [was: Re: A BLATENT FLAW in Cantor's diag proof] |-|ercules wrote: "Daryl McCullough" <stevendaryl3016(a)yahoo.com> wrote ... Here's what's funny about USENET. In a regular classroom, you have one teacher and many students. In a typical USENET discussion, there are many teachers and just one student. You'd think that such a low student/te... 9 Jun 2010 01:00
Thus Spake Xy Borg Thus Spake Xy Borg Hear, ye, Brethren. Here ye. Long didst I sojourn in the Valley of CERN. Yay! Long have I mediated upon the Splendor and Magnificence of the ONE, by Whose Will and Fiat all of Glaxo came into being. Long was I lost in the sweetness of meditation upon His glory, subsisting only on the alms be... 9 Jun 2010 16:27 |