Motion
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Free fall
Next: 50% OF POPULATION BELOW AVG IQ!
From: Sam Wormley on 21 Sep 2005 12:24 TomGee wrote: > My model contends that energy is a force. Force http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Force.html Energy http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Energy.html Conservation of Energy http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/ConservationofEnergy.html TomGee's model is wrong. Force and energy are different entities.
From: odin on 21 Sep 2005 12:36 > TomGee's model is wrong. Force and energy are different entities. I have to agree. Just as wrong as Don1... but sadly, TomGee is much more long winded about his bogus ideas than Don1 is.
From: TomGee on 21 Sep 2005 12:56 Sam Wormley wrote: > TomGee wrote: > > > My model contends that energy is a force. > > Force > http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Force.html > > Energy > http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Energy.html > > Conservation of Energy > http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/ConservationofEnergy.html > > TomGee's model is wrong. Force and energy are different entities. > > No, it's not. Your model is wrong. You're too stupid to shake off the nonsense you have been taught and to absorb new ideas. In an age where unification is the trend, you insist in bucking it.
From: TomGee on 21 Sep 2005 13:07 you can't logically overthrow my ideas so you rag me instead. You think readers here are so stupid as to not see that. You're not as smart as you make yourself out to be. Go ahead and agree with your buddy Worms all you want, my feelings won't be hurt. In fact, if you ever agree with me, I will reassess my ideas about the parts where you agree. Now you're complaining because I post too much for your widdly brain to absorb at one time, eh? Just take your time and read only one or two paragraphs a day so you won't overload your head and risk it blowing up. Now this is a somewhat long paragraph by your standards, so you may want to read only 1/2 of it today and the rest of it tomorrow. Oh, and please don't go out in the Sun bareheaded; you will only fry your brain all the more. (Sheesh! What has happened to the quality of readers in this ng?)
From: Sam Wormley on 21 Sep 2005 13:07
TomGee wrote: > Sam Wormley wrote: > >>TomGee wrote: >> >> >>>My model contends that energy is a force. >> >> Force >> http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Force.html >> >> Energy >> http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Energy.html >> >> Conservation of Energy >> http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/ConservationofEnergy.html >> >> TomGee's model is wrong. Force and energy are different entities. >> >> > > No, it's not. Your model is wrong. Not my model, but that which has evolved in the last 300 years and empirically correct. > You're too stupid to shake off the > nonsense you have been taught and to absorb new ideas. I doubt it. I'm exposed to many new ideas every week. Those that "make it" are the ones supported of the results of observation and experiment. Your ideas, TomGee, have been contracted by observations, each and every one. > In an age where > unification is the trend, you insist in bucking it. > Unification is where it's at--I'm all for unification supported by observation and experiment. |