Prev: Cosmic Blackbody Microwave Background Radiation proves Atom Totality and dismisses Big Bang Chapt 3 #150; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: "NO BOX CONTAINS THE BOX NUMBERS THAT DON'T CONTAIN THEIR OWN BOX NUMBER" ~ XEN
From: spudnik on 9 Jun 2010 01:50
don't know, why, that link didn't work to Maui's Tanawa.
http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/articles/fall01/Tanawa/tanawa.html

thus quoth:
For our first "proof-of-principle"experimental observations of the
motion of the Moon, in order to determine longitude on Earth, our
measurements were done with a "stripped down"torquetum, without the
23.5-degree wedge installed. This minimal torquetum had only the
14"equatorial circle, pointing to the celestial equator, which
directly measured a sidereal angle along the celestial sphere, known
as lunar distance.

What Is a Torquetum?

thus&so:
best thing would be a mild hurricane,
to spread the fertilizer over the land. longterm effects
of dispersant may be the worse thing, now,
when it'd all have evaporated or been eaten by the foodweb,
relatively soonly, as per normal with "[organic] seeps
of oil in the Gulf (1XXValdez/annum [whilst 'we' are
pumping like crazy])" (*Sci.Am.*) and
off of Redondo Beach.

thus&so:
s/he/it reposts the same experiment with fullerenes,
several times per day per item -- and I *still* do
like any version of Young's two-pinhole/100y.a.Newton
total destruction of the corpuscular "theory;"
it was not a theory, when mister Hypothisis Non Fingo
gave it.

"particle/wave duality" is not even a false dichotomy;
it is akin to Pascal's two-column proofs
in projective geometry: one does not read both,
at the very same time. (Schroedinger's cat is dead;
long-live Schroedinger's cat!)

so, whereinat does a "rock o'light" impart a "momentum,"
ballistically, to an atom?... When the Moon hits your eye,
like a big pizza pie, that's the ballistical theory of light!

> "Particle" and "wave" are HUMAN abstractions that turn out not

thus&so:
I have only seen you paste Wikipops into these fora;
eh?... as for [macro-guy], he does know how
to use that macro, where he never bothers
to analyze any specifics of some experiment with fullerenes
(I mean, if I were citing it, that's what I'd do, because
it would be interesting ... yes, and it really would be, but
he hasn't bothered to cite who or what the study is,
so that we could do his homework for him, again .-)

thusNso:
the voluntary cap&trade is tens of millions of $ US -- I mean,
In Fed/FEMA/Consumer's Digest Notes We Trust --
per year in hedgies (since '03), although the Urinal refers
to Waxman's bill as "cap&tax," and it is exactly teh same
-- as far as I know & what little Waxman told me --
as his '91 cap&trade, which the Urinal will (occaisionally)
say was as good or better than machine-slicing bread.

> Chicago trillion dollar "Cap and Trade" exchange. They aren't real
> science classes at all but "science appreciation" classes held for art

thusNso:
I take it back, reserving judgement
til I don't googol it, but the matter
of taking the fix on a vehicle with radar,
begs the question, Just how does the device go-
about detecting it?... well,
a simple interference of the reflecting waves,
with the referent of the outgoing waves,
could essentially be dopplerian; eh?

thus&so:
Klein's 3rd volume of _Geometry..Advanced Standpoint_,
try _The Icosahedron_.

--Stop BP's and Waxman's aritrageur's rip-off,
facetiously a.k.a. cap&tax in WSUrinal community;
institute a tiny carbon tax, instead!
http://wlym.com
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Cosmic Blackbody Microwave Background Radiation proves Atom Totality and dismisses Big Bang Chapt 3 #150; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: "NO BOX CONTAINS THE BOX NUMBERS THAT DON'T CONTAIN THEIR OWN BOX NUMBER" ~ XEN