From: siljaline on 29 Apr 2010 16:38 Announcement > <http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?showtopic=48801> Changelog <quote> 1. Added new scheduling engine for our customers featuring realtime updating, more finely-grained scheduled scanning/updating, and a streamlined interface. 2. Added new flash scanning option which searches for malicious objects in memory and load point locations. 3. Added compatibility with Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) for our corporate customers. 4. Added a brand new advanced heuristics detection module named Shuriken that will be integrated into both scanner and protection module. 5. Integrated website blocking options and other customizable policies into the main program interface. 6. Heavily improved command line interface allowing customers to scan and remove automatically and silently. 7. Heavily improved updating module which should solve various updating issues. Also added full proxy support including authentication and integration into the GUI. 8. Fixed a large number of various issues and enhanced overall stability of the scanner and protection module. </quote> (Or) > <http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?showtopic=3283&st=40&gopid=241494&#entry241494> Silj -- "Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from -- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time." - Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_
From: Dustin Cook on 29 Apr 2010 16:53 "siljaline" <spam(a)uce.gov> wrote in news:hrcqnf$3hb$1(a)news.eternal-september.org: > Announcement > > <http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?showtopic=48801> > > Changelog > <quote> > 1. Added new scheduling engine for our customers featuring realtime > updating, more finely-grained scheduled scanning/updating, and a > streamlined interface. 2. Added new flash scanning option which > searches for malicious objects in memory and load point locations. 3. > Added compatibility with Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) for our > corporate customers. 4. Added a brand new advanced heuristics > detection module named Shuriken that will be integrated into both > scanner and protection module. 5. Integrated website blocking options > and other customizable policies into the main program interface. 6. > Heavily improved command line interface allowing customers to scan and > remove automatically and silently. 7. Heavily improved updating module > which should solve various updating issues. Also added full proxy > support including authentication and integration into the GUI. 8. > Fixed a large number of various issues and enhanced overall stability > of the scanner and protection module. </quote> > (Or) > > <http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?showtopic=3283&st=40&gopid=24 > 1494&#entry241494> > > Silj > > WOwa... thats... ehh, another short beta testing... hope it goes well... -- "Hrrngh! Someday I'm going to hurl this...er...roll this...hrrngh.. nudge this boulder right down a cliff." - Goblin Warrior
From: siljaline on 29 Apr 2010 18:13 Dustin Cook wrote: > WOwa... thats... ehh, another short beta testing... hope it goes well... There are many well known Industry folk behind this product, they know what they are doing. If you want to know why this was a short-run Beta, ask in the Forum, last I looked, news:alt.privacy.spyware wasn't support for MBAM. Silj -- "Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from -- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time." - Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_
From: Dustin Cook on 29 Apr 2010 18:28 "siljaline" <spam(a)uce.gov> wrote in news:hrd08s$mq0$1(a)news.eternal- september.org: > Dustin Cook wrote: >> WOwa... thats... ehh, another short beta testing... hope it goes > well... > > There are many well known Industry folk behind this product, they know > what they are doing. If you want to know why this was a short-run Beta, > ask in the Forum, last I looked, news:alt.privacy.spyware wasn't support > for MBAM. Yea.. I know the research and development teams well, thanks. I don't need the attitude. -- "Hrrngh! Someday I'm going to hurl this...er...roll this...hrrngh.. nudge this boulder right down a cliff." - Goblin Warrior
From: Andy Walker on 29 Apr 2010 18:47
Dustin Cook wrote: >"siljaline" <spam(a)uce.gov> wrote in news:hrd08s$mq0$1(a)news.eternal- >september.org: > >> Dustin Cook wrote: >>> WOwa... thats... ehh, another short beta testing... hope it goes >> well... >> >> There are many well known Industry folk behind this product, they know >> what they are doing. If you want to know why this was a short-run Beta, >> ask in the Forum, last I looked, news:alt.privacy.spyware wasn't support >> for MBAM. > >Yea.. I know the research and development teams well, thanks. I don't need >the attitude. Jeez, I guess so. He posts these updates on Usenet and then thinks people shouldn't discuss them on Usenet? I'm Sorry, but it just doesn't work like that, Silj. This an UNmoderated group for the discussion of spyware and the software that can fix or prevent it...among other things. |