From: Ian Piper on
On 2010-08-06 11:24:11 +0100, Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> said:

> They should also have a coffee shop.
>
> Actually, do any of them do that? Even if it was just a
> Starbucks/Costa/Whatever? That would actually be quite cool.
>
> Jim

I doubt that they would see that as a good use of their retail space,
even in a shop that size: although the profit per square foot of coffee
is quite high I imagine Apple kit's ppsf numbers are higher. Anyway,
you can barely throw a stone in any direction in central London without
it landing in a freshly-brewed cappuccino - why would they need another
outlet? Finally, just think of the opportunities for disastrous
fluid/technology interfacing...


Ian.
--
Ian Piper
Author of "Learn Xcode Tools for Mac OS X and iPhone Development",
Apress, December 2009
Learn more here: http://learnxcodebook.com/�
--�

From: Chris Ridd on
On 2010-08-08 13:08:49 +0100, Ian Piper said:

> On 2010-08-06 11:24:11 +0100, Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> said:
>
>> They should also have a coffee shop.
>>
>> Actually, do any of them do that? Even if it was just a
>> Starbucks/Costa/Whatever? That would actually be quite cool.
>>
>> Jim
>
> I doubt that they would see that as a good use of their retail space,
> even in a shop that size: although the profit per square foot of coffee
> is quite high I imagine Apple kit's ppsf numbers are higher.

Apple publish their profits per square metre, somewhere. They're *very* high.

> Anyway, you can barely throw a stone in any direction in central
> London without it landing in a freshly-brewed cappuccino - why would
> they need another outlet? Finally, just think of the opportunities for
> disastrous fluid/technology interfacing...

Our local Borders used to have an upstairs Starbucks, and that worked
OK. Of course where are Borders now ;-)

--
Chris

From: Mark on
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 13:44:17 +0100, Chris Ridd wrote
(in article <8c7n51FmrkU1(a)mid.individual.net>):

> On 2010-08-08 13:08:49 +0100, Ian Piper said:
>
>> On 2010-08-06 11:24:11 +0100, Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> said:
>>
>>> They should also have a coffee shop.
>>>
>>> Actually, do any of them do that? Even if it was just a
>>> Starbucks/Costa/Whatever? That would actually be quite cool.
>>>
>>> Jim
>>
>> I doubt that they would see that as a good use of their retail space,
>> even in a shop that size: although the profit per square foot of coffee
>> is quite high I imagine Apple kit's ppsf numbers are higher.
>
> Apple publish their profits per square metre, somewhere. They're *very* high.
>
A couple of articles note that the Regent Street shop was named as the most
profitable per square foot in the capital, with takings around �60 million a
year, or �2,000 per square foot.
>
>> Anyway, you can barely throw a stone in any direction in central
>> London without it landing in a freshly-brewed cappuccino - why would
>> they need another outlet? Finally, just think of the opportunities for
>> disastrous fluid/technology interfacing...
>
> Our local Borders used to have an upstairs Starbucks, and that worked
> OK. Of course where are Borders now ;-)
>



From: Chris Ridd on
On 2010-08-08 14:15:44 +0100, Mark said:

> A couple of articles note that the Regent Street shop was named as the most
> profitable per square foot in the capital, with takings around �60 million a
> year, or �2,000 per square foot.

That's what I was thinking of. Not Apple exactly publishing their figures!

--
Chris

From: Pd on
Chris Ridd <chrisridd(a)mac.com> wrote:

> On 2010-08-08 14:15:44 +0100, Mark said:
>
> > A couple of articles note that the Regent Street shop was named as the most
> > profitable per square foot in the capital, with takings around �60 million a
> > year, or �2,000 per square foot.
>
> That's what I was thinking of. Not Apple exactly publishing their figures!

Pretty impressive - I think the next highest was �1000/sq foot. Still
not a patch on the New York Apple store though, at $35,000 per sq ft.

--
Pd