New Book of Rules
in [Design]
|
From: Jim Thompson on 31 Jul 2006 22:57 On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:53:30 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >Jim Thompson wrote: >> >> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 03:38:13 +0100, Eeyore >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> [snip] >> > >> >And as for saying perhaps that Israel is responding in kind - one expects a higher >> >standard of behaviour from a nation that chooses to present itself as civilised and >> >western - or else one might righty conclude that they're not worthy of our support. >> > >> >Graham >> >> Neeerp! That's the kind of leftist weenie cowardly attitude that has >> gotten us into these quagmires. We need to refresh our memories, act >> like World War II soldiers, and kill anyone that farts crosswise. >> >> Jim Thompson > > > That's why they need to build a modified, heat seeking M-72. A "fart-seeker"? Now THAT'S a novel idea ;-) ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | | | E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat | | http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
From: Phat Bytestard on 31 Jul 2006 22:54 On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:59:38 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: >Which is making the USA ever more loathed worldwide ! It's entirely contrary to >the USA's best long-term interests too. We'll get over a couple hundred thousand dipshits like you... no problem. Done already... in fact.
From: Jim Thompson on 31 Jul 2006 22:58 On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 03:52:54 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Jim Thompson wrote: > >> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 03:05:14 +0100, Eeyore >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> >Phat Bytestard wrote: >> > >> >> You really are 100% clueless about armaments.It isn't a race. It is >> >> a protector. A defensive tool. >> > >> >What's defensive about bombing civilians ? Maybe American news isn't brave >> >enough to show the truth ? >> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/5232434.stm >> > >> >A human rights group says the Israeli air strike on Qana that killed 54 >> >civilians is a "war crime". >> > >> >Graham >> >> What group, CAIR ?:-) >> >> ...Jim Thompson > >Human Rights Watch > >Graham Aha! A leftist weenie organization... probably anti-Semitic just like you ;-) ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | | | E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat | | http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
From: Phat Bytestard on 31 Jul 2006 22:57 On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 03:02:06 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >"Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > >> Eeyore wrote: >> > >> > "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: >> > >> > > Eeyore wrote: >> >> > > > Hezbollah is a militia too of course too. You Americans should *support* it ! >> > > > >> > > > Graham >> > > >> > > More proof that you are insane. :( >> > >> > More proof that you're two-faced. >> > >> > If a well-regulated militia is good for America why shouldn't it be good elsewhere ? >> > >> > Graham >> >> You are insane. Period. No nation has to support the militia of any >> other nation, or is that so complex that you can't understand it? > >America believes in the *principle* of an armed civil militia. What's so wrong with applying >that principle elsewhere ? > Our armies are not a militia. Within the country, the only militias are typically classified as radical here as well, dumbfuck. One exception would be the "Minutemen". By the way... they don't even fire a shot, despite being armed.
From: Eeyore on 31 Jul 2006 22:56
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > Eeyore wrote: > > > > "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > > > > > Eeyore wrote: > > > > > > > America believes in the *principle* of an armed civil militia. What's so wrong with applying > > > > that principle elsewhere ? > > > > > > > > Graham > > > > > > Now you are changing the subject. > > > > Not at all. > > > > > Support implies providing arms, food, fuel and other weapons. > > > > Where did I say anything about support ? > > > > Graham > > How about in your own words? "Hezbollah is a militia too of course > too. You Americans should *support* it !" Support the principle of having armed militias of course. Graham |