Negative Energy
in [Physics]
|
Prev: The Doppler effect and its meaning about photon energy emission !!
Next: Zero Point Energy examples around Ball Lightning, Comets, Spritesup to Quasars
From: spudnik on 8 Apr 2010 19:52 you need four spatial cooordinates for barycentric calculutions in space; however, they are not orthogonal. I'm not much with algebra, but I do know that it is. NB: a gyrocompass with three independent axes can have a locked condition, or what ever it's called; four axes avoids this & is done in practice ... but I don't know just how much. perhaps, many industries rely on typical operating conditions to avoid such a configureation. > Gravity is attractive, thus it is always negative. And a barycenter > is a region where all forces balance. Maybe you could look up your > terms before making a complete fool ou of yourself.- Hide quoted text - thus: your aether does not appear to have any relation to what de Broglie wrote -- his bare inkling of an initial realization in playing with some math; dyscuss! thus: hey -- don't top-post! > read more »- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - thus quoth: the 200-pound space suit was added to the weight of the astronaut, the gravitational load on the skeletal system could prevent serious bone loss. But for those who were not outside the spacecraft, some reconditioning was necessary, after long stays on http://21stcenturysciencetech.com/ > The 'particle' occupies a very small region of the aether wave. thus: there is no fourth axis that is orthogonal to the three orthogonal axes of space (at least, not at the same origin, and probably not at all isometric). > The best model uses the minimum number of orthogonals thus: cartesianism can be problematic, but that does not make the L-transformation into its antimatter ... unless you throw Schroedinger's joke-cat from the train -- y'know, the Doppler effect? you *can* "do" special & general relativity in trilinear coordinates, but you don't have to!... like, that is what Minkowski's phase-space is, essentially; esp. with quaternions. thus: also, apply the formularium to an actual glass house, say, at a particular lattitude (south of the equator, you won;t always be able to use Polaris .-) thus: c^2 is a great constant to work with; how do you feel about C^2 seconds-per-meter^2 ?? actually c times the second-root of two has already been used as a factor, by Weber & in a very elementary exposition (or, it is supposed to be, in German). thnks for the prima donna soto voce; that really means a lot to me ... zzzz. now, I say, "second root" and second-power, because it has nothing in oarticular to do with The Tetragon. (well, may haps, the *skew* tetragon .-) thus: detrend this; all gasses are glass house gasses, but not at the same window of opening or closing. if you're going to use the Farmer's Almanac for a one-year futures, that's fine with me but I don't care!... I, myself etc. can't do the math, except in tripolars ... when I can configure them! --Light: A History! http://wlym.com http://21stcenturysciencetech.com http://white-smoke.wetpaint.com
From: bert on 9 Apr 2010 09:42 On Apr 8, 7:52 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > you need four spatial cooordinates for barycentric calculutions > in space; however, they are not orthogonal. I'm not much with > algebra, but > I do know that it is. NB: > a gyrocompass with three independent axes can have a locked condition, > or > what ever it's called; four axes avoids this & is done in practice ... > but > I don't know just how much. perhaps, > many industries rely on typical operating conditions > to avoid such a configureation. > > > Gravity is attractive, thus it is always negative. And a barycenter > > is a region where all forces balance. Maybe you could look up your > > terms before making a complete fool ou of yourself.- Hide quoted text - > > thus: > your aether does not appear to have any relation > to what de Broglie wrote -- his bare inkling > of an initial realization in playing with some math; > dyscuss! > > thus: > hey -- don't top-post! > > > read more »- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - > > thus quoth: > the 200-pound space suit was added to the weight of the > astronaut, the gravitational load on the skeletal system > could prevent serious bone loss. > But for those who were not outside the spacecraft, > some reconditioning was necessary, after long stays onhttp://21stcenturysciencetech.com/ > > > The 'particle' occupies a very small region of the aether wave. > > thus: > there is no fourth axis that is orthogonal > to the three orthogonal axes of space (at least, > not at the same origin, and probably not at all isometric). > > > The best model uses the minimum number of orthogonals > > thus: > cartesianism can be problematic, but that does not > make the L-transformation into its antimatter ... > unless you throw Schroedinger's joke-cat from the train -- > y'know, the Doppler effect? > you *can* "do" special & general relativity in trilinear > coordinates, but > you don't have to!... like, that is what Minkowski's phase-space is, > essentially; esp. with quaternions. > > thus: > also, apply the formularium to an actual glass house, say, > at a particular lattitude (south of the equator, > you won;t always be able to use Polaris .-) > > thus: > c^2 is a great constant to work with; > how do you feel about C^2 seconds-per-meter^2 ?? > > actually c times the second-root of two has already been > used as a factor, by Weber & in a very elementary exposition (or, > it is supposed to be, in German). > > thnks for the prima donna soto voce; > that really means a lot to me ... zzzz. > > now, I say, "second root" and second-power, because > it has nothing in oarticular to do with The Tetragon. (well, > may haps, the *skew* tetragon .-) > > thus: > detrend this; all gasses are glass house gasses, but > not at the same window of opening or closing. > if you're going to use the Farmer's Almanac for a one-year > futures, > that's fine with me but I don't care!... I, myself etc. can't do the > math, > except in tripolars ... when I can configure them! > > --Light: A History!http://wlym.comhttp://21stcenturysciencetech.comhttp://white-smoke.wetpaint.com Universe is energy,and it has both possitive and negative. Energy like matter particles are created in these + and - pairs. Universes are created in pairs. My universe is negative(Bert) and Treb's is positive. Its natures first balancing act,and there are as many universes as flakes of in an endless storm. All alike right down to the same number of electrons Treb+Bertbis
From: Igor on 9 Apr 2010 09:49 On Apr 8, 7:52 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > you need four spatial cooordinates for barycentric calculutions > in space; however, they are not orthogonal. How could coordinates be orthogonal? > I'm not much with > algebra, but > I do know that it is. Doesn't sound like it to me. >NB: > a gyrocompass with three independent axes can have a locked condition, > or > what ever it's called; four axes avoids this & is done in practice ... > but > I don't know just how much. perhaps, > many industries rely on typical operating conditions > to avoid such a configureation. > > > Gravity is attractive, thus it is always negative. And a barycenter > > is a region where all forces balance. Maybe you could look up your > > terms before making a complete fool ou of yourself.- Hide quoted text - > > thus: > your aether does not appear to have any relation > to what de Broglie wrote -- his bare inkling > of an initial realization in playing with some math; > dyscuss! What aether? There is no aether. And what's de Broglie have to do with classical mechanics? > thus: > hey -- don't top-post! I don't. You've got everything all jumbled up. Just like your mental state.
From: Igor on 9 Apr 2010 09:51 On Apr 9, 9:42 am, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > Universe is energy,and it has both possitive and negative. Energy like > matter particles are created in these + and - pairs. Universes are > created in pairs. My universe is negative(Bert) and Treb's is > positive. Its natures first balancing act,and there are as many > universes as flakes of in an endless storm. All alike right down to > the same number of electrons Treb+Bertbis Can you actually state something relating to scientific reality? Your second sentence comes close, but still ends up out in neverland.
From: BURT on 9 Apr 2010 14:20
On Apr 5, 6:51 am, HardySpicer <gyansor...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > How is it related to anti-matter? does En=-mc^2? > > Hardy There is no negative energy. Hawking radiation black hole decay depends on negative energy falling into a black hole. But there will always be an equal amount of positive energy created that would fall in keeping black hole energy the same. They would not explode. Mitch Raemsch |