More Idiocy
in [Math]
|
Prev: HOPE RESEARCH -- THE SQUARE ROOT OF 1( UNDERROOT), RECIPROCAL EQUALIZATION OF THE SQRT OF 2 AND 0.5-- CLARIFICATION OF TRIUNE DIFFERENTIAL OF 1
Next: Pons asinorum: what's wrong with this proof?
From: porky_pig_jr on 6 Aug 2010 16:03 On Aug 6, 12:24 pm, "Socratis" <socra...(a)alice.it> wrote:> > This *Socratis* is a Clone of real Socratis. > > Socratis real Socratis. Not clear. Which one is a Clone and which one is a Clown?
From: Socratis on 6 Aug 2010 16:39 <porky_pig_jr(a)my-deja.com> ha scritto nel messaggio On Aug 6, 12:24 pm, "Socratis" <socra...(a)alice.it> wrote:> > This *Socratis* is a Clone of real Socratis. > >> Socratis real Socratis. >Not clear. Which one is a Clone and which one is a Clown? Cretino ! You are Idiote men! Socratis Real is socratis(a)alice.it. Fake is soxatis(a)alice.it. Socratis.
From: Socratis on 6 Aug 2010 20:55 "Socratis" <socratis(a)alice.it> wrote in message news:4c5c730b$0$18997$4fafbaef(a)reader5.news.tin.it... > > <porky_pig_jr(a)my-deja.com> ha scritto nel messaggio > > On Aug 6, 12:24 pm, "Socratis" <socra...(a)alice.it> wrote:> >> This *Socratis* is a Clone of real Socratis. >> >>> Socratis real Socratis. > >>Not clear. Which one is a Clone and which one is a Clown? > > Cretino ! You are Idiote men! > > Socratis Real is socratis(a)alice.it. > > Fake is soxatis(a)alice.it. > > Socratis. > I did not post this! I have nothing to say, and I am saying it. After all, nothing I post.
From: porky_pig_jr on 6 Aug 2010 22:50 On Aug 6, 4:39 pm, "Socratis" <socra...(a)alice.it> wrote: > <porky_pig...(a)my-deja.com> ha scritto nel messaggio > > On Aug 6, 12:24 pm, "Socratis" <socra...(a)alice.it> wrote:> > > > This *Socratis* is a Clone of real Socratis. > > >> Socratis real Socratis. > >Not clear. Which one is a Clone and which one is a Clown? > > Cretino ! You are Idiote men! > > Socratis Real is socra...(a)alice.it. > > Fake is soxa...(a)alice.it. > > Socratis. Oh, I got it now! You are the clown. He's the clone. Si?
From: Philippe 92 on 7 Aug 2010 05:19
porky_pig_jr(a)my-deja.com wrote : > On Aug 6, 4:39�pm, "Socratis" <socra...(a)alice.it> wrote: >> <porky_pig...(a)my-deja.com> ha scritto nel messaggio >> On Aug 6, 12:24 pm, "Socratis" <socra...(a)alice.it> wrote:> >> >>> This *Socratis* is a Clone of real Socratis. >>> >>> Not clear. Which one is a Clone and which one is a Clown? >> >> Cretino ! You are Idiote men! i-diote ?? >> >> Socratis Real is socratis(a)alice.it. >> Fake is soxatis(a)alice.it. >> >> Socratis. False (not a surprise however). From the very message headers : The initial poster (the clone) : From: "Socratis" <socratis(a)alice.it> Organization: TIN.IT (http://www.tin.it) NNTP-Posting-Host: MfcSa9Gg1lNATDRNJBn04Q.user.speranza.aioe.org Reply-To: "Socratis" <socratis(a)alice.it> The one claiming he is the original Socratis : From: "Socratis" <socratis(a)alice.it> Organization: TIN.IT (http://www.tin.it) NNTP-Posting-Host: 87.1.217.155 Reply-To: "Socratis" <socratis(a)alice.it> The only difference is in the NNTP posting host (and the language and claims). No "soxatis" at all there. You might compare with other messages to see who is the fake and who the original, if you have some time to lose... The fake has completely forged the headers, with the exact same "from:" etc. as the original. He couldn't fake however the posting host ... > > Oh, I got it now! > > You are the clown. He's the clone. Si? You got it. -- Philippe C., mail : chephip, with domain free.fr site : http://mathafou.free.fr/ (mathematical recreations) |