MBAM Version 1.43 (December 30th, 2009)
in [Spyware]
|
From: Cronos on 31 Dec 2009 07:11 Dustin Cook wrote: > There is no such thing as a shareware version of Malwarebytes. It's always > been free for non commercial home use; The only difference between the paid > and free "versions" is the IP blocking and protection module features. If > you want those, we kindly ask you pay for them. Otherwise, use the program > as much as you like, for free; no trial, no time limits, no nag screens. No > "shareware". > > I do, and thank you kindly for such a good and free app. :)
From: siljaline on 31 Dec 2009 13:04 Dustin Cook wrote: > There is no such thing as a shareware version of Malwarebytes. It's always > been free for non commercial home use; The only difference between the paid > and free "versions" is the IP blocking and protection module features. If > you want those, we kindly ask you pay for them. Otherwise, use the program > as much as you like, for free; no trial, no time limits, no nag screens. No > "shareware". Thanks, this has been established, after a period of dismay > <http://www.malwarebytes.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=34991> Silj -- "Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from -- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time." - Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_
From: Dustin Cook on 31 Dec 2009 19:47 "siljaline" <spam(a)uce.gov> wrote in news:hhip36$af6$1(a)news.eternal-september.org: > Dustin Cook wrote: >> There is no such thing as a shareware version of Malwarebytes. It's > always >> been free for non commercial home use; The only difference between >> the > paid >> and free "versions" is the IP blocking and protection module >> features. > If >> you want those, we kindly ask you pay for them. Otherwise, use the > program >> as much as you like, for free; no trial, no time limits, no nag > screens. No >> "shareware". > > Thanks, this has been established, after a period of dismay > > <http://www.malwarebytes.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=34991> > > Silj > Yes. I know. Apologies for the confusion. The individuals responsible shall be flogged forthwith! :) -- .... Those are my thoughts anyways...
From: Dustin Cook on 31 Dec 2009 19:48 ASCII <me2(a)privacy.net> wrote in news:4b3e1b0a.7964265(a)EDCBIC: > Dustin Cook wrote: >>The only difference between the paid >>and free "versions" is the IP blocking and protection module features. > > Would that 'IP blocking' be accomplished with a concocted hosts file, > like you so vehemently denied recently? > > Go suck another cigarette, you sickly loser! Did you intend to respond to me here? Our IP blocking doesn't use a hosts file; so, yea, I have to deny that it would. -- .... Those are my thoughts anyways...
From: siljaline on 31 Dec 2009 21:15
Dustin Cook wrote: > Yes. I know. Apologies for the confusion. The individuals responsible > shall be flogged forthwith! :) This is a good thing ;) Silj -- "Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from -- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time." - Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_ |