From: DanS on
SMS <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com> wrote in
news:4b994c07$0$1611$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net:

> nospam wrote:
>> In article <4b993bf0$0$1594$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net>, SMS
>> <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, you have no idea what you're talking about.
>>
>> yes i do.
>>
>>> I'm sure you are well aware of the reasons that the
>>> iPhone has been deployed by very few major corporations:
>>
>> if by very few, you mean 70% of fortune 100 companies.
>> source: tim cook, apple coo, last month.
>
> You're confused. There are employees at those companies
> using the iPhone, but almost none have deployed the iPhone
> via their IT department. The reason it's only 70% and not
> 100% is because many corporations forbid the use of the
> iPhone for security reasons. You can't even log on to their
> internal networks with one.
>
> You'll need to come up with a better reference than the
> Apple COO if you want to be believed!

It works for Kraft Foods Inc., Oracle Corp. and Amylin
Pharmaceuticals, according to one of the articles I linked in my
other reply.
From: Larry on
John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in
news:5u2ip5puvas9op5fmcpbj9kjjmo2ralmth(a)navasgroup.com:

> ... Apple may have reached a saturation point when it comes to
consumer
> adoption of a smartphone device.
>

In all honesty, I don't think this is correct. Apple has reached the
saturation point of consumer adoption IN THE TINY 3G FOOTPRINT OF AT&T
WIRELESS. Millions of potential iPhone customers are in the red zone of
Verizon outside the tiny blue islands of ATT's 3G footprint. Noone
except the very rabid fanboiz are going to buy an iPhone where there's
only 2G as slow as molasses to run it on. Those customers are being
lost, forever, as they are standing at the Verizon counters to snap up
the smartphones Verizon offers.

What's amazing is it doesn't seem to sink in for Apple investors blinded
by The Light (and noise) coming from Cupertino.



--
"iPad is to computing what Etch-A-Sketch is to art!"

Larry

From: Larry on
SMS <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com> wrote in news:4b993bf0$0$1594
$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net:

> 3. No slide-out keyboard. For business users that are primarily using
> the phone for e-mail, texting, or entering data, the soft keyboard is
> not sufficient.
>

The keyboard issue, for business, could easily be solved if it had a USB
port to plug the goddamned external keyboard INTO at the Holiday Inn at
night......or supported more than sellphone headphones on BLUETOOTH!




--
"iPad is to computing what Etch-A-Sketch is to art!"

Larry

From: SMS on
Larry wrote:

> What's amazing is it doesn't seem to sink in for Apple investors blinded
> by The Light (and noise) coming from Cupertino.

Don't you think that Apple has figured out that the money they're being
paid by AT&T to not do a model for Verizon is more than they could make
by doing a Verizon model. How many _additional_ customers would they get
by doing an iPhone for Verizon (not ones that would switch to Verizon
from AT&T).
From: Warren Oates on
In article <4b993bf0$0$1594$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net>,
SMS <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com> wrote:

> That's not to say Apple will never come out with products more suitable
> for the corporate environment, they could easily do a corporate version
> of the iPhone that solves at least three of the four major issues, but
> they haven't done so yet.

You won't be able to deal with "nospam" in a logical and coherent way.
He's one of those bizarre Apple zealots who see Apple (and Jobs) as a
brand of religion (and deity) that needs defending against all
criticism, no matter how well-founded that criticism is.
--
Very old woody beets will never cook tender.
-- Fannie Farmer
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Meraki Wifi Stumbler
Next: OT