New Book of Rules
in [Design]
|
From: Phat Bytestard on 31 Jul 2006 23:28 On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 03:38:13 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: >I have been. I bet you haven't though. There are specific requirements for >conducting war in areas where civilians are living. Which were followed, dipshit.
From: Eeyore on 31 Jul 2006 23:25 John Larkin wrote: > On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 03:05:14 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: > > >What's defensive about bombing civilians ? Maybe American news isn't brave > >enough to show the truth ? > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/5232434.stm > > > >A human rights group says the Israeli air strike on Qana that killed 54 > >civilians is a "war crime". > > You can find "a human rights group" that will say anything you want to > hear. Maybe so but in this case it really seems pretty clear. As for bombing the UN too !!!!! > Hamas uses civilians, schools, and UN posts as cover for rocket > launchers, so that directed Israeli counterattacks cause civilian > casualties. On the other hand, 100% of the essentially unguided Hamas > rocket attacks are directed at Israeli civilians; 100% are terror > attacks. Are the Hamas rockets war crimes? That's Gaza. Please don't confuse the issues. Lebanon is entirely another matter. Another country in fact. > All Lebanon has to do is stop the rocket attacks and hand over the two > soldiers. That's all. But Hamas/Iran cares less for the Lebanese Hamas isn't the issue in Lebanon. > civilian population than Israel does; after all, Iranians are > Persians, and the Lebanese are merely Arabs. Wrong. There's a very large amount of European blood in Lebanon. Indeed Lebanon is both Christian and Moslem. Living in peace now too after Israel poked its bloody big nose in *last time round* and screwed everyone. > Israel officially regrets civilian casualties; Hamas regrets nothing. Regrets mean *nothing*. Anyone can say that stuff. > Hamas has about 10,000 Iranian rockets in southern Lebanon. If they > are fired into Israeli cities at the current rate of about 100 a day, > and Israel takes out unfired missiles at about the same rate, it will > all be over in about 50 days. We may in due course see. If Israel gets new American weapons in the meantime, don't be too surprised it Hezbollah gets more too. Graham
From: Eeyore on 31 Jul 2006 23:30 Phat Bytestard wrote: > On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 03:35:31 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >> > >> Hezbollah needs to die, and their sponsors as well. > > > >Ain't gonna happen. > > You're an idiot. It's not going to happen any more than Islam is going to die out. Graham
From: John Larkin on 31 Jul 2006 23:34 On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 03:38:13 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: > > >"Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > >> Eeyore wrote: >> > >> > "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: >> > >> > > Eeyore wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Phat Bytestard wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > You really are 100% clueless about armaments.It isn't a race. It is >> > > > > a protector. A defensive tool. >> > > > >> > > > What's defensive about bombing civilians ? Maybe American news isn't brave >> > > > enough to show the truth ? >> > > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/5232434.stm >> > > > >> > > > A human rights group says the Israeli air strike on Qana that killed 54 >> > > > civilians is a "war crime". >> > > > >> > > > Graham >> > > >> > > Is it a declared war? If so, there are no civilians in a military >> > > area during a war. >> > >> > Wrong already. >> > >> > Go and read the Geneva Conventions. >> > >> > Graham >> >> Why don't you? > >I have been. I bet you haven't though. There are specific requirements for >conducting war in areas where civilians are living. > >And as for saying perhaps that Israel is responding in kind - one expects a higher >standard of behaviour from a nation that chooses to present itself as civilised and >western - or else one might righty conclude that they're not worthy of our support. Their "standard of behavior" is that they want to live, and are willing to let others live as long as they are left alone. The standard of behavior of Iran and Hamas is "kill all the Jews." I know which side I prefer to support. John
From: Eeyore on 31 Jul 2006 23:32
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > Eeyore wrote: > > > > Jim Thompson wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 03:52:54 +0100, Eeyore > > > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >Human Rights Watch > > > > > > > >Graham > > > > > > Aha! A leftist weenie organization > > > > The way you dismiss the views of anyone not sharing your bigotry is telling. > > > > Graham > > I see that you clipped the "probably anti-Semitic just like you ;-)" > without comment. Because it's idiotic. I'm certainly more pro-Jewish than I am 'pro-Moslem'. Indeed I'm not pro-Moslem at all - I'm moderately critical of Islam in fact. I have no issues with the Jewish faith at all. Graham |