From: Chris Ridd on
On 2009-10-12 08:13:38 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh
<jaimie(a)sometimes.sessile.org> said:

> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:10:04 +0100, Chris Ridd <chrisridd(a)mac.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2009-10-11 22:36:07 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh
>> <jaimie(a)sometimes.sessile.org> said:
>>
>>> It may well not have all those interesting techie bits in the back any
>>> more, it was definitely on a downward spiral and I've not read any
>>> for, um, probably four years.
>>
>> And now of course, you can't read it because it was shut down.
>
> Oh. That probably means they did indeed continue with the interesting
> techie bits, rather than convert over to the usual reproducing of
> press releases, '100 confusing things about Windows' and 'build a pc'
> guides that the others all do.

Sorry, I was thinking of PCW not PC Pro.

--
Chris

From: Duncan Kennedy on
In message <1j7g001.1khvuon9cnkrpN%peter(a)cara.demon.co.uk>, Peter
Ceresole <peter(a)cara.demon.co.uk> writes
>Duncan Kennedy <nospam(a)nospam.otterson-bg.couk> wrote:
>
>> As somebody said, Monster Maze was a big step at the time.
>
>Did you watch Charlie Brooker's 'Gamewipe' this past week? It used 3-D
>Monster maze as a (good) example; that's what reminded me of it.

Missed that.

Were you not involved in writing for something 'way back, Peter? Zx
/Amsttrad / Atari?

--
Duncan K
Downtown Dalgety Bay
From: chris on
Chris Ridd wrote:
> On 2009-10-11 22:36:07 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh
> <jaimie(a)sometimes.sessile.org> said:
>
>> It may well not have all those interesting techie bits in the back any
>> more, it was definitely on a downward spiral and I've not read any
>> for, um, probably four years.
>
> And now of course, you can't read it because it was shut down.

What do you mean? The site and magazine are still available...
From: Chris Ridd on
On 2009-10-12 10:52:02 +0100, chris <ithinkiam(a)gmail.com> said:

> Chris Ridd wrote:
>> On 2009-10-11 22:36:07 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh
>> <jaimie(a)sometimes.sessile.org> said:
>>
>>> It may well not have all those interesting techie bits in the back any
>>> more, it was definitely on a downward spiral and I've not read any
>>> for, um, probably four years.
>>
>> And now of course, you can't read it because it was shut down.
>
> What do you mean? The site and magazine are still available...

Wrong mag, sorry. I mentally equated articles slagging of non-Windows
boxen with what PCW used to do...
--
Chris

From: chris on
Chris Ridd wrote:
> On 2009-10-12 10:52:02 +0100, chris <ithinkiam(a)gmail.com> said:
>
>> Chris Ridd wrote:
>>> On 2009-10-11 22:36:07 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh
>>> <jaimie(a)sometimes.sessile.org> said:
>>>
>>>> It may well not have all those interesting techie bits in the back any
>>>> more, it was definitely on a downward spiral and I've not read any
>>>> for, um, probably four years.
>>> And now of course, you can't read it because it was shut down.
>> What do you mean? The site and magazine are still available...
>
> Wrong mag, sorry. I mentally equated articles slagging of non-Windows
> boxen with what PCW used to do...

Phew... I quite like PCPro.