From: jdawe on 5 Jan 2010 20:29 Because we are living in a logically created opposing universe we know there are only 2 opposing forces: Pull force or Push force In other words: Attraction force or Repulsion force So, why then do we sometimes hear that magnetism is a separate force to gravity because while it does attract things it does so differently therefore it's a different force. Well, there are two opposing directions we can take: Forward or Reverse which means that we can step into our 2 opposing forces to give us: Forward attraction force or Reverse attraction force + Forward repulsion force or Reverse repulsion force Now, magnets produce repulsion force NOT attraction force but the funny thing is if you put an object producing forward repulsion force in proximity to an object producing reverse repulsion force then the 2 objects will ATTRACT. But its not real attraction force its just the result of 2 objects coming together because one is 'pushing' one oway and the other is 'pushing' the other way. Therefore, the acceleration of the objects being 'attracted' by magnetism is different than the acceleration caused by real attraction force. -Josh.
From: nuny on 5 Jan 2010 21:07 On Jan 5, 5:29 pm, jdawe <mrjd...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Because we are living in a logically created opposing universe we know > there are only 2 opposing forces: > > Pull force > > or > > Push force > > In other words: > > Attraction force > > or > > Repulsion force > > So, why then do we sometimes hear that magnetism is a separate force > to gravity because while it does attract things it does so differently > therefore it's a different force. > > Well, > > there are two opposing directions we can take: > > Forward > > or > > Reverse > > which means that we can step into our 2 opposing forces to give us: > > Forward attraction force > > or > > Reverse attraction force > > + > > Forward repulsion force > > or > > Reverse repulsion force > > Now, magnets produce repulsion force NOT attraction force but the > funny thing is if you put an object producing forward repulsion force > in proximity to an object producing reverse repulsion force then the 2 > objects will ATTRACT. But its not real attraction force its just the > result of 2 objects coming together because one is 'pushing' one oway > and the other is 'pushing' the other way. > > Therefore, the acceleration of the objects being 'attracted' by > magnetism is different than the acceleration caused by real attraction > force. Ian Wallace did this better than you, but then he actually *sold* the science-fiction he wrote. Mark L. Fergerson
From: Raymond Yohros on 5 Jan 2010 22:00 On Jan 5, 5:29 pm, jdawe <mrjd...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Because we are living in a logically created opposing universe we know > there are only 2 opposing forces: > > Pull force > > or > > Push force > > In other words: > > Attraction force > > or > > Repulsion force > do youreself a favor and learn before you talk use google and wikipedia or else you're wasting your time
From: Cwatters on 6 Jan 2010 06:23 "jdawe" <mrjdawe(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:a9438d51-cb0c-415e-8014-308ce0b5ad84(a)c34g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > So, why then do we sometimes hear that magnetism is a separate force > to gravity Ever tried to shield gravity?
From: Androcles on 6 Jan 2010 06:46 "Cwatters" <colin.wattersNOSPAM(a)TurnersOakNOSPAM.plus.com> wrote in message news:4qSdnXcyaIdc79nWnZ2dnUVZ8jqdnZ2d(a)brightview.co.uk... > > "jdawe" <mrjdawe(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:a9438d51-cb0c-415e-8014-308ce0b5ad84(a)c34g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... >> So, why then do we sometimes hear that magnetism is a separate force >> to gravity > > Ever tried to shield gravity? Yeah, I have a magnet levitated under the shelf of my desk by a magnet on the top of the shelf. The magnets are from an old hard drive. It's that one marked "actuator": http://zone.ni.com/cms/imaes/devzone/tut/Hard%20Drive%20Basics%201.png If I slip a coin between the shelf and the magnet the coin doesn't fall, the magnet shields gravity.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: quark content of nucleons Next: FR Bending of Light = GR 1919 Eddington Experiment |