Prev: Why do we need cameras like the D700 or D3s?
Next: How to fix tiny tear in camera bag before it widens?
From: George Kerby on 22 Feb 2010 11:34 On 2/21/10 6:26 PM, in article 4b81cf43$0$1594$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net, "Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote: > George Kerby <ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 2/20/10 9:19 PM, in article 4b80a632$0$1633$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net, "Ray >> Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote: >> >>> Rich <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Feb 18, 2:15�pm, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: >>>>> RichA �<rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> And this one is only 45 megapixels, not 60. >>>>> >>>>> Rich is an idiot who thinks that image quality is the ONLY >>>>> consideration. �Except, of course, when it comes to his own wallet. >>>>> >>>>>> �Interesting thing, I'd >>>>>> have expected going from 12-24 megapixels to show at least a great a >>>>>> detail jump as going from 24-48 megapixels, but that isn't the case >>>>>> here. >>>>> >>>>> And it's kind of hard to do sports photography at less than one frame >>>>> per second. >>>>> >>>>>> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=30419028 >>>> >>>> High quality landscape work, studio product shots, the medium format >>>> clobbers the FX. >>> >>> Bullshit. Medium-format cameras are specialized cameras with limited >>> uses. >> >> Speakith the > > Go away, idiot. Try again when you have something other than your > screeching hate to contribute. You are like the little kindergarten child, who, when presented the truth, starts screaming "NAW-NAW! NO - NO!!! Naw! NOOOOO!!!", while covering his ears and stamping his little feet. Fish-Head Rot, it is YOU who needs to look in the mirror for the non-contributor.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Why do we need cameras like the D700 or D3s? Next: How to fix tiny tear in camera bag before it widens? |