From: Del Cecchi on 15 Feb 2006 09:41 Keith wrote: > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:52:17 +0000, Gary L. wrote: > > >>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:47:30 GMT, Gary L. <nospam(a)sbcglobal.net> >>wrote: >> >> >>>>>>>You activated the same copy more than once a month every month for 2 >>>>>>>years? >>>> >>>>Hell no. And I cant imagine anybody would bother with the whole activation >>>>mess. Everytime I install XP (client/friend/company computer) first thing >>>>I do is to apply no_activation patch. There is no obligation or law to put >>>>up with this inconvenience, at least not in my country. >> >>Ok, the country appears to be Poland: > > > Note the nym; "hackbox". Doesn't that say it all? > No. Used to be a guy posting to comp.arch from IBM Watson Research Center as "Hack" as I recall -- Del Cecchi "This post is my own and doesn?t necessarily represent IBM?s positions, strategies or opinions.?
From: Mike Tomlinson on 1 Mar 2006 03:03 In article <mr0ku1ln83gj0lo7t4ls4if2i0cbnjsdam(a)4ax.com>, George Macdonald <fammacd=!SPAM^nothanks(a)tellurian.com> writes >I'd suggest you try it - it does *NOT* work in Win2K SP4 if the device is >not present. I've just tried it to remove a CD-writer which I took out some time ago. The procedure outline by Gary worked fine (Win2k Pro SP4.) -- (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.
From: Mike Tomlinson on 1 Mar 2006 03:04 In article <5T9Hf.27081$Jd.25490(a)newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>, Gary L. <nospam(a)sbcglobal.net> writes >The Control Panel Applet definitely shows things that Device Manager >doesn't. Whether that's a mistake or a feature is another question. Control Panel in Safe Mode here (Win2k Pro SP4) shows all hardware that has ever been present, and allows me to remove absent devices. -- (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.
From: George Macdonald on 2 Mar 2006 05:40 On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 08:03:19 +0000, Mike Tomlinson <mike(a)NOSPAM.jasper.org.uk> wrote: >In article <mr0ku1ln83gj0lo7t4ls4if2i0cbnjsdam(a)4ax.com>, George >Macdonald <fammacd=!SPAM^nothanks(a)tellurian.com> writes > >>I'd suggest you try it - it does *NOT* work in Win2K SP4 if the device is >>not present. > >I've just tried it to remove a CD-writer which I took out some time ago. >The procedure outline by Gary worked fine (Win2k Pro SP4.) Christ you're a bit late to err, contribute?? Seems like I have more experience with this than you - it doesn't work 100% reliably. -- Rgds, George Macdonald
From: Mike Tomlinson on 3 Mar 2006 16:33 In article <l22c02popb2f45gjr0v1oila59d7lk4fla(a)4ax.com>, George Macdonald <fammacd=!SPAM^nothanks(a)tellurian.com> writes >Christ you're a bit late to err, contribute?? :) > Seems like I have more >experience with this than you Possibly. I'm not sure how you can tell. > - it doesn't work 100% reliably. This system I'm using now has been upgraded from Dos 6.22 to Win 3.1 to Win95 to Win98 to Win98SE to Win2000. Hardware-wise, it's been upgraded from a 486SX thru Pentiums of various speeds and is now an XP3200+. I've always migrated the OS to new hardware, and applied upgrades instead of fresh installs. Therefore there are MANY absent items listed in Control Panel/Add-Remove Hardware. I've just removed several (~2 dozen) items of absent hardware using the procedure outlined earlier without any issue whatsoever. Win2k SP4. Your move. -- (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: Will PC3200 RAM make a difference? Next: Installing Ubuntu on a REALLY old computer |