Moving Mirror Proves Einstein Wrong
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: LHC marries Aunt-Al
Next: SR and a lightbulb
From: Androcles on 7 Jan 2010 23:48 "eric gisse" <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:hi6a31$f1g$3(a)news.eternal-september.org... > ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > [...] > >>> >>>For the box itself, the speed is zero relative to itself. So the >>>momentum >>>magnitude for the box is zero. >> >> Vector momentum is indeed zero...that's why the box doesn't shoot of >> spontaneously. >> Scalar momentum however is certainly not zero. > [...] > [...]
From: Androcles on 7 Jan 2010 23:49 "eric gisse" <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:hi6a63$f1g$4(a)news.eternal-september.org... > ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > >> On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:20:08 -0800, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>>..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:29:28 -0800, eric gisse >>>> <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >> >>>>> >>>>>So Henry, why is Renshaw's paper - which has a position you agree >>>>>with - >>>>>the first paper I have seen you discuss in nearly 6 years? >>>> >>>> [...] >>> >>>Interesting. I guess all that fluff and blather about how you don't read >>>and don't go to the library is because you can't find anything that >>>agrees >>>with you once you are there. >>> >>>But now that you found someone FINALLY who managed to put his barely >>>coherent thoughts in something approximating a publication, you jump all >>>over it. >>> >>>I note with interest that you have been talking about publishing various >>>things for many years but never quite ever get around to doing it. I >>>wonder what's up with that. Perhaps you don't actually believe the >>>idiocies you spout and just like to troll for attention? >> >> I have to learn to deal with the idiots before I take on the big boys. > > And when will that be, Ralph? You can't even answer simple questions like > 'what books have you read about physics?' without getting argumentative > and > insulting, much less answer in depth questions and handle constructive > criticism without flying off the handle. > [...]
From: Androcles on 7 Jan 2010 23:49 "eric gisse" <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:hi6a9m$f1g$5(a)news.eternal-september.org... > ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > > [..] [...]
From: Androcles on 8 Jan 2010 15:00 "eric gisse" <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:hi7gqi$da1$4(a)news.eternal-september.org... > ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > >> On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 19:52:35 -0800, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>>..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:20:08 -0800, eric gisse >>>> <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:29:28 -0800, eric gisse >>>>>> <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>So Henry, why is Renshaw's paper - which has a position you agree >>>>>>>with >>>>>>>- the first paper I have seen you discuss in nearly 6 years? >>>>>> >>>>>> [...] >>>>> >>>>>Interesting. I guess all that fluff and blather about how you don't >>>>>read >>>>>and don't go to the library is because you can't find anything that >>>>>agrees with you once you are there. >>>>> >>>>>But now that you found someone FINALLY who managed to put his barely >>>>>coherent thoughts in something approximating a publication, you jump >>>>>all >>>>>over it. >>>>> >>>>>I note with interest that you have been talking about publishing >>>>>various >>>>>things for many years but never quite ever get around to doing it. I >>>>>wonder what's up with that. Perhaps you don't actually believe the >>>>>idiocies you spout and just like to troll for attention? >>>> >>>> I have to learn to deal with the idiots before I take on the big boys. >>> >>>And when will that be, Ralph? You can't even answer simple questions like >>>'what books have you read about physics?' without getting argumentative >>>and insulting, much less answer in depth questions and handle >>>constructive >>>criticism without flying off the handle. >>> >>>But perhaps I'm wrong, let's test. >>> >>>What books on electromagnetic theory have you read? >> >> [...] > [...]
From: Androcles on 8 Jan 2010 15:48
"eric gisse" <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:hi83k7$uqj$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > > [...] > >> >> <plonk> > [...] |